On Fri, Aug 27, 2010, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
the general idea is to start an upload with an 'dummy' debian/changelog
entry indicating the next version, and finalize it using git-dch(1) just
before the upload.
Would you mind creating it with UNRELEASED as the target dist? This
helps dch
On Mo, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:28:32 (CEST), Loïc Minier wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
the general idea is to start an upload with an 'dummy' debian/changelog
entry indicating the next version, and finalize it using git-dch(1) just
before the upload.
Would you mind
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
For the base flavor, I totally agree. For the specialized neon flavor,
I'm not sure if that's so important. But I have to admit that I'm really
not an expert for armel, so I fully trust your judgement here.
Actually my test logic was wrong; I
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:42:17 (CEST), Loïc Minier wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
For the base flavor, I totally agree. For the specialized neon flavor,
I'm not sure if that's so important. But I have to admit that I'm really
not an expert for armel, so I fully trust
reopen 594093
thanks
/tmp/ccv13sip.s:6567: Error: selected processor does not support `ubfx
ip,r2,#6,#2'
make[1]: *** [libavcodec/aacdec.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-ffmpeg_0.6-2-armel-ldBGDA/ffmpeg-0.6/debian-neon'
make: *** [build-stamp-neon] Error 2
which
clone 594093 -1
reassign -1 src:ffmpeg
found -1 4:0.6-1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 FTBFS/armel: neon flavor requires 'ubfx' instruction
reassign 594093 mplayer
fixed 594093 2:1.0~rc4~try1.dsfg1-1
thanks
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 21:49:54 (CEST), Loïc Minier wrote:
tags 594093 + patch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 594093 -1
Bug#594093: mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo x11 (-vo sdl
works)?
Bug 594093 cloned as bug 594417.
reassign -1 src:ffmpeg
Bug #594417 [mplayer] mplayer: wrong byteorder on 16-bit displays with -vo x11
(-vo
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Hm, why can't we unconditionally turn on armv7-a for the neon flavor?
I'd prefer not overriding the toolchain defaults, only overriding the
minimum set of things.
For instance, it could be selecting a special core.
--
Loïc Minier
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 23:13:27 (CEST), Loïc Minier wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Hm, why can't we unconditionally turn on armv7-a for the neon flavor?
I'd prefer not overriding the toolchain defaults, only overriding the
minimum set of things.
For instance, it
