Hi.
On the audacious forum, Andrei Alin proposed a patch for this.
I tried to include it in the audacious-plugins source package (I rewrote
it, using autoconf for regenerate the configure file). It builds fine
and the ffaudio plugin is enabled again (not enabled in the 3.2-1).
I don't know
blender_2.61-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
blender_2.61-2.dsc
blender_2.61-2.debian.tar.gz
blender_2.61-2_amd64.deb
blender-dbg_2.61-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
blender-dbg_2.61-2_amd64.deb
to main/b/blender/blender-dbg_2.61-2_amd64.deb
blender_2.61-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/b/blender/blender_2.61-2.debian.tar.gz
blender_2.61-2.dsc
to main/b/blender/blender_2.61-2.dsc
blender_2.61-2_amd64.deb
to main/b/blender/blender_2.61-2_amd64.deb
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:32:40 +
with message-id e1rrage-0007az...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#654395: fixed in blender 2.61-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #654395,
regarding [blender] Segmentation fault on startup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:32:40 +
with message-id e1rrage-0007ac...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#654428: fixed in blender 2.61-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #654428,
regarding blender: FTBFS: uses i386/amd64 specific register definitions on all
architectures
to be
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:32:40 +
with message-id e1rrage-0007ak...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#656502: fixed in blender 2.61-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #656502,
regarding blender: [FTBFS] Does not build with libav 0.8~beta2
to be marked as done.
This means
On Sa, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:46:46 (CET), Cyril Lavier wrote:
Hi.
On the audacious forum, Andrei Alin proposed a patch for this.
I tried to include it in the audacious-plugins source package (I rewrote
it, using autoconf for regenerate the configure file). It builds fine
and the ffaudio
FYI: The status of the libav source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4:0.7.3-2
Current version: 4:0.8-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the mplayer source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn33713-5
Current version: 2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing
FYI: The status of the rtaudio source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 4.0.10~ds0-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 657245 + squeeze
Bug #657245 [blender] blender: possible dfsg violation in release/windows/
subdirectory
Added tag(s) squeeze.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
657245:
FYI: The status of the gavl source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.2.0-3
Current version: 1.2.0-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 657245 2.49.2~dfsg-2
Bug #657245 [blender] blender: possible dfsg violation in release/windows/
subdirectory
Bug Marked as found in versions blender/2.49.2~dfsg-2.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 657245 2.59-1
Bug #657245 [blender] blender: possible dfsg violation in release/windows/
subdirectory
Bug Marked as fixed in versions blender/2.59-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
657245:
On 01/28/2012 05:26 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sa, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:46:46 (CET), Cyril Lavier wrote:
Hi.
On the audacious forum, Andrei Alin proposed a patch for this.
I tried to include it in the audacious-plugins source package (I rewrote
it, using autoconf for regenerate the
Package: src:lives
Version: 1.6.0~ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the
.
PDFOnline-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Sa, Jan 28, 2012 at 18:41:06 (CET), Cyril Lavier wrote:
[...]
Hi.
I didn't choose anything, I just took the patch which Andrei did, just
rewrote it and applied it to the sources. But I agree with your comment,
as I don't know why he chose those particular version.
I see. Can you ask
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 648431 pending
Bug #648431 [src:toonloop] toonloop: clutter-gtk-0.10/libchamplain-0.8 removal
Added tag(s) pending.
tags 622554 pending
Bug #622554 [toonloop] New Upstream toonloop 2.1.10
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:59 PM, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit c3e7b047c8a73f08cac3f5058c7b3c1bce8013d6
Author: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz
Date: Sat Jan 28 22:03:18 2012 +0100
Symbols file added
2012/1/28 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:59 PM, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit c3e7b047c8a73f08cac3f5058c7b3c1bce8013d6
Author: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz
Date: Sat Jan 28
On 01/28/2012 07:51 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sa, Jan 28, 2012 at 18:41:06 (CET), Cyril Lavier wrote:
[...]
Hi.
I didn't choose anything, I just took the patch which Andrei did, just
rewrote it and applied it to the sources. But I agree with your comment,
as I don't know why he chose
toonloop_2.1.18-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
toonloop_2.1.18-1.dsc
toonloop_2.1.18.orig.tar.gz
toonloop_2.1.18-1.debian.tar.gz
toonloop_2.1.18-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
toonloop_2.1.18-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/t/toonloop/toonloop_2.1.18-1.debian.tar.gz
toonloop_2.1.18-1.dsc
to main/t/toonloop/toonloop_2.1.18-1.dsc
toonloop_2.1.18-1_amd64.deb
to main/t/toonloop/toonloop_2.1.18-1_amd64.deb
toonloop_2.1.18.orig.tar.gz
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
toonloop_2.1.18-1_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database,
Your message dated Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:52:00 +
with message-id e1rrgbk-0001yv...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#622554: fixed in toonloop 2.1.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #622554,
regarding New Upstream toonloop 2.1.10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
package: toonloop
severity: serious
version: 2.0.6-2
tags: patch
Toonloop FTBFS on armel and armhf because clutter is built against
opengl es there.
Patch is attatched, it's messy because the autotools regen stuff is in
there, you might want to split that into a different patch or remove it
27 matches
Mail list logo
