Re: Bug#781938: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-11-29 Thread Vincent Pinon
Hello, One month later, I still haven't forgotten that task, sorry for the delay ;) new upload here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vid.stab Le mardi 27 octobre 2015, 00:16:57 Andreas Cadhalpun a écrit : [snip] > * d/control: > - 'Priority: optional' not extra > - packages should be

Re: Bug#781938: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-11-29 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 29 November 2015 at 18:17, Vincent Pinon wrote: > Hello, > > One month later, I still haven't forgotten that task, sorry for the delay ;) > new upload here: > http://mentors.debian.net/package/vid.stab > > Le mardi 27 octobre 2015, 00:16:57 Andreas Cadhalpun a écrit : >

Re: Bug#781938: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-10-26 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
On 26.10.2015 23:00, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 26 October 2015 at 18:34, Andreas Cadhalpun > wrote: >> On 26.10.2015 13:15, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> I see that Andreas Cadhalpun (in CC) expressed interest in this >>> package and apparently already forwarded

Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-10-26 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi. On Oct 26 2015, Felipe Sateler wrote: > I'm adding the ITP (and all participants) back to CC to let them know > about your work. Please, go ahead. I'm way too busy right now to maintain this package at this moment. Thanks, -- Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key

Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-10-26 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 26 October 2015 at 02:00, Vincent Pinon wrote: >> - You might want to keep the epoch so that people installing those >> packages can upgrade to this version when it lands in debian. > I also think that we should start with a clear base in Debian, > so I reset the changelog

Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-10-25 Thread Vincent Pinon
> - You might want to keep the epoch so that people installing those > packages can upgrade to this version when it lands in debian. I also think that we should start with a clear base in Debian, so I reset the changelog (wiping the dmo & ubuntu-ppa mix, but keeping copyright)... > - Please use

Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-10-25 Thread Vincent Pinon
Le dimanche 25 octobre 2015 16:54:59, Felipe Sateler a écrit : > On 25 October 2015 at 16:14, Vincent Pinon wrote: > > Sorry for the late answer, I was on holiday trip with family... > > I just re-uploaded both vid.stab_0.98b-1_amd64.changes and added > >

Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-10-25 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 25 October 2015 at 17:21, Vincent Pinon wrote: > Le dimanche 25 octobre 2015 16:54:59, Felipe Sateler a écrit : >> On 25 October 2015 at 16:14, Vincent Pinon wrote: >> > Sorry for the late answer, I was on holiday trip with family... >> > I just re-uploaded

Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-10-25 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Felipe Sateler (2015-10-25 22:10:15) > - You might want to keep the epoch so that people installing those > packages can upgrade to this version when it lands in debian. If I understand you correctly to recommend adding an epoch to a package to ease transistions of *non-Debian* prior

Re: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-10-12 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hi Vincent, On 12 October 2015 at 01:08, Vincent Pinon wrote: > Hello, > > I posted my introduction message to the wrong list, just understanding 1 > month after... > Here it comes again ;-) Do you have a link to the source package? -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler

Fwd: RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1

2015-10-11 Thread Vincent Pinon
Hello, I posted my introduction message to the wrong list, just understanding 1 month after... Here it comes again ;-) Vincent -- Message transmis -- Objet : RFS: vid.stab/0.98b-1 Date : vendredi 11 septembre 2015, 22:26:35 De : Vincent Pinon <vpi...@april.org> À :