Processed: fix the found version

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 878328 0.1.2~repack00.1.2~repack0-6 Bug #878328 {Done: Jaromír Mikeš } [src:midisnoop] midisnoop FTBFS on !amd64: x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/midisnoop: No such file or directory The source 'midisnoop' and version

Bug#878328: marked as done (midisnoop FTBFS on !amd64: x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/midisnoop: No such file or directory)

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2017 03:48:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#878328: fixed in midisnoop 0.1.2~repack0-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #878328, regarding midisnoop FTBFS on !amd64: x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/midisnoop: No such file or

midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-10-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 05:24:59 +0200 Source: midisnoop Binary: midisnoop Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1.2~repack0-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

Processed: Bug#878328 marked as pending

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 878328 pending Bug #878328 [src:midisnoop] midisnoop FTBFS on !amd64: x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/midisnoop: No such file or directory Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 878328:

Processing of midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-7_amd64.changes

2017-10-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-7.dsc midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-7.debian.tar.xz midisnoop-dbgsym_0.1.2~repack0-7_amd64.deb midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-7_amd64.buildinfo midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-7_amd64.deb

Bug#878347: supercollider: armel FTBFS and armhf baseline violation

2017-10-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: supercollider Version: 1:3.8.0~repack-1 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=supercollider=armel=1%3A3.8.0~repack-1=1507298859=0 ... cd "/<>/obj-arm-linux-gnueabi/external_libraries" && /usr/bin/c++ -DBOOST_CHRONO_HEADER_ONLY -DBOOST_NO_AUTO_PTR

Bug#878346: supercollider mustn't be built with SSE

2017-10-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: supercollider Version: 1:3.8.0~repack-1 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=supercollider=sid ... c++: error: unrecognized command line option '-msse'; did you mean '-fdse'? c++: error: unrecognized command line option '-msse'; did you mean '-fdse'? c++:

Processed: librem-dev causes FTBFS in baresip: conflicting types for goertzel_*

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:baresip Bug #878341 [librem-dev] librem-dev causes FTBFS in baresip: conflicting types for goertzel_* Added indication that 878341 affects src:baresip -- 878341: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878341 Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#878341: librem-dev causes FTBFS in baresip: conflicting types for goertzel_*

2017-10-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: librem-dev Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 src:baresip https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/baresip.html ... CC [M] build-x86_64/modules/g726/g726.o gcc -DRELEASE -Wall -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes

Bug#873647: libshout: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in Buster

2017-10-12 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Hi, this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens. [0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55 Sebastian

Bug#851084: crtmpserver: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

2017-10-12 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Hi, this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens. [0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55 Sebastian

Processed: #855251 does not need moreinfo

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 855251 - moreinfo Bug #855251 [easytag] easytag corrupt ogg files Bug #878009 [easytag] easytag fails to add tags to .ogg files Removed tag(s) moreinfo. Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#878329: sonic-visualiser FTBFS on i386:

2017-10-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: sonic-visualiser Version: 3.0.3~repack1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch sonic-visualiser FTBFS on i386: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sonic-visualiser=i386=3.0.3~repack1-1=1507156321=0 ... Have 10 ticks, expected 11 0: have -0.9 "-0.9", expected -1 "-1.0" 1: have -0.7

Bug#878328: midisnoop FTBFS on !amd64: x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/midisnoop: No such file or directory

2017-10-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: midisnoop Version: 0.1.2~repack00.1.2~repack0-6 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=midisnoop=sid ... debian/rules override_dh_auto_install make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' install -d /<>/debian/midisnoop/usr/bin/ install -m 755 -p

Processed: Bug#878009: easytag fails to add tags to .ogg files

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 878009 easytag Bug #878009 [src:easytag] easytag fails to add tags to .ogg files Bug reassigned from package 'src:easytag' to 'easytag'. No longer marked as found in versions easytag/2.4.3-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of

Bug#878009: easytag fails to add tags to .ogg files

2017-10-12 Thread James Cowgill
Control: forcemerge 855251 -1 Hi, On 12/10/17 15:48, Doug S wrote: > This is the output of ogginfo on an .ogg file I downloaded using youtube-dl > and edited with Easytag: > > New logical stream (#1, serial: 88c27610): type vorbis >> Vorbis headers parsed for stream 1, information follows... >>

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#878009: easytag fails to add tags to .ogg files

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forcemerge 855251 -1 Bug #855251 [easytag] easytag corrupt ogg files Unable to merge bugs because: package of #878009 is 'src:easytag' not 'easytag' Failed to forcibly merge 855251: Did not alter merged bugs. -- 855251:

Looking for sponsorship for dmedia

2017-10-12 Thread Olivier Aubert
Hi everyone Advene [1] is a video annotation tool, that was present in Debian but got removed before stretch release in 2015 because of dependencies on obsolete packages (gstreamer 0.10, python-rsvg...). Lack of time prevented me (as upstream) to cope with this update at the time. I had the

Bug#878324: directfb: Linux-specific libraries like *_fbdev.so are not included in libdirectfb-bin arm builds

2017-10-12 Thread Keith Kyzivat
Source: directfb Version: 1.2.10.0-8 Severity: important Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, When installing the Debian Stretch directfb package on an embedded armhf platform that has no X-Windows, I encountered both my application, and the dfbinfo application failing because it failed to find the

midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-10-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:00:53 +0200 Source: midisnoop Binary: midisnoop Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1.2~repack0-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers

Processing of midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-6_amd64.changes

2017-10-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-6.dsc midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-6.debian.tar.xz midisnoop-dbgsym_0.1.2~repack0-6_amd64.deb midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-6_amd64.buildinfo midisnoop_0.1.2~repack0-6_amd64.deb

Re: midisnoop - dh 10 - binary not installed

2017-10-12 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
2017-10-12 12:18 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš : while updating midisnoop package binary is not installed anymore with dh 10 > anybody can see what is a problem? > > make[3]: Entering directory '/build/midisnoop-0.1.2~repack0/src' > install -m 755 -p

Re: RFC: Enabling http transport of files to mpd within an mpd client?

2017-10-12 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Stuart Prescott (2017-10-12 11:14:28) > your opinions on the security implications of enabling an http server > within cantata (an mpd client) to send local files to mpd are desired. > The changes that Jonas describes are now in a new upstream release > that I'd like to upload soon. I

midisnoop - dh 10 - binary not installed

2017-10-12 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hi, while updating midisnoop package binary is not installed anymore with dh 10 anybody can see what is a problem? make[3]: Entering directory '/build/midisnoop-0.1.2~repack0/src' install -m 755 -p "../x86_64-linux-gnu/bin/midisnoop" "/usr/bin/midisnoop" ../install/build-desktop-file /usr/bin

RFC: Enabling http transport of files to mpd within an mpd client?

2017-10-12 Thread Stuart Prescott
Dear co-maintainers, your opinions on the security implications of enabling an http server within cantata (an mpd client) to send local files to mpd are desired. The changes that Jonas describes are now in a new upstream release that I'd like to upload soon. http://bugs.debian.org/872704 for

Re: Moiseenko Andrey's crtmpserver security patch

2017-10-12 Thread Debian/GNU
hi, On 2017-10-11 21:25, JSK MaaSoftware wrote: > Hello, Maintainers! > > I have found a security problem in crtmpserver in December 2015, still > exists. thanks for the patches. i only had a cursory glance, but have a remark: i guess some of the functionality you add could be easily

Bug#728772: Turnitin Plagiarism Checker account available

2017-10-12 Thread sabir shah
Turnitin Plagiarism Checker available If you think Turnitin store the file in the database, then you are wrong. Why? Read it below: There are two types of settings in Turnitin, One is known as repository setting, and another one is known as no repository. The institute’s use repository