Puh, here goes another lengthy mail...
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 20:31:46 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:25, torbenh torb...@gmx.de wrote:
adi said that you somehow seem to believe that
there cant be virtual packages containing libraries.
this is not true.
if you
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 22:02:14 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I think others have tried pointing it out to me already, and it begins
to get through my thick skull: Even if both ABI and API is compatible
across implementations, it is _application_ ABI and API - the daemon use
a _different
aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc
aeolus_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
___
Accepted:
aeolus_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
to main/a/aeolus/aeolus_0.8.4-2.diff.gz
aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc
to main/a/aeolus/aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc
aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
to main/a/aeolus/aeolus_0.8.4-2_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
aeolus_0.8.4-2.dsc - source sound
Your message dated Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:47:09 +
with message-id e1o3s1t-0004ty...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#553630: fixed in aeolus 0.8.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #553630,
regarding [aeolus] FTBFS with binutils-gold
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
lash_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lash_0.5.4.0-1.dsc
lash_0.5.4.0.orig.tar.gz
lash_0.5.4.0-1.debian.tar.gz
lash-doc_0.5.4.0-1_all.deb
liblash-dev_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb
lashd_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb
lash-bin_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb
Accepted:
lash-bin_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb
to main/l/lash/lash-bin_0.5.4.0-1_amd64.deb
lash-doc_0.5.4.0-1_all.deb
to main/l/lash/lash-doc_0.5.4.0-1_all.deb
lash_0.5.4.0-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/l/lash/lash_0.5.4.0-1.debian.tar.gz
lash_0.5.4.0-1.dsc
to main/l/lash/lash_0.5.4.0-1.dsc
Hello Jonas,
thank you for your amazing work.
best regards
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Warnings:
Could not copy ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206.orig.tar.gz to holding; will attempt
to find in DB later
ignoring ffmpeg-debian_0.svn20080206.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the
archive.
Notes:
Mapping stable-security to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail
=== bristol:
= Missing build(s) on kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
This might need manual action from your side.
See
Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
stop right here.
the library and the daemon are tied together.
the protocol between jackd and libjack is NOT fixed.
(basically i consider it a mistake to even have libjack and jackd in
different packages) but
hi9
Dear friends,
I'm sorry, wasted your valuable time, we are chinese a major
international trading electronics
wholesale company.
Our company's electronic products have the best quality, cheapest price
and best service.
If you have time to buy 5 products that can free you of the
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 22:16:28 (CEST), DDPOMail robot wrote:
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail
=== bristol:
= Missing build(s) on kfreebsd-amd64
13 matches
Mail list logo
