build-depends? I've tried it
with openjdk-6-jdk and it seems to work fairly well but does still have
some issues.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hi,
sounds to me that the best resolution would be to remove xerces-j as
well: no software depends on it (says 'apt-cache showpkg'), and it's
been superseded by xerces2 since ages (also upstream).
I'm no DD but let me know if I can help.
Eric
Barry deFreese wrote
and remove the jikes-kaffe build-depends?
Another option would be to remove libnsuml-java from the archive as it
has no r(b)depends and a low popcon score.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers
and
tijmp is the only remaining build dependency.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
snip
tijmp 0.8+dfsg-1 Build-Depends on openjdk-6-jdk instead of sun-java6-jdk.
Its currently waiting in NEW for processing.
Cheers,
Michael
Michael,
Yeah, I missed the change in build-dep, my screw up. Sorry for the noise!
Barry
___
normal
reassign nn ftp.debian.org
retitle nn RM: packagename -- RoM; reasons
thanks
For more information, see
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
___
pkg-java
severity 548753 normal
reassign 548753 ftp.debian.org
retitle 548753 RM: vecmath1.2 -- RoQA; outdated, dead upstream, very low
popcon
thank you
Hi,
I am moving this right to an RM after speaking with one of the Java Team
maintainers.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
Hello maintainer,
I am trying to get some clarity on simple-xml. In debian/copyright you specify
that the package is LGPL 2.1. However, I cannot find any indication of a
version of the LGPL the package is carried under. Am I missing it somewhere?
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian FTP
Hi,
Here is a patch that works for me. It doesn't seem to work with the 2.9.0 on
mentors though.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 100_javac_source_1.5.dpatch by bdefre...@bddebian3.bddebian.com
##
## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description
Hello maintainer,
I am rejecting simple-xml. Debian/copyright states the files are LGPL-2.1 but
I cannot find anywhere in the file headers nor any COPYING or LICENSE file that
states they are 2.1, but rather just LGPL. Am I missing it?
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian FTP Assistant
/copyright. CERN and SLAC.
I have not accepted or rejected this package yet until I hear back from you.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian FTP Assistant
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http
Mascellani ha scritto:
Hi,
(Cc:-ing Gabriele Giacone, comaintainer with me)
Barry deFreese ha scritto:
Hello maintainer,
The orig.tar.gz for FreeHEP swing doesn't seem to carry a LICENSE or
COPYING file and I cannot find any mention of the GPL in any headers.
Where are you getting
Hello maintainer,
I am accepting freehep-swing. However, as discussed, please consider adding
the missing copyright holders and try to prod upstream to add a proper license
file to the tarball.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian FTP Assistant
13 matches
Mail list logo