On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:00:53PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I do not understand this part.
>
> -maltivec should only be set for the code that is behind the runtime
> feature check, so this code is only run on hardware that has AltiVec.
Well a mistake in the configure script is making it set
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 01:33:36PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> And of course I made a typo while copying things into the patch.
>
> Doing another build test of it now.
>
> --- vlc-2.2.4.orig/configure.ac 2016-05-31 12:11:07.0 -0400
> +++ vlc-2.2.4/configure.a
And of course I made a typo while copying things into the patch.
Doing another build test of it now.
--- vlc-2.2.4.orig/configure.ac 2016-05-31 12:11:07.0 -0400
+++ vlc-2.2.4/configure.ac 2016-11-04 12:22:02.543265439 -0400
@@ -1422,25 +1422,24 @@
VLC_SAVE_FLAGS
Actually maybe this simpler version is better. I think I just figured
out why libdeinterlace wasn't getting the altivec flags, which was that
it was listed as deinterlace rather than libdeinterlace.
Doing a build test of it now.
--- vlc-2.2.4.orig/configure.ac 2016-05-31 12:11:07.0
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:42:17PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Well that looks like it only adds it for libvlccore.
So at least something like this is needed, but I think the VLCCORE is
wrong too, and maybe the deinterlace has to be moved to only merge.c
rather than all of deinterl
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 07:37:33PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:08:03PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:22:19PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 04:34:01PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 12:22:19PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 04:34:01PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This doesn't looks wrong to me.
> >
> > Note that depending on the software --enable-altivec can either mean
> > - compile
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 04:34:01PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This doesn't looks wrong to me.
>
> Note that depending on the software --enable-altivec can either mean
> - compile unconditionally for AltiVec, or
> - enable AltiVec parts with autodetection to only use them when the
> hardware
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:13:00PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This actually looks like a bug in upstream configure.ac to me:
> VLC_ADD_CFLAGS([libvlccore],[${ac_cv_c_altivec}])
> ALTIVEC_CFLAGS="$ALTIVEC_FLAGS ${ac_cv_c_altivec} ${ac_cv_c_altivec_abi}"
>
Package: liblo7
Version: 0.28-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
I was helping a friend figure out why he couldn't install dssi-vst:i386 on
his amd64 Linux Mint 17 without it wanting to remove some other packages.
I pretty quickly noticed that the problem was in fact that installing
liblo7:i386
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:03:08PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Excellent! I am unfortunately fairly busy these days. I would welcome
a team upload or even an NMU to experimental with this patch.
I am just a user. One of these days I should apply to become a DD.
Unfortunately, given the
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:59:44AM +, peter green wrote:
Seems sane to me. armv7 devices without neon are relatively uncommon
so while it's important that they are supported it's IMO not vitally
important to squeeze out every last drop of performance from them.
I don't agree. At least the
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 12:02:40PM +0100, Thomas Orgis wrote:
After Tahei didn't stop at this (big thanks from here!), we got a new
snapshot,
http://mpg123.org/snapshot/mpg123-20140302115523.tar.bz2 ,
that will hopefully become mpg123 1.19.0 soon (not 1.18.x
because of feature
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 09:06:44AM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
That sounds like if the mpg123 package should use:
on armel: --with-cpu=arm_nofpu
on armhf: --with-cpu=arm_fpu
Does this make sense to everybody?
I think so. armhf's current debian rules automatically picked arm_fpu
with
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:18:50AM +0100, Thomas Orgis wrote:
Am Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:37:41 +0900
schrieb Taihei Momma t...@mac.com:
#0 0xb6fb9332 in INT123_dct64_neon () at dct64_neon.S:48
^
not a multiple of 4.
Oh, d'oh! It could be that simple.
I've just committed
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 01:59:12AM +0900, Taihei Momma wrote:
On 2014/02/26, at 1:44, Thomas Orgis wrote:
That address didn't change.
Well, the function itself is properly aligned (so my fix didn't take effect
anyway).
0xb6fb9330 +0: vpush {d8-d15}
0xb6fb9334 +4: sub
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:05:35AM +0100, Thomas Orgis wrote:
Am Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:25:12 -0500
schrieb Lennart Sorensen lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca:
Testing with the neon build I get a return code of 4, and it seems to
be failing to run. It was a pain to even get it to compile. Using
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:29:40AM +, peter green wrote:
Thomas Orgis wrote:
So, I got conversion to float implemented now and tested with the
generic_nofpu decoder on x86-64. It _should_ of course work with ARM,
too;-) If you'd like to check the current snapshot of mpg123,
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 04:42:56PM -0500, wrote:
This patched fixes building of ffmpeg 0.5.5-1 on powerpc for me.
It matches what the code is now like in newer versions of ffmpeg.
diff -urN ffmpeg-0.5.5/libavcodec/cavs.h
ffmpeg-0.5.5.powerpcfix/libavcodec/cavs.h
---
This patched fixes building of ffmpeg 0.5.5-1 on powerpc for me.
It matches what the code is now like in newer versions of ffmpeg.
diff -urN ffmpeg-0.5.5/libavcodec/cavs.h
ffmpeg-0.5.5.powerpcfix/libavcodec/cavs.h
--- ffmpeg-0.5.5/libavcodec/cavs.h 2011-11-05 07:57:22.0 -0400
+++
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 08:47:59AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I strongly disagree that this arch specific defect on ppc is in any way
a blocking bug for recompiling moc-ffmpeg-plugin against the new libav
libraries. It only affects (some?) altivec enabled machines and can be
easily
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 04:13:52PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Are there any that don't experience it?
I just tried running ffmpeg on a power6+ machine under gdb and got:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0f6ff37c in ff_fft_calc_altivec () at
/root/libav-0.7.1
22 matches
Mail list logo
