2015-05-31 19:55 GMT+02:00 Ross Gammon r...@the-gammons.net:
On 05/14/2015 01:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hello,
qxgedit is almost ready.
I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;(
I: qxgedit: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/qxgedit
W: qxgedit:
zyne_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
zyne_0.1.2-1.dsc
zyne_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz
zyne_0.1.2-1.debian.tar.xz
zyne_0.1.2-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
x42-plugins_20150530-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
x42-plugins_20150530-1.dsc
x42-plugins_20150530.orig.tar.xz
x42-plugins_20150530-1.debian.tar.xz
x42-plugins_20150530-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
On 05/14/2015 01:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hello,
qxgedit is almost ready.
I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;(
I: qxgedit: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/qxgedit
W: qxgedit: hardening-no-relro
Hi Ross,
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Ross Gammon r...@the-gammons.net wrote:
On 05/31/2015 02:58 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Well, it really boils down what we want the team's reputation to be.
The rule tests whether or not there is *team* commitment, and for that
you need *more than one
zyne_0.1.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
zyne_0.1.2-1.dsc
zyne_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz
zyne_0.1.2-1.debian.tar.xz
zyne_0.1.2-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 19:40 +, bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote:
Package: src:freetuxtv
Severity: serious
version: 0.6.6~dfsg1-1
user: lintian-ma...@debian.org
usertags: license-problem-cc-by-nc-sa
Hi,
Could you please clarify the license of:
data/icons/hicolor_apps_32x32_freetuxtv.svg
On 05/31/2015 07:55 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Hi Ross,
[...] Quick response!
I agree in principle. But for me, having two uploaders does not test if
there is team commitment.
I see two ways how to interpret this sentiment:
a) the check is not strict enough, and misses many too many
2015-05-31 21:39 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill james...@cowgill.org.uk:
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 19:55 +0200, Ross Gammon wrote:
On 05/14/2015 01:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hello,
qxgedit is almost ready.
I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;(
I: qxgedit:
On 05/31/2015 02:58 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Well, it really boils down what we want the team's reputation to be.
The rule tests whether or not there is *team* commitment, and for that
you need *more than one person* actively caring for a package. If a
package fails the two active uploaders
Hi,
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 19:55 +0200, Ross Gammon wrote:
On 05/14/2015 01:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hello,
qxgedit is almost ready.
I'm having this two warnings which I am not able currently fix ;(
I: qxgedit: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/qxgedit
configure.ac messes
Hi, this is an upstream bugs, these file was supposed to be the copy of the
hicolor_apps_scalable_freetuxtv.svg.
I need to fix this in the next version.
2015-05-31 20:36 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill james...@cowgill.org.uk:
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 19:40 +, bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote:
Package:
RISPOSTA TRAMITE QUESTA EMAIL( marklukunk...@qq.com)
Ciao, sono sempre in contatto con voi per quanto riguarda il nostro cliente
tarda, che morм senza una volontа, ci ha lasciato la somma di US$ 17,3 milioni
nel nostro istituto finanziario. Richiedere con urgenza l'approvazione di
binary:zyne is NEW.
source:zyne is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routinely processed
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 22:00:21 +0200
Source: x42-plugins
Binary: x42-plugins
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 20150530-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers
libav_11.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libav_11.4-1.dsc
libav_11.4.orig.tar.xz
libav_11.4-1.debian.tar.xz
libav-dbg_11.4-1_amd64.deb
libav-doc_11.4-1_all.deb
libav-tools_11.4-1_amd64.deb
libavcodec-dev_11.4-1_amd64.deb
So if anybody is interested ... I think package is ready for review and upload.
best regards
mira
2015-05-31 23:21 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com:
2015-05-31 21:39 GMT+02:00 James Cowgill james...@cowgill.org.uk:
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 19:55 +0200, Ross Gammon wrote:
On
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Ross Gammon r...@the-gammons.net wrote:
If someone suggests a new package is brought into the team, and it is
accepted, then the team is making a commitment at that point.
How can you determine team commitment if only a single person is
working on the
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 13:11:50 -0400
Source: libav
Binary: libav-tools libav-dbg libav-doc libavutil54 libavcodec56 libavdevice55
libavformat56 libavfilter5 libswscale3 libavutil-dev libavcodec-dev
libavdevice-dev
Click here for the web version of this message
Click here for the web version of this message
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2015-06-01 00:36:32)
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Ross Gammon r...@the-gammons.net wrote:
If someone suggests a new package is brought into the team, and it
is accepted, then the team is making a commitment at that point.
How can you determine team commitment
Hi there,
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 18:46 +0200 schrieb Niklaas Baudet von
Gersdorff:
I already looked for a way to do so but remained unsuccessful. What is
the best way to achieve this once the packages have already been
installed from deb-multimedia.org ?
please follow the advice here
Hi again,
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 05:12 +0200 schrieb Bernhard Übelacker:
= 0xb76df6c9 init_xrpow_core_sse+105:movaps %xmm0,0x20(%esp)
Yes, this movaps seems to be a SSE instruction.
Also the changes in the previous patch should not change the instructions
but only the
Am Sonntag, den 31.05.2015, 08:58 -0400 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
If the majority of the packages in team pkg-multimedia are effectively
taken care of by a single person, how is that package simply not team
maintained at all?
Not yet.
As it stands, the rule already applies to the first
Am Montag, den 01.06.2015, 07:05 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
The main difference between the packages in wheezy and jessie is that
the former is not built with SSE instructions at all. So, it seems that
we have not intriduced a bug, but merely uncovered a bug that was well
hidden before,
Dear sirs,
Learning from internet as you are in the market of light duty shelving, may I
have your attention to the following content?
Thanks, and we are sorry for the impertinence.
We are one of the leading supplier of steel section for racking shelving in
China.
We have various of
FYI: The status of the python-pyo source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.7-2.1
Current version: 0.7.5-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
Package: src:freetuxtv
Severity: serious
version: 0.6.6~dfsg1-1
user: lintian-ma...@debian.org
usertags: license-problem-cc-by-nc-sa
Hi,
Could you please clarify the license of:
data/icons/hicolor_apps_32x32_freetuxtv.svg
claimed on source to be cc-by-nc-sa, thus non free.
If it is really a
Dear Reinhard,
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 17:54 -0400 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
- Fabian, you were counted as in favor of switching to FFmpeg. In the
light of the most recent posting from Andreas, the mails that Balint
kindly forwarded, and my thoughts, would you approve and support
moving
2015-05-27 9:26 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath fab...@debian.org:
Am Dienstag, den 26.05.2015, 14:38 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
I think the rule is useless. It doesn't prevent us from having two persons on
Uploaders and both are MIA. I'd rather orphan/remove the packages from the
team that
Hi Reinhard,
On 30.05.2015 23:54, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Andeas already proposed a transition plan [1] and already submitted
several bugs.
If we decide to switch to ffmpeg, I think this is the best proposal so far.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
2015-05-30 23:54 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com:
Where is Reinhard's original mail? I can't find it.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer |
2015-05-30 23:54 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com:
...
I'd rather keep the packaging of the package that is currently called
libav, because on many architectures, it compiles multiple flavors
with hardware optimized flavors (on i386 for instance, there is a
flavor without latest
[CC'ed are the maintainers of reverse (build-)dependencies.
Please reply only to pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org.
If you're interested in this discussion, consider subscribing that list.]
Hi,
On 29.04.2015 20:56, Alessio Treglia wrote:
I am afraid that I have to revive this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Debian community,
First of all sorry to CC so many of you but I don't know who is on
debian-multimedia list.
During some discussion in ITP bug #777220 it came to attention to some
members of our community that we have many packages that
It looks like this might be possible now.
$ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org dak rm -Rn emacs23
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
emacs23 | 23.4+1-4.1 | source
emacs23 | 23.4+1-4.1+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64,
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc,
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2015-05-30 23:54:46)
- Jonas Allessio, Balint counted both of you as in favor of Libav.
Did your opinion/impression change in the last couple of weeks?
No, neither the new input in the past couple weeks nor repition of old
input have made me change opinion on the
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote:
On 26 May 2015 at 09:38, Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org wrote:
On 2015-05-26 14:33:41, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
hmm, nobody ever answered to this email.
mira's recent mail regarding a 2nd
39 matches
Mail list logo
