Source: libffado
Version: 2.2.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #778777
Hi,
I just wondered about this and forgot to see beforehand whether a
bugreport already existed, so my patch differs. It’s shorter, less
intrusive and more in the spirit of the original code though, I
think, so I’m attaching it.
I’ve
binary:lame-dbg is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routinely processed through to the
lame_3.99.5+repack1-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lame_3.99.5+repack1-9.dsc
lame_3.99.5+repack1-9.debian.tar.xz
lame-dbg_3.99.5+repack1-9_amd64.deb
lame-doc_3.99.5+repack1-9_all.deb
lame_3.99.5+repack1-9_amd64.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
hi,
great!
welcome.
On 2015-06-11 13:14, Joël Krähemann wrote:
have created an alioth account
https://alioth.debian.org/account/register.php. -
that is very nice ;-)
would you mind sharing your user name, so we can actually add your
digital
ffmpeg_2.7-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ffmpeg_2.7-1.dsc
ffmpeg_2.7.orig.tar.gz
ffmpeg_2.7-1.debian.tar.xz
ffmpeg-dbg_2.7-1_i386.deb
ffmpeg-doc_2.7-1_all.deb
ffmpeg_2.7-1_i386.deb
libavcodec-ffmpeg-dev_2.7-1_i386.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:47:35 +0200
Source: ffmpeg
Binary: ffmpeg qt-faststart ffmpeg-dbg ffmpeg-doc libavcodec-ffmpeg56
libavcodec-ffmpeg-dev libavdevice-ffmpeg56 libavdevice-ffmpeg-dev
libavfilter-ffmpeg5
Hi, my name is Joël Krähemann. I'm a long time debian user since 2003 and
having experience with other distributions like SuSE or fedora. I did
several times the linuxfromscratch.org guide. So I have a good
understanding how everthing fits together in GNU/Linux .
I'd like to become a debian
binary:calf-plugins is NEW.
source:calf is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routinely
2015-06-11 16:03 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
I forwarded them on .4.3.2014 to email fra...@arkhostings.com
Well, in that case you should put that address into the Forwarded: field.
I have never done
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
I forwarded them on .4.3.2014 to email fra...@arkhostings.com
Well, in that case you should put that address into the Forwarded: field.
Did they reply?
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-06-11 16:03 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
I forwarded them on .4.3.2014 to email fra...@arkhostings.com
Well, in that case
2015-06-11 18:02 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-06-11 16:03 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
I forwarded them
Hi,
thanks for maintaining and developing the audacity package!
I am on Debian/testing and just upgraded to audacity version 2.0.6
using apt. I just noticed two new problems:
1.)
The 'device bar' is suddenly empty, regardless of used audio backend
hi, esp ross,
i was having a look at the multimedia-blends package, and would like to
change the categorization of a few package i (co)maintain.
should i just go ahead and commit them, or does this require some
discussion?
furthermore, i noticed that the various tasks mainly use the *Depends*
On 11 June 2015 at 15:41, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
umlae...@debian.org wrote:
hi, esp ross,
i was having a look at the multimedia-blends package, and would like to
change the categorization of a few package i (co)maintain.
should i just go ahead and commit them, or does this require
Hi IOhannes,
On 06/11/2015 08:41 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
hi, esp ross,
i was having a look at the multimedia-blends package, and would like to
change the categorization of a few package i (co)maintain.
I was actually planning to send an update when I am finished sifting
2015-06-11 15:45 GMT+02:00 Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:58 PM, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 0af1ab82b34755ac4f370cef366754d105a3462f
Author: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz
Date:
invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-6.dsc
invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-6.debian.tar.xz
invada-studio-plugins-lv2_1.2.0+repack0-6_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:16:04 +0200
Source: invada-studio-plugins-lv2
Binary: invada-studio-plugins-lv2
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.2.0+repack0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:58 PM, mira-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
commit 0af1ab82b34755ac4f370cef366754d105a3462f
Author: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz
Date: Tue Mar 4 15:54:20 2014 +0100
Patch forwarded.
Who was
Hello,
I need DM flag for vocproc package to update it ;)
thank you
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
binary:vlevel is NEW.
source:vlevel is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routinely processed
lame_3.99.5+repack1-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lame_3.99.5+repack1-8.dsc
lame_3.99.5+repack1-8.debian.tar.xz
lame_3.99.5+repack1-8_amd64.deb
lame-doc_3.99.5+repack1-8_all.deb
libmp3lame0_3.99.5+repack1-8_amd64.deb
Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2015, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
So I guess I'll wait until someone specifically asks for it.
That's a good idea. In the libavcodec case the missing -extra package
would be considered a regression, but in the libavformat case noone
asked for smb support before.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 09:32:10 +0200
Source: lame
Binary: lame lame-doc libmp3lame0 libmp3lame-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 3.99.5+repack1-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian
Your message dated Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:50:09 +
with message-id e1z2xfz-ym...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#786438: fixed in lame 3.99.5+repack1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #786438,
regarding libmp3lame0: general protection error in libmp3lame.so.0.0.0
to be marked as done.
vlevel_0.5.1-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
vlevel_0.5.1-1~bpo8+1.dsc
vlevel_0.5.1-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.gz
vlevel_0.5.1-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
On 06/11/2015 09:44 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
furthermore, i noticed that the various tasks mainly use the *Depends*
relationship.
now i'm not an expert with blends, but personally i think that 'Depends'
should be avoided as much as possible (in general).
I think the web sentinel (task
On 06/11/2015 09:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
synthesis at all; darn - did i just here me volunteer to maintain a
puredata task?)
:)
I don't think we need per-application-ecosystem metapackages.
but right now the user does not have a possibility to install an entire
ecosystem like Pd's.
On 06/11/2015 09:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
The blends machinery automatically demotes all Depends to Recommends.
See the generated packages[1].
I'm not sure if Recommends are demoted to Suggests.
looks like it does for non-existing packages (e.g. boodler in
soundsynthesis).
gfmrdsa
On 06/11/2015 09:23 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 11 June 2015 at 15:41, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
umlae...@debian.org wrote:
anyhow: if i want to some record some audio, i would select the
recording task, which will installs by (among other things):
at least (at a first glance) 4
calf_0.0.60-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
calf_0.0.60-1~bpo8+1.dsc
calf_0.0.60-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.gz
calf-plugins_0.0.60-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
32 matches
Mail list logo
