I am having the same problem since the upgrade to 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502
(see output[2] of mplayer). Output of `reportbug --template mplayer`
included[1].
--Adam
[1] $ reportbug --template mplayer
[...]
Package: mplayer
Version: 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-1
Severity: wishlist
-- System
I have still the same problem as in the first report of this thread, now
with audacity 1.3.12.
Kernel: 2.6.33.2
Debian-Sid 26.04.2010.
So I return to audacity 1.3.5 again.
Changing the prferences ( bit-rate, frequenz-sample-rate) has no effect.
wkauz
Hi!
Is it just me or is audacity broken in 9 out of 10 cases?
I think it's the most overrated audio application ever, its portaudio is
a pure mess, either playback or recording doesn't work as expected,
random freezes on various platforms and so on.
If I were a company's QA department, I'd
±¾¹«Ë¾³¤ÆÚÓи÷Àà¨Q°l
dƯ©¶ÔÍ⡺´ú¡â¿ª¡»136¨H8689£¤5587ÖÓÏÈÉú
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 08:40:58 (CEST), Adam wrote:
AO: [pulse] 48000Hz 2ch s16be (2 bytes per sample)
Assertion 'channels 0' failed at pulse/volume.c:76, function
pa_cvolume_set(). Aborting.
This assertion doesn't look like it comes from mplayer, but rather from
libpulse. In fact, after
FYI: The status of the bristol source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.40.6-1
Current version: 0.60.0-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
Accepted:
bristol-data_0.60.2-1_all.deb
to main/b/bristol/bristol-data_0.60.2-1_all.deb
bristol_0.60.2-1.diff.gz
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.2-1.diff.gz
bristol_0.60.2-1.dsc
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.2-1.dsc
bristol_0.60.2-1_amd64.deb
to main/b/bristol/bristol_0.60.2-1_amd64.deb
Package: idjc
Version: 0.8.2-1
Severity: important
After the last Update of idjc and jack, idjc doesnt start up anymore with error
Message:
Mixer reports a segmentation fault
mixer crashed
something bad happened and IDJC could not continue
Other programs using jack still work great. So I think
ladspa-sdk_1.13-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.dsc
ladspa-sdk_1.13.orig.tar.gz
ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.diff.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 18:21, Archive Administrator
d...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote:
ladspa-sdk_1.13-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.dsc
ladspa-sdk_1.13.orig.tar.gz
ladspa-sdk_1.13-1.diff.gz
Sorry about this, I confused my dput
Reject Reasons:
source only uploads are not supported.
Source package ladspa-sdk does not have 'DM-Upload-Allowed: yes' in its most
recent version (1.1-6)
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Stefan Bischoff wrote:
Mixer reports a segmentation fault
mixer crashed
something bad happened and IDJC could not continue
Unfortunately, if /anything/ crashes in idjcmixer... you get
this same error message. So, some manner of backtrace is
really necc. in order to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 509330 src:liblo
Bug #509330 [liblo0-dev] liblo0-dev: New version (0.25) available
Bug reassigned from package 'liblo0-dev' to 'src:liblo'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions liblo/0.23-2.2.
reassign 543374 src:liblo
Bug #543374
Your message dated Wed, 5 May 2010 00:58:55 -0400
with message-id k2l8a0bda451005042158p9f132277ic5ba08ff77c6...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line 0.26 was uploaded a while ago
has caused the Debian Bug report #509330,
regarding liblo0-dev: New version (0.25) available
to be marked as done.
This
14 matches
Mail list logo
