On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:18:43 +0200 Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
2013/8/21 Felyza Wishbringer fel...@gmail.com
[...]
Obviously that ND (rather than SA) excludes it from Deb, directly.
If upstream decides to go with CC-BY-SA v3, then that is compatible. ND is
explicitly not. Hope that helps.
Hi,
upstream thinking to release under CC-BY-ND
He would like to have control over derived work.
Is CC-BY-ND license debian friendly?
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/
thanks
mira
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:44:50AM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
upstream thinking to release under CC-BY-ND
He would like to have control over derived work.
Is CC-BY-ND license debian friendly?
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/
https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses
Hi,
upstream thinking to release under CC-BY-ND
He would like to have control over derived work.
Is CC-BY-ND license debian friendly? I mean is fine for debian main?
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/
Pls CC me as I am not subscribed to ML.
best regards
mira
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
upstream thinking to release under CC-BY-ND
He would like to have control over derived work.
Is CC-BY-ND license debian friendly? I mean is fine for debian main?
Thank you for looking to make software
2013/8/21 Felyza Wishbringer fel...@gmail.com
CC-BY-ND
Let's take a short look at this.
CC, cool, Creative Commons
BY, You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or
licensor, which is fine in v3, and by proxy, 2.0 and 2.5 due to the 4b
clause
that allows
