-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-09-21 10:54, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> On 2015-09-20 11:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a
crasher bug (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i
think that
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:59:17AM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a
> crasher bug (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i
> think that should be raised to "important").
> >>>
> >>> I would remove
On 2015-09-20 11:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>>> i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug
>>> (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that should be
>>> raised to "important").
>>
>> I would remove it.
i'd like to hear adrian on this first.
>
> What
2015-09-16 12:38 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš :
> 2015-09-16 11:32 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
> :
>> On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>>>
>>> So here's the suggestion. Instead of
>>>
>>>ardour -> a2
>>>ardour3 -> a3
>>>
On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>
> So here's the suggestion. Instead of
>
>ardour -> a2
>ardour3 -> a3
>ardour4 -> a4
>
> I propose
>
>ardour -> a4
>ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie)
>drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) )
>
now
2015-09-16 11:32 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)
:
> On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>>
>> So here's the suggestion. Instead of
>>
>>ardour -> a2
>>ardour3 -> a3
>>ardour4 -> a4
>>
>> I propose
>>
>>ardour -> a4
>>ardour3 -> a3 (legacy
2015-05-04 23:56 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de:
On 4 May 2015 17:04:28 GMT-04:00, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Hi!
are you still working on different method of repacking?
If you are fine with current repacking I would go forward and upload.
Quoting Jaromír Mikeš (2015-05-05 09:43:59)
W: ardour3: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
W: ardour3: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
Jonas are these warning connected to this cdbs bug?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=204975
I don't know. Maybe.
- Jonas
--
*
On 4 May 2015 17:04:28 GMT-04:00, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Hi!
are you still working on different method of repacking?
If you are fine with current repacking I would go forward and upload.
Let me know pls.
Not working on it for the foreseeable future. Whatever
2015-04-23 15:07 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com:
2015-04-23 10:47 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de:
http://git.ardour.org/ardour/ardour.git master
For get-orig-source method (I want to use for repacking) is needed
working watch file first.
Is there
2015-04-23 10:47 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de:
http://git.ardour.org/ardour/ardour.git master
For get-orig-source method (I want to use for repacking) is needed
working watch file first.
Is there any web interface to upstream git to we can monitor it with
uscan?
http://git.ardour.org/ardour/ardour.git master
For get-orig-source method (I want to use for repacking) is needed
working watch file first.
Is there any web interface to upstream git to we can monitor it with
uscan?
Yes, use https://github.com/Ardour/ardour
Thanks for taking care of
I can have a look on on repacking ... can you send me a link for
upstream git?
We should also add debian/watch file
git://git.ardour.org/ardour/ardour.git master
Thanks for taking a look!
Copyright file finished
Awesome. Feel free to upload anytime you think it's ready.
Cheers
2015-04-21 0:11 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@gmail.com:
2015-04-20 15:49 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de:
On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
How do you do repacking? Manually?
Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the
filter
2015-04-22 16:37 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de:
I can have a look on on repacking ... can you send me a link for
upstream git?
We should also add debian/watch file
git://git.ardour.org/ardour/ardour.git master
For get-orig-source method (I want to use for
On 04/21/15 06:53, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hi Adrian,
I gave a little test to Ardour4 ... looks really great.
Just one issue I can't create session connected via ALSA with JACK it
works as expected.
Does it work for you?
Yes, works for me, even inside VMs and chroots.
Cheers
2015-04-20 16:07 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com:
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 15:49 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
No, I think lintian is wrong here. I have a HiDPI display (2560x1600 on
13 screen), and small icons are a pain. OSX (the only OS that has
properly working HiDPI
2015-04-20 15:49 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de:
On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Great!
How do you do repacking? Manually?
Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the
filter statement in gbp.conf would work, but for some reason it
2015-04-19 14:13 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de:
Just wanted to let you know that I'm mostly done with packaging
ardour4.0 (released yesterday).
Hi Adrian,
I gave a little test to Ardour4 ... looks really great.
Just one issue I can't create session connected via ALSA
On 04/20/15 13:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
$ git checkout alioth/upstream-a4
$ git checkout -b upstream-a4
At least my version of git doesn't require the first line.
Now I am building new ardour ... just noticed this in build output
* Use External Libraries:
2015-04-20 14:36 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de:
On 04/20/15 13:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
$ git checkout alioth/upstream-a4
$ git checkout -b upstream-a4
At least my version of git doesn't require the first line.
Now I am building new ardour ... just noticed this in
2015-04-19 22:28 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de:
On 04/19/15 19:31, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
I'm currently building in pbuilder and will report back later.
Amazing! I am excited to give it a try. ;)
Pushed to ardour3.git now, just checkout the master-a4 and upstream-a4
On 2015-04-20 12:13, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
2015-04-20 10:30 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com:
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš:
What is wrong ? :(
I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and
--git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to
Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 11:30:50)
On 04/19/15 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote:
Last not least, we should probably cut down on the number of ardour
versions in Debian. Nobody supports a2 anymore, same for a3. It's a
Would it make sense to exclude a2 from Jessie? Removal request?
I
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:13:17PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš:
What is wrong ? :(
I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and
--git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to gbp buildpackage to point it to
the
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 11:23 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
I've done that already, so it must be something else:
You will have to be on the master-a4 branch already for this to take
effect, which Jaromir probably wasn't.
- Fabian
___
2015-04-20 10:30 GMT+02:00 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com:
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš:
What is wrong ? :(
I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and
--git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to gbp buildpackage to point it to
the right
2015-04-20 12:31 GMT+02:00 Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:13:17PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš:
What is wrong ? :(
I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 10:27 +0200 schrieb Jaromír Mikeš:
What is wrong ? :(
I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and
--git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to gbp buildpackage to point it to
the right branches.
- Fabian
___
On 04/20/15 10:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
What is wrong ? :(
I think you will have to pass --git-debian-branch=master-a4 and
--git-upstream-branch=upstream-a4 to gbp buildpackage to point it to
the right branches.
Right.
The proper thing to do is for the person choosing to use non-default
On 20 April 2015 at 10:49, Adrian Knoth a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de wrote:
On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Great!
How do you do repacking? Manually?
Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the
filter statement in gbp.conf would work, but for some reason
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 15:49 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
These should indeed be dropped. If you can figure out some magic to do
this automatically, that would be great. There's automatic
git-upstream-repackaging in CDBS, I've used it for jackd2, so taking a
look at jackd2's debian/rules
Am Montag, den 20.04.2015, 14:36 +0200 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
On 04/20/15 13:05, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
$ git checkout alioth/upstream-a4
$ git checkout -b upstream-a4
$ git fetch origin upstream-a4:upstream-a4 master-a4:master-a4
should do about the same.
- Fabian
On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Great!
How do you do repacking? Manually?
Sort of. I track upstream git and then drop the waf binary. I wish the
filter statement in gbp.conf would work, but for some reason it doesn't.
P: ardour3 source: source-contains-autogenerated-visual-c++-file
Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 15:49:41)
On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
E: ardour3: menu-icon-too-big usr/share/pixmaps/ardour4.xpm: 48x48 32x32
Should we ship smaller icon?
No, I think lintian is wrong here. I have a HiDPI display (2560x1600
on 13 screen), and small icons are a
On 20 April 2015 at 11:57, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 15:49:41)
On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
E: ardour3: menu-icon-too-big usr/share/pixmaps/ardour4.xpm: 48x48 32x32
Should we ship smaller icon?
No, I think lintian is wrong here. I have
Quoting Felipe Sateler (2015-04-20 17:06:25)
On 20 April 2015 at 11:57, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
Quoting Adrian Knoth (2015-04-20 15:49:41)
On 04/20/15 15:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
E: ardour3: menu-icon-too-big usr/share/pixmaps/ardour4.xpm: 48x48 32x32
Should we ship smaller
Hi Adrian
On 2015-04-19 14:13:02, Adrian Knoth wrote:
Just wanted to let you know that I'm mostly done with packaging
ardour4.0 (released yesterday).
I'm currently building in pbuilder and will report back later.
Note that the package is still called ardour3 with a version set to
On 04/19/15 14:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Hi Adrian
Hi!
I propose
ardour - a4
ardour3 - a3 (legacy tree for jessie)
drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) )
Is there a reason to keep old ardour versions around?
I've asked upstream about this. A4 can open
39 matches
Mail list logo