On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 13:14:41 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
First it was claimed that git-buildpackage did not work with the new
source format. [...]
Here you raise the more relevant concern if the new format is beneficial
or brings mors hassle.
git-buildpackage defines a couple of
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 09:24:02PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Sorry for answering privately.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 22:20, Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 02:48, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:28:25PM -0400, Felipe
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 01:30:21AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi!
Is it ok with you that I repackage from the current vcs-tarball to
pristine-(or-repackaged)-tarball + vcs-patch?
I'm not sure if I'm qualified to give an answer that respects all
implications of this question. I also
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 12:13:46PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 07:38:13PM +, j...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
Add patch 1002 fixing wscript files to support separately
packaged waf 1.5.10.
Now that you know that ./waf is clean and given that it'll
FYI: The status of the libquicktime source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2:1.1.4-1
Current version: 2:1.1.5-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Accepted:
audacity-data_1.3.12-2_all.deb
to main/a/audacity/audacity-data_1.3.12-2_all.deb
audacity-dbg_1.3.12-2_amd64.deb
to main/a/audacity/audacity-dbg_1.3.12-2_amd64.deb
audacity_1.3.12-2.debian.tar.bz2
to main/a/audacity/audacity_1.3.12-2.debian.tar.bz2
audacity_1.3.12-2.dsc
to
FYI: The status of the libffado source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.0.0-1
Current version: 2.0.0+svn1806-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the libass source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.8-1
Current version: 0.9.9-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 23:00:18 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
Different approach: make us the jackd2 repository. ;) So we simply use
git, wildly patch whatever we want, no need to wait for upstream to
apply my patches and pull from their svn repo from time to time. ;)
This way, we can ship
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 09:03:19PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:04:11 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Is it really too much that simple things like 'build clean' leave
a 'clean' working directory?!
I believe that I could make a CDBS snippet that cleans up
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 09:16:26PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 23:00:18 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
Different approach: make us the jackd2 repository. ;) So we simply
use git, wildly patch whatever we want, no need to wait for upstream
to apply my patches and pull
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 21:29:21 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Very well. I will have a look at implementing such hack, then.
How about this:
commit b5c4390b23f3df0bc92166cb24f9ea120992d628
Author: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de
Date: Sun Apr 4 22:33:51 2010 +0200
unpatch quilt
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:06:34PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 21:29:21 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Very well. I will have a look at implementing such hack, then.
How about this:
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index bf5eb38..5886dcb 100755
---
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 10:53:21PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 22:34:16 (CEST), j...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-jack-audio-connection-kit (1.9.5+svn3977-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+jack-audio-connection-kit
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 18:34, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:06:34PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 21:29:21 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Very well. I will have a look at implementing such hack, then.
How about this:
diff
15 matches
Mail list logo
