Bug#799649: stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-21 Thread Simon McVittie
Source: stk Version: 4.4.4-5 Severity: serious Justification: ABI break since stable when rebuilt Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background[1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break

Re: Bug#799649: stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-21 Thread Debian/GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-21 14:54, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Please go ahead. I do not know when I will have time to look at > this, so do not wait on me. > afaict, sramacher has expressed his intention to take care of stk "tonight" (sent ~5 mins after simons

Processed: Re: Bug#799649: stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #799649 [src:stk] stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 799649: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799649 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl

Bug#799649: stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-21 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 + pending Hi On 2015-09-21 09:54:28, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 21 September 2015 at 05:21, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Source: stk > > Version: 4.4.4-5 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: ABI break since stable when rebuilt > > Tags: sid stretch > > User:

Bug#799649: stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-21 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hi, On 21 September 2015 at 05:21, Simon McVittie wrote: > Source: stk > Version: 4.4.4-5 > Severity: serious > Justification: ABI break since stable when rebuilt > Tags: sid stretch > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 > > Background[1]: libstdc++6

Bug#799649: stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-21 Thread Debian/GNU
On 2015-09-21 14:54, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Please go ahead. I do not know when I will have time to look at this, > so do not wait on me. afaik, sramacher has expressed his intention to take care of stk "tonight" (sent ~5 mins after simons mail) to take care of STK. so you might want to wait