tags 683247 -moreinfo
retitle 683247 unblock libav_6:0.8.3-6
stop
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On 30.07.2012 08:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I intend to work on a new upload that incorporates your suggestions
for clarifying the
On 2012-08-01 10:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Depends: vlc libav (not considered)
The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick
look at the diff I'm not
Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Depends: vlc libav (not considered)
The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick
look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some
On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Depends: vlc libav (not considered)
The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a
quick
look at the diff I'm not
01.08.2012 в 09:45:12 +0100 Adam D. Barratt написал:
On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this
separately?
The libav discussion moved to (the cloned) #683247, where Reinhard
said he was going to upload -6. That bug also
Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
- the changelog also doesn't mention the dropping of the ffmpeg
Provides.
This was also my change, I am sorry this slipped through without
proper documentation. However, this field was so utterly wrong in that
libav-tools simply does not provide
Dear Adam,
Am 29.07.2012 23:16, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
I did not apply this change but recognize it from Emdebian sprint:
Reason is, I believe, to ease bootstrapping new architectures by
suppressing build of arch-all packages.
Jonas is right. The main reason for this change was to make it
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 22:32 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 12-07-28 at 04:47pm, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- this change looks slightly odd:
* Do not run doxygen if it is not installed.
doxygen is in B-D-Indep and only appears to be used when building the
arch:all -doc package.
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Depends: vlc libav (not considered)
The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick
look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some
discussion (there are changes which don't appear to
On 12-07-28 at 04:47pm, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- this change looks slightly odd:
* Do not run doxygen if it is not installed.
doxygen is in B-D-Indep and only appears to be used when building the
arch:all -doc package. On that basis, why would it not always be
installed when
10 matches
Mail list logo
