-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
hi,
On 2015-09-22 12:26, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Reading at this discussion, I'd just want to mention that dispite
> this package is called "hydrogen-drumkits", it does install other
> stuffs as well, demo songs in
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:42:00 +0300
From: Artemiy Pavlov <arte...@sinevib.es>
To: "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" <umlae...@debian.org>
Hi again :-)
“just pick any and don't b
On 09/21/2015 04:29 PM, Artemiy Pavlov wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> Here is the list of kits that I can share via any license you like:
>
> - VariBreaks
> - HardElectro
> - Electric Empire
> - HipHop-1
> - HipHop-2
> - EasternHop
> - Synthie-1
>
thanks for the kind offer.
even though you allow use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-09-21 14:54, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
> Please go ahead. I do not know when I will have time to look at
> this, so do not wait on me.
>
afaict, sramacher has expressed his intention to take care of stk
"tonight" (sent ~5 mins after simons
On 2015-09-14 23:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hi Alessio, Jonas, others
>
> I jumped in to updating hydrogen-drumkits package ... I updated it and
> realize that it is really huge! :( ... About 250MB
> I think something so big doesn't make sense distribute in debian.
>
> What we should do with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-09-21 15:47, Artemiy Pavlov wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Some of the sounds in these drum kits were created by me, and some
> were taken from a collection of drum machine samples that one of my
> friends allowed to use. I can grant you any
share via any license you like:
- - VariBreaks
- - HardElectro
- - Electric Empire
- - HipHop-1
- - HipHop-2
- - EasternHop
- - Synthie-1
Artemiy.
Sent from my iPad
> On 21 Sep 2015, at 5:14 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
> <umlae...@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2015
rogen-drumkits" for the
Debian/GNU linux distribution (as part of the
"pkg-multimedia-maintainers", CCed).
Debian as a project is committed to deliver "free" (as in speech)
software and data to our users. whenever you install something from
Debian, you can be sure that y
On 2015-09-21 14:54, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
> Please go ahead. I do not know when I will have time to look at this,
> so do not wait on me.
afaik, sramacher has expressed his intention to take care of stk
"tonight" (sent ~5 mins after simons mail) to take care of STK.
so you might want to wait
On 2015-09-20 11:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug
>>> (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that should be
>>> raised to "important").
>>
>> I would remove it.
i'd like to hear adrian on this first.
>
> What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-09-17 10:34, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> So what we need now is to tune get-orig-source script to get only
> DFSG compatible drumkits? Can we also get copyright file in in orig
> tar ball?
the main problem i see here, is that the license fields
On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>
> So here's the suggestion. Instead of
>
>ardour -> a2
>ardour3 -> a3
>ardour4 -> a4
>
> I propose
>
>ardour -> a4
>ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie)
>drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) )
>
now
On 2015-09-15 00:20, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Yes but latest debian release from 2007 30MB now in 2015 250MB I
> am assuming that size still can rise in future. Also I believe that
> usually user using just couple of favorite drumkits and not need
> all of of them maybe. So I am thinking to safe
On 2015-09-15 10:15, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-09-15 9:46 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard :
>> If you mean encourage upstream to offer out-of-band download and then
>> _not_ package those drumkits for Debian to "safe packager's load" then I
>> find that a very bad idea: Our users
i can reproduce the problem.
attached you can find a backtrace.
however: the segfault seems to have gone in ardour-4 (as provided by the
"ardour" package).
i don't think fixing the problem is worth it, esp. since the "ardour3"
package will be removed from the archives in the (near?) future.
unable to reproduce this problem with ardour_1:4.2~dfsg-2
can you confirm that the problem has been fixed?
gfmasrd
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-09-14 05:55, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> 2015-09-13 22:38 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig
> :
>> On 09/13/2015 08:50 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>>> i'm also just building ardour, and if everything goes well
>>> will
On 2015-09-09 14:46, Marco Righi wrote:
> The problem is not resolved (the test are below).
>
> Regarding the hybrid configuration, I think it is a problem
> because there not exists the last version of a library but your are
> branching them so my Linux "lives" using some library from a branch
>
On 2015-09-09 09:52, Marco Righi wrote:
[...]
> inkscape : Depends: libatkmm-1.6-1 (>= 2.22.1) but it is not going to
> be installed
in the past few weeks, Debian has seen a major transition (of the core
components for any C++-related software in Debian) that affected *many*
packages and
On 09/09/2015 06:40 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any progress with this topic? Does any body contacted Richard Furse
> as has been suggested?
i have now.
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2015-September/036096.html
gcmsr
IOhannes
signature.asc
On 08/27/2015 07:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi IOhannes,
please add the missing license of tclpd-0.3.0\examples\colorpicker.tcl
to your debian/copyright.
thanks for catching that.
re-uploaded with the fixed debian/copyright.
gfmards
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
hi,
i wonder why lives has a *hard* dependency on frei0r-plugins.
will it refuse work if that set of plugins (that are dlopen()ed) are not
present on the system?
i would like to move it to 'Recommends', to allow for more flexibility
for installations.
i also wonder why there is an
On 08/22/2015 11:36 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi,
LICENSE.txt says it is GPL-2+ but the file header say it is only GPL-2.
Is this intentional?
i talked with upstream and they say that this is not intentional but
rather an oversight, and that they indeed intend the license to be GPL-2+.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-06-18 15:43, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
a very wild and uneducated check reveals that the build is
parallelized (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=5). could that somehow
be causing the problem?
x42-plugins not having parallel build enabled ...
On 06/18/2015 02:50 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
2015-06-09 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com:
2015-06-09 15:01 GMT+02:00 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org:
Note that you still need to ask for removal on mipsel of the package.
I would instead just ask for removal, and let x42
On 06/12/2015 03:27 PM, Joël Krähemann wrote:
I've already done my first package for sure it needs to improved but this
is it basically:
http://gsequencer.org/packages/ags_0.4.2-1_amd64.deb
running lintian on that packages gives 2 errors and 8 warnings, all of
which should be fixed.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
hi,
great!
welcome.
On 2015-06-11 13:14, Joël Krähemann wrote:
have created an alioth account
https://alioth.debian.org/account/register.php. -
that is very nice ;-)
would you mind sharing your user name, so we can actually add your
digital
hi, esp ross,
i was having a look at the multimedia-blends package, and would like to
change the categorization of a few package i (co)maintain.
should i just go ahead and commit them, or does this require some
discussion?
furthermore, i noticed that the various tasks mainly use the *Depends*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-06-10 13:08, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hi all,
giada is simple but powerful looper. Package is ready by my opinion
;) Is there any DD who is willing review it and if ok than upload.
would you mind to document the dfsg-repackaging in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-06-10 14:03, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
2015-06-10 13:44 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
umlae...@debian.org:
On 2015-06-10 13:08, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
giada is simple but powerful looper. Package is ready by my
opinion
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-06-09 06:35, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 00:26 +0200 schrieb Andreas
Cadhalpun:
So one can just use two directories, first run configure in both
(with the different options), then compile the
On 2015-06-02 14:26, Tino Mettler wrote:
would you like to fix them at the alioth repository?
Hi,
Done.
cool, thanks.
Now lintian --pedantic linuxptp_1.5-1_amd64.changes only shows 2
warnings that I can't do anything about
(debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature and
On 2015-05-27 12:59, Tino Mettler wrote:
I hope you are ok withe the current state of the package.
so lintian stil gives me one error and a couple of informational warnings.
the error *must* be fixed before we can upload it, the informational
tags should be fixed (and are really mostly
, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
On 2015-05-27 12:59, Tino Mettler wrote:
How will maintainership within the debian-multimedia team work?
Where will the git repository be hosted? I already have a guest
account for collab-maint on git.debian.org.
the place for our git packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-05-27 09:49, Tino Mettler wrote:
I prepared a new repository.
cool.
- as this package has never been in debian before, you can trim
the debian/changelog to a bare minimum (that is: a single section
for 1.5-1 [sic!])
Done.
but then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-05-27 12:59, Tino Mettler wrote:
How will maintainership within the debian-multimedia team work?
Where will the git repository be hosted? I already have a guest
account for collab-maint on git.debian.org.
the place for our git packages
IOhannes
On 2014-11-08 14:53, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
due to a few recent mails [1], i was wondering how much we (would
like to) enforce our 2 uploaders per package rule.
i know of at least one package i maintain under the hood of
pkg-multimedia-maintainers, which has only a single
anyone interested in becoming an uploader for that one?
packaging uses CDBS.
i expect upstream to not release very often.
fmgadsr
IOhannes
Forwarded Message
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: IOhannes m zmoelnig umlae...@debian.org
* Package name: pd-iemtab
just to let you know that i requested a package removal for 'flumotion'.
gfmsadr
IOhannes
Forwarded Message
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
flumotion uses gstreamer0.10 which is to be removed from Debian.
I contacted upstream about their plans to support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-05-18 10:04, nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote:
Joining with my fab...@debian.org account.
congratulations fabian, for becoming a DD!
fgmsdr
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-05-13 12:19, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hi all,
I am nearly ready with qtgedit packaging ... now searching for 2nd
uploader ;) Than I can upload it to our repo. Anybody interested?
so where have you put the package?
i don't see it in our
On 05/09/2015 12:21 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
But since there seems to be a clear consensus in favor of switching to
FFmpeg in Debian
where did you get that impression from?
btw, i find your email a bit too suggestive.
gmsrd
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-05-06 10:24, Aurelien Martin wrote:
I have packaged on oldstable, so I inherit of old packaging tools
I'll upgrade my main laptop during this week to jessie and
afterward to sid FYI: The package has been tested a another sid box
without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-05-05 20:48, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
W: calf source: newer-standards-version 3.9.6 (current is
3.9.4)
Which version of lintian you are running? Seems to be outdated.
nah.
lintian is recent enough, but the debian policy standards version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-05-03 18:29, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Hi Julian,
On 3 May 2015 at 09:04, Julian Wollrath jwollr...@web.de wrote:
I am terribly sorry for that big e-mail, I forgot to exclude
this patch from git-send-email.
Thanks for sharing your work.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
hi all,
i would like to package python-soundfile [1], a python audio
processing library wrapping libsndfile.
i would prefer to do this under our team umbrella, so if anybody is
interested please speak up.
fgmasfrt
IOhannes
[1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-04-13 11:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2015-04-13 09:30:54)
I think it makes a difference if we blindly trust fellow DDs or
probably random newcomers with unchecked identities.
That's a valid point.
yes.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: tags -1 confirmed pending
thanks
On 2015-03-24 13:58, Daniele Forsi wrote:
Package: pd-unauthorized Severity: minor Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
the list of objects contained in this package is reflown (as per
the policy) and it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-02-19 14:46, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I just saw that there is git-pq which seems to work similar.
I'm not sure how gitpkg does the patch thing, but do note that gbp
pq branches are not meant to be published: the export format are
the
(oops, forgot to include tino, who might not be subscribed to p-m-m;
sorry for the noise)
On 02/17/2015 07:50 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
As for DDs: ales...@debian.org or umlae...@debian.org, we have even more
in the multimedia team.
I am happy to upload, but I cannot commit to reviewing the
due to a few recent mails [1], i was wondering how much we (would like
to) enforce our 2 uploaders per package rule.
i know of at least one package i maintain under the hood of
pkg-multimedia-maintainers, which has only a single uploader (me,
obviously).
soundscaperenderer
is anybody
Control: retitle -1 bug with depth 1 OSC address
Control: tags -1 confirmed
thanks
On 11/06/2014 11:28 AM, Antoine Villeret wrote:
When parsing OSC path with more than one slash ('/'), the float is not
understood by a number box.
to be precise, [routeOSC] will output a message with the
On 10/07/2014 12:06 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2014, 11:53 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš:
even if done after so long time and mean that project has been
revived?
IMHO Yes. With packaging the new release, we -- as Debian -- have merely
done what is expected from us. By
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
hi,
thanks for the additional info.
Versions of packages gmerlin recommends: pn gmerlin-encoders
none pn gmerlin-plugins-avdecoder none pn
gmerlin-plugins-base none
does the problem go away if you install any (or all) of these
On 2014-09-15 12:28, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
hi,
thanks for the additional info.
Versions of packages gmerlin recommends: pn gmerlin-encoders
none pn gmerlin-plugins-avdecoder none pn
gmerlin-plugins-base none
does the problem go away if you install any (or all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-07-29 03:20, Marco d'Itri wrote:
if they are not drop in replacements, and it would also be a
pain if
higher up packages link-in both ffmpeg libav and some
clashing symbols are present...
This is why the new ffmpeg will use different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
personally i would welcome if both libav and ffmpeg could co-exist
within Debian¹.
as i see it, libav and ffmpeg have diverged, and as such i would like
to have the choice which one to use.
On 2014-07-28 11:55, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jul 28,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-05-26 17:46, forum::für::umläute wrote:
with that i meant a repository hosted on debian infrastructure.
most packaging repositories are hosted on alioth [1]. many alioth
packaging teams such as pkg-multimedia (and to a lesser extent
hi,
i'm seeking advice about how to deal with the following situation:
we are currently maintaining an application-package (puredata for
those interested), brought to use by upstream1.
now some people (upstream2, unrelated to upstream1) have turned the
application into a library (libpd), by
Control: tags -1 pending,fixed-in-experimental
Control: owner -1 umlae...@debian.org
thanks for the report.
while packaging frei0r-1.4 we have updated debian/copyright to DEP5 and
have now a (hopefully) accurate picture of the various licenses and
copyrights used.
frei0r_1.4-1 is now in
On 05/19/2014 07:19 PM, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
Just to bring this to your attention once more before moving on to other
places in order to find a reviewer or sponsor. It would be very nice, if
someone could have a look!
here at least a review:
your Vcs: cool that you are using git.
but your
On 05/08/2014 01:57 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2014, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
if so, i would re-upload the package with the fixed debian/copyright.
ok, so please go on.
ok, thanks; uploaded.
fgmards
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 05/02/2014 03:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please add the missing BOOST license of
ssr-0.4.1\apf\unit_tests\catch\catch.hpp
to your debian/copyright.
In addition ssr-0.4.1\data\MacOSX\dylibbundler\src\* is GPLv2+
On 03/31/2014 12:19 PM, forum::für::umläute wrote:
hi,
argh, i did it again.
sorry to not use my real name in the From: header.
but i finally found the Correct Identity plugin for icedove, which
should get my From address correctly for debian related emails.
fgmards
IOhannes
signature.asc
201 - 264 of 264 matches
Mail list logo