FYI: The status of the jack-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20101210-2.1
Current version: 20131226-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Hi,
apologies for the delay. Finally found time to investigate the random
failures -- turned out to be reading a variable that's uninitialized
after my original patch. The attached fix works for me.
--
Anton Khirnov
From 414522d5049a230e71a2c2fef45a6b525d6a9803 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
Hello,
I updated harvid package ... can someone upload or make DM flag for me? ;)
best regards
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
I just reported a bug on the usage of audio group. bug #766914
As it seems to be considered a bad group for users to belong to, and the
fact that jackd packages expects the users to be apart of it, I propose
to remove audio as a user default and create a new group for jack
specifically.
ffado
The bug got closed before I had the time to blink, so I'm taking the
discussion to debian-devel list.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 09:07 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
I just reported a bug on the usage of audio group. bug #766914
As it seems to be considered a bad group for users to belong to, and the
Hi Kaj,
Quoting Kaj Ailomaa (2014-10-26 21:07:17)
I just reported a bug on the usage of audio group. bug #766914
As it seems to be considered a bad group for users to belong to, and
the fact that jackd packages expects the users to be apart of it, I
propose to remove audio as a user
Quoting Kaj Ailomaa (2014-10-26 21:29:40)
The bug got closed before I had the time to blink, so I'm taking the
discussion to debian-devel list.
Yeah, I you might know I am no Ubuntu fan, but that bug closure seems
rude (even) to me: As I read it, you only _support_ your point by
referencing
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 09:32 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Seems to me that goal of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/TheAudioGroup
is to move from POSIX groups to dynamically allocated access rights.
Would it perhaps be possible and better to similarly allocate the right
to realtime
Quoting Kaj Ailomaa (2014-10-26 22:27:33)
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 09:32 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Seems to me that goal of
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/TheAudioGroup is to move from POSIX
groups to dynamically allocated access rights.
Would it perhaps be possible and better to
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 11:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Not sure if you still consider use of classic POSIX group for this, just
renaing to be another than audio. If you do, then let me try again to
explain my point:
The Ubuntu wiki page mentions the reason for avoiding static Audio
Quoting Kaj Ailomaa (2014-10-26 23:39:38)
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 11:14 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Not sure if you still consider use of classic POSIX group for this,
just renaing to be another than audio. If you do, then let me try
again to explain my point:
The Ubuntu wiki page
Sorry for the delay. Granted
On 26 Oct 2014 15:37, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I updated harvid package ... can someone upload or make DM flag for me? ;)
best regards
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
harvid_0.7.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
harvid_0.7.5-1.dsc
harvid_0.7.5.orig.tar.gz
harvid_0.7.5-1.debian.tar.xz
harvid_0.7.5-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
2014-10-27 4:35 GMT+01:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com:
Sorry for the delay. Granted
Thank you! Uploaded ;)
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:17:43 +0100
Source: harvid
Binary: harvid
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.7.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
15 matches
Mail list logo
