unmerge 656850 659165
found 656850 1:0.2.1+git20111208.63e308d-2
stop
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
severity 656850 normal
fixed 656850 1:0.2.1+git20111208.63e308d-2
forcemerge 656850 659165
stop
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Micah Gersten
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote:
o_O Where does this come from? The project page still lists 1.3.14 as
current version.
As far as I can see, it comes from here:
http://code.google.com/p/audacity/downloads/list
--
Alessio Treglia |
audiofile_0.3.3-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
audiofile_0.3.3-3.dsc
audiofile_0.3.3-3.debian.tar.gz
audiofile-tools_0.3.3-3_amd64.deb
libaudiofile-dev_0.3.3-3_amd64.deb
libaudiofile1_0.3.3-3_amd64.deb
libaudiofile-dbg_0.3.3-3_amd64.deb
Package: vlc
Version: 1.1.13-1+b1
Severity: normal
I install vlc from testing to get support for WEBM codec (so have mixed
squeeze/wheezy environment).
If I run vlc on any file after closing it lock terminal and would not quit:
xterm# vlc my.avi
VLC media player 1.1.3 The Luggage (revision
Accepted:
audiofile-tools_0.3.3-3_amd64.deb
to main/a/audiofile/audiofile-tools_0.3.3-3_amd64.deb
audiofile_0.3.3-3.debian.tar.gz
to main/a/audiofile/audiofile_0.3.3-3.debian.tar.gz
audiofile_0.3.3-3.dsc
to main/a/audiofile/audiofile_0.3.3-3.dsc
libaudiofile-dbg_0.3.3-3_amd64.deb
to
Bump :)
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer | quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
Bump :)
Thanks for the reminder. We really should get this update out RSN.
I've updated the mplayer2 parts now. I'm unsure if we should keep the
lame entry, I guess most people have noticed that we have it by now.
OTOH,
Am 20.02.2012 13:51, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I've updated the mplayer2 parts now. I'm unsure if we should keep the
lame entry, I guess most people have noticed that we have it by now.
OTOH, I probably won't do harm either.
It won't harm, but could get extended to mention xvid and x264 as
Oh thanks for the info, i didn't remember the repo and BTW quite nice
that you modernized debian/rules :)
But regarding the upload: How long do you plan to wait for it, because
the pending changes are also mainly to the packaging (right?) and we
have already have a Qt4 patched package out in
FYI: The status of the amsynth source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.2.3-3
Current version: 1.3.0-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
Accepted:
audacious-plugins-data_3.2-2_all.deb
to main/a/audacious-plugins/audacious-plugins-data_3.2-2_all.deb
audacious-plugins-dbg_3.2-2_amd64.deb
to main/a/audacious-plugins/audacious-plugins-dbg_3.2-2_amd64.deb
audacious-plugins_3.2-2.debian.tar.gz
to
Accepted:
audacious-plugins-data_3.2.1-1_all.deb
to main/a/audacious-plugins/audacious-plugins-data_3.2.1-1_all.deb
audacious-plugins-dbg_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/a/audacious-plugins/audacious-plugins-dbg_3.2.1-1_amd64.deb
audacious-plugins_3.2.1-1.debian.tar.gz
to
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:17:19 +
with message-id e1rzabn-00073u...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#589756: fixed in audacious-plugins 3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #589756,
regarding Audacious does not provide RoarAudio plugin
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:17:19 +
with message-id e1rzabn-00073c...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#636847: fixed in audacious-plugins 3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #636847,
regarding audacious-plugins: Build doesn't define the exact set of features
enabled
to be
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:17:19 +
with message-id e1rzabn-00073h...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#641701: fixed in audacious-plugins 3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #641701,
regarding audacious-plugins: Plugin ffaudio vanished, no plugin for wma
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:17:19 +
with message-id e1rzabn-00073l...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#644554: fixed in audacious-plugins 3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #644554,
regarding audacious-plugins: mp4 files not closed after playing
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:17:19 +
with message-id e1rzabn-00073s...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#645347: fixed in audacious-plugins 3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #645347,
regarding audacious-plugins: [regression] is no longer able to play audio CDs
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:17:19 +
with message-id e1rzabn-00073w...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#650847: fixed in audacious-plugins 3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #650847,
regarding audacious-plugins: No TTA (True Audio) support.
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:17:19 +
with message-id e1rzabn-00073w...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#650847: fixed in audacious-plugins 3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #650847,
regarding audacious-plugins: No TTA (True Audio) support.
to be marked as done.
This means
Il 18/02/2012 12:58, Alessio Treglia ha scritto:
* libtc/strlcat.c is licensed under ISC.
Fixed and re-uploaded to NEW, thank you!
libtc/strlcat.c is still not mentioned in copyright file.
Consider adjusting it in your next upload.
___
On 12-02-20 at 01:51pm, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
- is jack1 expected to work with session handling?
As I recall, that was exactly a major selling point for JACK2 as opposed
to JACK1 when JACK2 was introduced, and I haven't heard of major changes
to JACK1 since then.
- What does the user
Package: mplayer
Version: 2:1.0~rc3++final.dfsg1-1
Severity: important
mplayer segfaulted trying to play a DVD. I installed mplayer-dbg and
got the following backtrace from gdb:
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/mplayer dvd://
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
MPlayer
Your message dated Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:17:21 +
with message-id e1rzbxt-0005eu...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#149568: fixed in transcode 3:1.1.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #149568,
regarding ITP: transcode -- A video stream processing tool
to be marked as done.
This means
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote:
libtc/strlcat.c is still not mentioned in copyright file.
I added it to debian/copyright just before uploading transcode the
last time [1].
Thank you so much for the great work!
[1] http://goo.gl/A5JdR
--
Alessio
Package: vlc-plugin-notify
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: important
Coin,
After upgrading from 1.1.13-1+b1, the (default) interface window
opens, but stays empty without any widget but the background color,
and the whole application stays blocked forever (see the attached
debug logs). These
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
the LV2 and ladish section leaves me these questions unanswered:
- is jack1 expected to work with session handling?
No, ladish needs jack2.
- What does the user need to do to use the new session handling code?
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
A few minor things I've noticed:
BitsFrom says LV2 version whereas Policy/LV2 says version 3.
Squeeze supports LV2-rev3, Wheezy currently provides LV2-rev6, I've
fixed that sub-page.
New [ladish] packages are currently
2011/4/26 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
I've filled LV2 and ladish sections, reviewing is welcome!
Looks good to me.
What's happened with dh_lv2config?
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks good to me.
What's happened with dh_lv2config?
Not needed anymore, installation of extensions and related links is
handled by respective buildsystems.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian
2012/2/20 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
Bump :)
I am not well oriented in video related packages,but what about gpac,
transcode maybe others gmerlin?
Are they worth to mention? They looks like crucial packages.
mira
___
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not well oriented in video related packages,but what about gpac,
transcode maybe others gmerlin?
Are they worth to mention? They looks like crucial packages.
Of course they are!
--
Alessio Treglia |
2012/2/21 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not well oriented in video related packages,but what about gpac,
transcode maybe others gmerlin?
Are they worth to mention? They looks like crucial packages.
Of
32 matches
Mail list logo
