On Tue, 11 Nov 08 10:29, Ted Elly Hansen wrote:
I have just installed kde4.1.2 following the procedure in
http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/experimental.html
At some point in the installation, all my ~.kde/share/apps/ files got
deleted
and were not replaced.
Nope, not at all. (At least
On Fri, 30 Jan 09 14:26, Matthias wrote:
Hi!
While investigating another problem I found this entry in /var/log/daemon.log
kdm_greet[1327]: Cannot open default user face
Isn't this just a stupid pixmap which could be shown?
At least it has nothing to do with ConsoleKit. This message is
Hi all!
As you all know Lenny is near, which also means that our 4.2 packages will
enter Unstable in the very near future. Until today, we still have not decided
how to handle KDEHOME.
The current situation is, that KDE 3 applications use ~/.kde and KDE 4
applications use ~/.kde4. The problem
I meant Squeeze and not Lenny for sure.
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 22:53:42 Armin Berres wrote:
Hi all!
As you all know Lenny is near, which also means that our 4.2 packages will
enter Unstable in the very near future. Until today, we still have not
decided how to handle KDEHOME
On Thu, 05 Feb 09 14:10, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Modestas Vainius [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:27:56 +0200]:
The second group of users managed to migrate from .kde to .kde4. They
should be able to migrate back as well.
Probably they will if we let all of them know that they should do that.
On Tue, 03 Feb 09 22:53, Armin Berres wrote:
Hi all!
As you all know Lenny is near, which also means that our 4.2 packages will
enter Unstable in the very near future. Until today, we still have not
decided
how to handle KDEHOME.
The current situation is, that KDE 3 applications use
On Tue, 19 May 09 20:41, trig...@space-based.de wrote:
What do you think?
So, no feedback here so far, we are really more IRC than mailinglist
users.
What I understand so far is, that installing presubj files for all
packages is not an option, because e.g. people get used to simply ignore
the
On Tue, 26 May 09 10:00, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Hello,
On 2009 m. May 26 d., Tuesday 05:44:25 Armin Berres wrote:
with the template provided by Modestas. Is this our new policy? Do we
officially not forward bugreports anymore (at least as long as we have
no Bugsqad) and tell people
On Tue, 19 May 09 19:59, trig...@space-based.de wrote:
1) packaging-bug: These bugs are our fault and should be addressed by us.
Maybe packaging-bug is not the best description, but tagging of bugs we
should have a closer look at, because there is a good chance that we
should try to fix them