Re: RFS: Jconvolver was:[Bug#559516: FTBFS on various archs]

2009-12-07 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Mira, |--== On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 20:31:04 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz said: Od: Free Ekanayaka fr...@debian.org JM I suggesting upload zita-convolver 2.0.0-2 (with Fons's JM suggestions) than I finish Jconvolver 0.8.4 and make some tests JM with these flags. In the

Re: RFS: Jconvolver was:[Bug#559516: FTBFS on various archs]

2009-12-07 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi Mira, |--== On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:58:22 +0100 (CET), Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz said: JM Od: Free Ekanayaka fr...@debian.org JM Just one other concern ... Should be jconv renamed to jconvolver to not be JM confusing? JM If so how to do it? FE Unless there's a very

Re: RFS: Jconvolver was:[Bug#559516: FTBFS on various archs]

2009-12-06 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Od: Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz JM I suggesting upload zita-convolver 2.0.0-2 (with Fons's JM suggestions) than I finish Jconvolver 0.8.4 and make some tests JM with these flags. In the case there will be some performance JM improvements we can release zita-convolver 2.0.0-3 than with JM