Hi!
Can you provide this patch here? Thanks in advance. :-)
--
--
Chris
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Dear Debian maintainer,
(oh no, not him again...)
The hadoop Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 593670 (and maybe other similar bugs).
We are currently in the beginning of a new
Quoting Thomas Koch (tho...@koch.ro):
Christian PERRIER:
Dear Debian maintainer,
(oh no, not him again...)
The hadoop Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 593670
Dear maintainer of hadoop and Debian translators,
Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the hadoop Debian
package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation
update in the BTS.
I announced the intent to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
for
Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-03-29 07:45, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Dear maintainer of hadoop and Debian translators,
Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the hadoop Debian
package, mentioning
Why don't you do it like RHEL, CentOS and Fedora with logrotate?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=tomcat.git;a=blob;f=tomcat-7.0.logrotate;h=a87b4c005cce267f7ffc6625a44b4a8ff3fad77b;hb=HEAD
Chris
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
.jar in /usr/share/java.
Regards,
Christian
-- Error message
$ azureus
[warning] /usr/bin/azureus: Unable to locate swt in /usr/share/java
file:/usr/lib/jni/ ; file:/usr/lib/java/ ; file:/usr/share/java/Azureus2.jar ;
file:/usr/share/java/log4j-1.2-1.2.15.jar ;
file:/usr/share/java/commons-cli
Quoting Torsten Werner (twer...@debian.org):
So, sorry for this, but the radar beeped at your package and here am I
with an NMU intent...:-)
No, that is not the way to go. The package does not transition to
testing because the ia32 support on ia64 is broken. Please see bug
#563402 for
appreciate if you could consider that request
positively. Please keep me posted (private mail is probably enough, no
need to wide CC).
Many thanks in advance for your work, past, present...and future..:-)
--
Christian Perrier
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http
Last upload of tomcat6 fixed a French translation update for debconf
messages (#594313)but left aside a few other l10n updates (#592627
#592655 #593676).
And now, there's another one: #595460.
Is there any chance that you can make yet another one? :-)
--
signature.asc
Description:
Package: sun-java6-jdk
Version: 6-22-0lenny1
Severity: normal
Problem appeared after the following Java upgrade (using aptitude):
2010-11-29 21:58:59 upgrade sun-java6-jdk 6-20-0lenny1 6-22-0lenny1
2010-11-29 21:59:01 upgrade sun-java6-bin 6-20-0lenny1 6-22-0lenny1
2010-11-29 21:59:04 upgrade
Package: sun-java6
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find attached the Czech debconf templates update.
Please note that I am *not* the translator : I send this file on
her/his behalf. The real translator name and address is listed in the
Last-Translator field in the
, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
# translation of fr.po to French
# Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER
# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package.
#
# Florentin Duneau f.ba...@wanadoo.fr, 2006.
# Christian Perrier
Package: sun-java6
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find attached the Slovak debconf templates update.
Please note that I am *not* the translator : I send this file on
her/his behalf. The real translator name and address is listed in the
Last-Translator field in the
-java...not found
testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...not found
testing /usr/lib/kaffe/pthreads...not found
==
Christian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable
browser.
`
and then with this dialogbox :
,
| An error has occurred. See the log file
/home/marillat/workspace/.metadata/.log
`
here is the log :
.log
Description: Binary data
Christian
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java
Hello,
I just noticed new or modified debconf templates appearing for this
package.
I would like to suggest you to consider calling for debconf templates
review AND translation updates when you introduce new debconf
templates or modify the existing templates in a package or, if you
prefer, to
Quoting Thomas Koch (tho...@koch.ro):
Hallo Christian,
I'm sorry, if I didn't follow the process as required. It's the first time I
use debconf and there are so many things one has to learn, that's very hard
not to miss anything.
No problem. The mail est precisely meant for this: help
Dear Debian maintainer,
The Debian internationalisation team and the Debian English
localisation team will soon begin the review of the debconf
templates used in hadoop.
This review takes place for all packages that use debconf to interact with
users and its aims are:
- to improve the use of
Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for
the hadoop source package.
This review will last from Tuesday, March 30, 2010 to Friday, April 09, 2010.
Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original
files. Comments about your proposed changes
Quoting Justin B Rye (j...@edlug.org.uk):
Christian PERRIER wrote:
Your review should be sent as an answer to this mail.
Sorry, I'm running late, comments but no actual patch attached.
No problem. based on your comments and proposals, I cooked the
attached review.
Source: hadoop
Section
Quoting Justin B Rye (j...@edlug.org.uk):
Justin B Rye wrote:
comments but no actual patch attached.
Second thoughts and patch.
As usuall, all suggestions adopted..:)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
This is the last call for comments for the review of debconf
templates for hadoop.
The reviewed templates will be sent on Monday, April 12, 2010 to the package
maintainer as a bug report and a mail will be sent to this list with
[BTS] as a subject tag.
--
Template: hadoop-namenoded/format
Package: hadoop
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Debian maintainer,
On Friday, March 26, 2010, I notified you of the beginning of a review process
concerning debconf templates for hadoop.
The debian-l10n-english contributors have now reviewed these templates,
and the proposed
This is a reminder for the running translation round for debconf
templates of hadoop.
Currently complete languages:
cs de es fr pt ru sv vi
Currently existing but incomplete languages:
Please send out updates before Monday, May 03, 2010.
On Tuesday, May 04, 2010, I will notify
the hadoop
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:00:21 +0200
+
hadoop (0.20.2+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version 0.20.2
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Debian maintainer,
(oh no, not him again...)
The tomcat7 Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 651162 (and maybe other similar bugs).
So, sorry for this, but the radar beeped
Quoting tony mancill (tmanc...@debian.org):
Hello Christian,
Thanks for the radar ping. I'll perform an upload of tomcat7 in the next
few days so we have the translation in the archive by the end of
February. Sorry that this one has taken so long. We did apply the
patch the day
Quoting tony mancill (tmanc...@debian.org):
Oops - I already pulled the trigger on an updated package of 7.0.23.
However, the team is preparing an upload of 7.0.26. We can definitely
wait a week before uploading that.
No problem. I'll launch the call for translations just as if you
didn't
Dear maintainer of tomcat7 and Debian translators,
Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the tomcat7 Debian
package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation
update in the BTS.
The package maintainer and I agreed for a translation update round. At
the end
: Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:00:27 +0100
Closes: 651162 661644
Changes:
tomcat7 (7.0.23-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Fix pending l10n issues. Debconf translations:
* Dutch; (Jeroen Schot). Closes: #651162
* Polish (Michał
Dear Debian maintainer,
The jspwiki Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 619304 (and maybe other similar bugs).
The i18n team is now hunting the very last bits of missing
Quoting tony mancill (tmanc...@debian.org):
Hello Joe,
The but report instructs to Please include the formerly attached Danish
debconf translations without using Mutt or a Mutt version without bugs.
However, I don't see an attachment for this bug report, and I cannot
find the previous bug
Dear maintainer of jspwiki and Debian translators,
Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the jspwiki Debian
package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation
update in the BTS.
The package maintainer and I agreed for a translation update round. At
the end
: Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:07:21 +0100
Closes: 619304 654392 664649
Changes:
jspwiki (2.8.0-4.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Fix pending l10n issues. Debconf translations:
* Danish (Joe Hansen). Closes: #619304
* Dutch; (Jeroen
packages containing
servlet-api-debian.pom).
from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666256#23
and the Fix will be a new Tomcat6 DEB to handle the Upgrade
cleanly?
Then I will happily wait for the Update.
Thanks
Christian
--
Christian Hilgers ch...@familie
severity 506018 important
thanks
I really fail to see why this bug should be release critical. The bug
doesn't really fit is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly,
it violates a must or required directive), or, in the package
maintainer's or release manager's opinion, makes the package
be
uploaded soon (4.2.0.8-2).
A short test of that version shows the first problem indeed fixed, but the
second is not (where Japanese characters are decoded into question marks, that
still happens with the second non-working example torrent).
Best regards,
Christian Ohm
to UTF-8, Azureus still shows
question marks - looks to me like it just uses the first filename it finds,
while qbittorrent and transmission use the UTF-8 name.
Best regards,
Christian Ohm
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers
Dear Debian maintainer,
The Debian internationalisation team and the Debian English
localisation team will soon begin the review of the debconf
templates used in solr.
This review takes place for all packages that use debconf to interact with
users and its aims are:
- to improve the use of
Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for
the solr source package.
This review will last from Sunday, September 16, 2007 to Wednesday, September
26, 2007.
Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original
files. Comments about your proposed
I also experienced this, and the patch posted at the Ubuntu link worked for me.
The bug is already fixed in Ubuntu. Maybe this report should be reassigned to
libgtk2.0-0?
cheers,
Christian Henz
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java
Package: solr
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Debian maintainer,
On Saturday, September 15, 2007, I notified you of the beginning of a review
process
concerning debconf templates for solr.
The debian-l10n-english contributors have now reviewed these templates,
and the proposed
Package: solr
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find attached the french debconf templates update, proofread by the
debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors.
If you do not already use it, you might consider using the
podebconf-report-po utility, which helps warning
Dear Debian maintainer,
On Saturday, September 15, 2007, I sent you a notification about the beginning
of a review
action on debconf templates for solr.
Then, I sent you a bug report with rewritten templates and announcing
the beginning of the second phase of this action: call for translation
? Sadly Debian seems not to have an automated
upgrade to the Java6 packages.
bye,
-christian-
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED
The severity of this bug is important because tools like continuum
produce command lines like this and are unusable because of this bug.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
This bug is fixed with current Mercurial tip and will be in the next
release.
- twisti
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Opened a bug in the CACAO bugzilla:
http://server.complang.tuwien.ac.at/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64
- twisti
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
OK, I didn't know these are assembler macros. That is good and even the
MIPSpro assembler knows them. But I put the .set mipsX directives into
#ifdef's as they are not known by MIPSpro. Here are the changesets:
http://mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at/hg/cacao/rev/683df1b2eac0
I guess you are talking about this code:
http://mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at/hg/cacao/file/2effc42cfb01/src/vm/jit/mips/asmpart.S#l426
This code is correct, as the fsX defines use paired registers, starting
with a even one. Also see:
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 12:49 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
I leave the Debian bug open for this one.
Is there still a problem somewhere? Did I miss something?
- twisti
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 17:17 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 12:49 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
I leave the Debian bug open for this one.
Is there still a problem somewhere? Did I miss something?
I believe the SVN commit you pointed
Dear Debian maintainer,
The solr Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
for po-debconf, namely bug number 483416 (and maybe other similar bugs).
We're now getting very close to the release and fixing l10n bugs should
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:19:07 +0200
From: Jan-Pascal van Best [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Swedish l10n included
Version: 1.2.0+ds1-4
Swedish l10n included in release 1.2.0+ds1-4. Due to a bug in tag, this
actual version never made it to the archive. 1.2.0+ds2-1
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian
i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload
for solr in order to fix this as well as all pending translations
for the debconf templates.
After
/lib/nice.jar.
bye,
-christian-
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-amd64-k8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.1-6
Severity: important
I've installed the Debian version of Eclipse for the first time
today. The box starts a bunch of vnc4servers via gdm which are the
main method of accessing it.
In the ~2 hours I've tried working with Eclipse since the install my
VNC session
Are you really really sure Eclipse is the reason for your crashing.
Reasonably sure. I've been using this exact VNC+gdm setup for many
months and I usually leave my VNC sessions open for days. Eclipse is
the only thing new.
In my other e-mail (sent to -quiet) I describe a minimalist sequence
of
This seems to confirm this is a problem with your VNC server; it probably
doesn't respond well to some special event or sequence of event sent by
Eclipse. Which package provides your
VNC server?
That's vnc4server.
The next step to troubleshoot your problem is quite probably to rebuild
change your package to use Ruby 1.9 or 2.0. The ruby
metapackage depends on the current default interpreter version.
Thanks,
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03
`-
__
This is the maintainer address
(see #730095), or any
of the existing FTBFS bugs:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby-defaults-2.0;users=debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Where to get help
-
Please see https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby
Thank you for your attention.
--
,''`. Christian
-cpp
Carl Worth cwo...@debian.org
notmuch
ruby-mail (U)
ruby-treetop (U)
Carlos Zuferri ch...@altorricon.com
live-manual (U)
Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org
bundler (U)
gist (U)
ruby-docile (U)
ruby-mechanize (U)
ruby-rack1.4 (U)
ruby-thor (U)
ruby2.0 (U
by the original uptstream
tomcat package
(https://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.56/bin/apache-tomcat-7.0.56.tar.gz)
tomcat starts normally as expected.
Same problem has been reportet in numerous places, e.g.:
https://forums.alfresco.com/comment/145885#comment-145885
Regards
Christian
Package: java-package
Version: 0.59
Severity: important
Make-jpkg is breaking the packaging of the embedded eclipse that runs jmc (Java
Mission Control). The tool will not run
from within the installed .deb file. It runs just fine from the tar extracted
directly onto disk.
Error message when
by modules with Multi-Arch: foreign and that
> tracker.d.o will tell you where (e.g. ruby-rd).
Noted. A number of dependency cycles would also go away, I imagine.
** Plus, ruby-interpreter serves as an escape hatch for
bootstrapping rubyX.Y on new archs.
*** This is done using code in dh_ruby.
ch indicates that jruby should simply drop the provides.
I do not think it is feasible today to ship a ruby implementation
that provides ruby-interpreter without (some form of) support in
gem2deb.
Best is probably to just drop the Provides in jruby.
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler
-bash: /usr/bin/rake: /usr/bin/ruby: bad interpreter: No such file or
> directory
This is clearly jruby violating its advertisement of
ruby-interpreter. Reassigning.
Thanks,
--
,''`. Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org>
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' 7D1A CFFA D9E0
, I'd like to revisit this issue during "buster" development
> cycle.
Sure. I'd suggest coming to the next ruby sprint, whenever that will
be. Discussing the correct dependencies is a lot easier with a
whiteboard.
Cheers,
--
christian hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org>
__
This is
g the version 3.7 (from jabref.org) I can not reproduce this. It seems that
3.7 doesn't forget the toggle status of the groups interface.
kind
Christian Buhtz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x8
during initialization of VM
Invalid layout of preloaded class: use -XX:+TraceClassLoading to see the
origin of the problem class
Best Regards
-christian-
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>.
Package: libsurefire-java
Version: 2.17-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
2.2.0 has been released in april 2017
Christian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 4.1.42 (SMP w/8 CPU
make sense to you
to combine that with dpkg-statoverride [1] somehow?
That would be to allow a user to override those permissions and retain them
across update/installs/reinstalls.
[1]: https://manpages.debian.org/wheezy/dpkg/dpkg-statoverride.8.en.html
--
Christian Ehrhardt
Software Enginee
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Control: severity -1 wishlist
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> Le 19/09/2017 à 14:17, Christian Ehrhardt a écrit :
>
> > Not sure if that can be reasonably combined, but would it make sense to
>
Package: jabref
Version: 3.8.2+ds-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
there is a new upstream version 4.0 available.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux
Had to downgrade to get things working again here as well. Just wanted
to add to the BTS that neither the logfiles nor the console output
contains any information or stacktraces regarding the issue. Server
starts up normally and deploys/unpacks the web applications normally.
All accesses yield a
Package: jabref
Version: 3.8.2+ds-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
JabRef is currently not working. The script in /usr/bin/jabref requires
"java8". But this need is ignored and version 9 is used. Because of that there
are some errors.
I don'T know how to make the installed JabRef run
5.5.26-5 and lo and behold - everything was
fine.
I'm not sure which package to blame though eclipse-jdt or
libjasper-java.
Yours,
--
___ | Christian Holm Christensen
|_| | -
| | Address: Sankt Hansgade 23, 4Phone
Display graphical dialog boxes fro
Versions of packages eclipse recommends:
pn eclipse-gcj none (no description available)
eclipse suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
___ | Christian Holm Christensen
'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: x86_64
Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
___ | Christian Holm Christensen
Package: tomcat8-user
Version: 8.0.32-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
with tomcat8-instance-create it is relatively easy to setup a new Tomcat
instance. Since that instance is private to a user it isn't started
automatically, but instead has to be started and stopped via the
startup.sh and
81 matches
Mail list logo
