Bug#662774: liblivemedia-dev: Why no shared lib?

2012-03-08 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2012, 09:09 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: Am 07.03.2012 00:15, schrieb Christophe Mutricy: And take care of proper SONAME, ABI/API changes management Sure. Are we going to change this or isn't it worth the effort? I think it worth the effort. We probably want

Bug#662774: liblivemedia-dev: Why no shared lib?

2012-03-07 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 07.03.2012 00:15, schrieb Christophe Mutricy: And take care of proper SONAME, ABI/API changes management Sure. Are we going to change this or isn't it worth the effort? - Fabian ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Bug#662774: liblivemedia-dev: Why no shared lib?

2012-03-06 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Package: liblivemedia-dev Severity: wishlist Hi team, is there a serious reason why we do not provide liblivemedia as shared libs? - Fabian -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (901, 'testing'), (501, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')

Bug#662774: liblivemedia-dev: Why no shared lib?

2012-03-06 Thread Christophe Mutricy
Not that I am aware of. It's probably not provided, because upstream's build system does not support it. Excatly. Upstream uses custom Makefile. You could edit the Makefile.tail files and add support to build a shared library. And take care of proper SONAME, ABI/API changes management --