https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FFmpeg/Statement
I'd like to send this to devel-announce by Tuesday, any objections?
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004
On 05.07.2015 11:04, Alessio Treglia wrote:
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FFmpeg/Statement
I'd like to send this to devel-announce by Tuesday, any objections?
Fine for me.
Best regards,
Andreas
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing
Shall we draft a brief public statement?
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FFmpeg/Statement
Cheers.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer | ales...@debian.org
Ubuntu Core Developer| quadris...@ubuntu.com
0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB
Hi Alessio,
On 01.07.2015 20:05, Alessio Treglia wrote:
Shall we draft a brief public statement?
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FFmpeg/Statement
What do you think about the following?
---
After a careful review of all the pros and cons we have finally decided to
switch from
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
What do you think about the following?
Fine to me, please do edit the wiki page! We'll let others review it then.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer |
On 01.07.2015 20:54, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
What do you think about the following?
Fine to me, please do edit the wiki page! We'll let others review it then.
OK, done.
Best regards,
Andreas
Hi!
On 2015-06-29 at 13:16 (CEST), Alessio Treglia wrote:
[...]
It must also be noted that Matteo F. Vescovi (namely the blender
most's active human maintainer) said that he would second a switch to
FFmpeg too [1] - that was at least my interpretation, Matteo please
correct me, if I am
Hi again,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
Two votes for Libav:
Jonas [8] and Alessio [9].
I've forgotten to clarify that FWIW, despite of my vote in favor of
libav, I am not in a strong opposition against the switch over.
Cheers.
--
Alessio
Hi Alessio,
On 29.06.2015 13:16, Alessio Treglia wrote:
I think it's time to wrap all this up and share our opinion with the
rest of the Debian project.
Fine for me.
[...]
I understand that FFmpeg's current uploaders would also continue to
maintain FFmpeg under the Multimedia team's
Hi,
On 28.06.2015 06:24, Bálint Réczey wrote:
I have prepared the upload for gpac in git which fixes the FTBFS for
both Libav and FFmpeg. Alessio or I will upload it.
Thanks.
The other reverse deps are there for refence only. They are broken for
reasons not related to this transition which
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, 7:15 PM Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 18.06.2015 18:57, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-09 21:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
I have now implemented this and it works fine.
It's in the extra branch of the
Hi Reinhard,
On 28.06.2015 21:56, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
It seems that you have now reimplemented the flavors logic in the ffmpeg
package.
Yes.
Nice.
Well, I'd call it a necessary evil, needed until runtime cpu detection works for
altivec and FFmpeg has a native nb/wb AMR encoder.
The
Hi,
2015-06-23 13:59 GMT-07:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Hi Matteo,
On 23.06.2015 21:51, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
On 2015-06-23 at 17:56 (CEST), Bálint Réczey wrote:
[...]
Is there anything left to be fixed before we can start the transition?
Yes, the total
Hi,
On 23.06.2015 18:07, Alessio Treglia wrote:
We are then migrating away from libav,
I've created an experimental ffmpeg branch [1] with the changes
for the transition.
Comments/testing/review are welcome. ;)
Best regards,
Andreas
1:
Hi All,
2015-06-21 12:24 GMT-07:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Hi Reinhard,
On 19.06.2015 23:50, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Jun 18, 2015 7:15 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
The altivec optimizations on powerpc are still disabled, but I
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Andreas changed packaging to ship the altivec flavor, too, until
runtime CPU detection is fixed.
Is there anything left to be fixed before we can start the transition?
Please give people few more days to speak up, I'd
Hi!
On 2015-06-23 at 18:07 (CEST), Alessio Treglia wrote:
[...]
Team,
We are then migrating away from libav, if you don't think this is the
right thing to do or intend to propose alternatives, just speak up
right now.
Blender (my main package involved in libav/ffmpeg fight) has been
Hi!
On 2015-06-23 at 17:56 (CEST), Bálint Réczey wrote:
[...]
Is there anything left to be fixed before we can start the transition?
Yes, the total disappearance of FTBFS in [1].
If I was a Release Team member, I wouldn't allow anything to happen
before all that mess is fixed.
Feel free to
Hi Matteo,
On 23.06.2015 21:51, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
On 2015-06-23 at 17:56 (CEST), Bálint Réczey wrote:
[...]
Is there anything left to be fixed before we can start the transition?
Yes, the total disappearance of FTBFS in [1].
Most of those FTBFS are completely unrelated to this
Hi Reinhard,
On 19.06.2015 23:50, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Jun 18, 2015 7:15 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
The altivec optimizations on powerpc are still disabled, but I don't think
this should delay the transition. I intend to fix this one way or another
Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (2015-06-21 14:24:43)
On 19.06.2015 23:50, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Jun 18, 2015 7:15 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
And currently FFmpeg 2.7 failed to build on ppc64 (due to changes in
configure, fixed upstream) and sparc
On 21.06.2015 22:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (2015-06-21 14:24:43)
Well, I have no intention of maintaining a pre-dh7-style debian/rules
file. That pretty much settles the question for me.
Then use a post-dh-style debian/rules file instead, as done with libav.
On Jun 18, 2015 7:15 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 18.06.2015 18:57, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-09 21:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
I have now implemented this and it works fine.
It's in the extra branch of the
Hi All,
2015-06-09 21:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Hi IOhannes,
On 09.06.2015 09:03, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
On 2015-06-09 06:35, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 00:26 +0200 schrieb Andreas
Cadhalpun:
So one can just
Hi,
On 18.06.2015 18:57, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-09 21:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
I have now implemented this and it works fine.
It's in the extra branch of the ffmpeg git repository [1].
I have tested the branch and it works nicely for me.
Thanks
Am Mittwoch, den 10.06.2015, 18:02 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
So I guess I'll wait until someone specifically asks for it.
That's a good idea. In the libavcodec case the missing -extra package
would be considered a regression, but in the libavformat case noone
asked for smb support before.
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 21:53 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
Or does someone also want a libavformat-extra flavor for the samba support?
While you are at it... ;)
No, seriously, I have no idea how usefull this is or if there is a
demand for it.
- Fabian
signature.asc
Description:
On 10.06.2015 10:17, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 21:53 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
Or does someone also want a libavformat-extra flavor for the samba support?
While you are at it... ;)
It would be easy to add, ...
No, seriously, I have no idea how usefull this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2015-06-09 06:35, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 00:26 +0200 schrieb Andreas
Cadhalpun:
So one can just use two directories, first run configure in both
(with the different options), then compile the
Hi IOhannes,
On 09.06.2015 09:03, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
On 2015-06-09 06:35, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 00:26 +0200 schrieb Andreas
Cadhalpun:
So one can just use two directories, first run configure in both
(with the different options), then
Hi Fabian,
On 08.06.2015 11:18, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 07.06.2015, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
It seems it doesn't really work, because calling configure again
causes make to rebuild everything.
Actually only if one changes the configure arguments things get
Hi Reinhard,
On 07.06.2015 22:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com mailto:andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com
wrote:
The problem I see is run-time linking a GPLv2-only program with a GPLv3+
library. I think this makes
Hi Andreas,
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 00:26 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
So one can just use two directories, first run configure in both (with
the different options), then compile the GPLv2 variant, copy the
object files (without allcodecs.o) to the GPLv3 folder, build the
remaining
Am Sonntag, den 07.06.2015, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
It seems it doesn't really work, because calling configure again
causes make to rebuild everything.
That's somehow stupid, isn't it?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Bálint,
On 07.06.2015 19:17, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-07 15:24 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Hi Fabian,
On 07.06.2015 14:39, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Samstag, den 06.06.2015, 21:29 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
Maybe we could even find a
Hi Andreas,
2015-06-06 21:29 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Hi Bálint,
On 06.06.2015 21:00, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-06 20:10 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
That's not how I interpret DFSG §1 [1]:
1. Free Redistribution
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Reinhard,
On 06.06.2015 20:30, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
The problem is that Debian users must be allowed to redistribute it,
Hi Andreas,
2015-06-07 15:24 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Hi Fabian,
On 07.06.2015 14:39, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Samstag, den 06.06.2015, 21:29 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
Maybe we could even find a reasonable way to implement this in a dh7-style
Hi Andreas,
Am Samstag, den 06.06.2015, 21:29 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
Maybe we could even find a reasonable way to implement this in a dh7-style
debian/rules file without doubling the build-time.
yes, most probably. I do strongly believe that it is not necessary to
clean the source
Hi Bálint,
On 07.06.2015 15:36, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-06 21:29 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Maybe, but I don't really look forward to more legal discussions.
(One reason to avoid the libavcodec-extra flavor.)
Would you be willing to ask debian-legal
Hi Reinhard,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2015, 20:32 -0400 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I think the statistics indicate that the situation is much worse than
I expected. Please keep in mind that because of the daily merges, all
commits that are made in Libav also appear in FFmpeg, but not the
other
Hi Fabian,
On 07.06.2015 14:39, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am Samstag, den 06.06.2015, 21:29 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
Maybe we could even find a reasonable way to implement this in a dh7-style
debian/rules file without doubling the build-time.
yes, most probably. I do strongly believe
Hi,
On 06.06.2015 02:01, Bálint Réczey wrote:
GPL imposes no restrictions on _using_ software, but on distributing
it without properly licensed source, i.e. distributing a binary
compiled from GPLv3 source without also providing the source under
GPLv3 is prohibited.
Compiling hedgewars
Hi Reinhard,
On 06.06.2015 02:07, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
As you can see from above numbers, even in the uttermost worst case,
that is if both Michael and the Libav developers stopped working on
the codebase, FFmpeg would still have more commits than Libav
currently does.
Comparing an
Hi Andreas,
2015-06-06 19:15 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Hi,
On 06.06.2015 02:01, Bálint Réczey wrote:
GPL imposes no restrictions on _using_ software, but on distributing
it without properly licensed source, i.e. distributing a binary
compiled from GPLv3
Hi Bálint,
On 06.06.2015 19:51, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-06 19:15 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
On 06.06.2015 02:01, Bálint Réczey wrote:
The problem is that Debian users must be allowed to redistribute it,
but as far as I understand it, it is not allowed
Hi Andreas,
2015-06-06 20:10 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Hi Bálint,
On 06.06.2015 19:51, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-06 19:15 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
On 06.06.2015 02:01, Bálint Réczey wrote:
The problem is that
Hi Reinhard,
On 06.06.2015 20:30, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
The problem is that Debian users must be allowed to redistribute it,
but as far as I understand it, it is not allowed to distribute e.g.
a live DVD with
Hi Reinhard,
2015-06-06 20:30 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
...
I'm OK with disabling AMR encoder in ffmpeg and stay GPLv2 compatible
with the packages since I have no packages requiring it nor
Hi Andreas,
2015-06-06 21:05 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
The current libav packaging already implements
this in a way that the user can choose what packages to install.
On a personal note: The libav packaging can surely be improved and
simplified. But
Hi Bálint,
On 06.06.2015 21:00, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-06 20:10 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
That's not how I interpret DFSG §1 [1]:
1. Free Redistribution
The license of a Debian component may not restrict any party from selling
or giving away the
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
The problem is that Debian users must be allowed to redistribute it,
but as far as I understand it, it is not allowed to distribute e.g.
a live DVD with hedgewars and libavcodec-extra installed.
I also pointed this out
Hi,
On 01.06.2015 17:06, Felipe Sateler wrote:
You can check what /git/pkg-multimedia/setup-repository does.
I would suggest to create the repository using that script, and then do:
cd ffmpeg.git ; git fetch /git/collab-maint/ffmpeg.git
I had to specify all branches explicitly
Hi Bálint,
On 05.06.2015 17:25, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-05 0:28 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
...
That's not only because of optimization, but also for licensing
issues: The lib*-extra-* packages are licensed with GPLv3+, which is
not acceptable for the
[short answer, I'm on the run]
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I had considered producing optimized flavors, but I came to the conclusion
that it would complicate debian/rules without much benefit, because
the flavors are mostly
Hi Andreas,
2015-06-05 17:53 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Hi Bálint,
On 05.06.2015 17:25, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-05 0:28 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
...
That's not only because of optimization, but also for licensing
Hi Reinhard,
On 04.06.2015 02:32, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
and would rather propose to just rename the current libav source
package to ffmpeg and package the latest ffmpeg source tarball.
Then that
Hi Stuart,
On 03.06.2015 11:14, Stuart Prescott wrote:
1: https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/libav-provider/ffmpeg
thanks for this -- it's good to see a summary of where we are.
It would be good if you also include information on:
Thanks for the feedback.
* the API stability promise of
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
and would rather propose to just rename the current libav source
package to ffmpeg and package the latest ffmpeg source tarball.
Then that ffmpeg source package would take over the binary package
names
Hi Andreas,
1: https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/libav-provider/ffmpeg
thanks for this -- it's good to see a summary of where we are.
It would be good if you also include information on:
* the API stability promise of upstream (do we need a library transition
each time a minor update is
Hi Alessio,
On 01.06.2015 18:14, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I hope creating these wiki pages won't delay the switch.
And it'll save me from having to explain my point of view another time,
because I can
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
No, neither the new input in the past couple weeks nor repition of old
input have made me change opinion on the matter.
Not mine, either.
However,
It seems pretty clear to me that the majority of those people who
kindly
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
What about the git hooks sending the commit mails to the list?
I can't imaging it'll just work, or will it?
Ah, nice catch. I haven't played too much with the hooks, that's why
I'd feel more comfortable
Hi Felipe,
On 01.06.2015 17:06, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 1 June 2015 at 12:00, Andreas Cadhalpun
What about the git hooks sending the commit mails to the list?
I can't imaging it'll just work, or will it?
You can check what /git/pkg-multimedia/setup-repository does.
Ah, thanks for the
Hi Bálint,
On 01.06.2015 17:57, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-01 17:45 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
I think having the arguments on the wiki isn't such a bad idea,
because reading a long mailing list thread (where the arguments tend
to go around in circles)
Hi Bálint,
On 01.06.2015 17:37, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-01 15:33 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org:
On 2015-05-30 17:54:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
- Sebastian, you made the most recent uploads of the Libav package
where I handed off upstream releases to you, but I don't
Hi Andreas,
2015-06-01 17:45 GMT+02:00 Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com:
Hi Bálint,
On 01.06.2015 17:37, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-01 15:33 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org:
On 2015-05-30 17:54:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
- Sebastian, you made the most
On 2015-06-01 17:29:13, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Hi Andreas
On 2015-06-01 16:59:13, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 01.06.2015 15:33, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2015-05-30 17:54:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
- Sebastian, you made the most recent uploads of the Libav package
where I
2015-06-01 17:37 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi Sebastian,
2015-06-01 15:33 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org:
On 2015-05-30 17:54:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
- Sebastian, you made the most recent uploads of the Libav package
where I handed off upstream
Hi Sebastian,
On 01.06.2015 17:29, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2015-06-01 16:59:13, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
If you tell me where and how, I can put my arguments on a wiki page.
I've created [1]. [2] and [3] can be used to list arguments for libav
respectively ffmpeg.
[1]
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
I hope creating these wiki pages won't delay the switch.
And it'll save me from having to explain my point of view another time,
because I can just point to the wiki.
We should have created such pages
Hi Bálint
On 2015-06-01 17:37:36, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2015-06-01 15:33 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Ramacher sramac...@debian.org:
On 2015-05-30 17:54:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
- Sebastian, you made the most recent uploads of the Libav package
where I handed off upstream releases to you, but I
Hi Andreas
On 2015-06-01 16:59:13, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 01.06.2015 15:33, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2015-05-30 17:54:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
- Sebastian, you made the most recent uploads of the Libav package
where I handed off upstream releases to you, but I don't recall you
On 1 June 2015 at 12:00, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Alessio (and all others who were quick to reply :),
On 01.06.2015 16:58, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:54 PM, umläute zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at wrote:
On 2015-06-01 16:49, Andreas Cadhalpun
On 2015-05-31 13:21:07, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
I'd rather keep the packaging of the package that is currently called
libav, because on many architectures, it compiles multiple flavors
with hardware optimized flavors (on i386 for instance, there is a
flavor without latest SEE, etc).
I
Hi Sebastian,
On 01.06.2015 17:18, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2015-05-31 13:21:07, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
I'd rather keep the packaging of the package that is currently called
libav, because on many architectures, it compiles multiple flavors
with hardware optimized flavors (on i386 for
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:54 PM, umläute zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at wrote:
On 2015-06-01 16:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Does someone know what would be the best way to move the repository?
$ cd /git/collab-maint
$ mv ffmpeg.git /etc/pkg-multimedia
$ ln -s /etc/pkg-multimedia/ffmpeg.git .
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does someone know what would be the best way to move the repository?
Just move the directory?
Or add a new remote and push everything to it. I'd also suggest to ask
for the removal of the old one - to save
Hi Alessio (and all others who were quick to reply :),
On 01.06.2015 16:58, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 3:54 PM, umläute zmoel...@umlaeute.mur.at wrote:
On 2015-06-01 16:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Does someone know what would be the best way to move the repository?
$ cd
On 2015-05-30 17:54:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
- Sebastian, you made the most recent uploads of the Libav package
where I handed off upstream releases to you, but I don't recall you
participating in this thread. I also know that you have been
interacting with Libav upstream in the past. I'd
On 2015-06-01 16:49, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
Does someone know what would be the best way to move the repository?
$ cd /git/collab-maint
$ mv ffmpeg.git /etc/pkg-multimedia
$ ln -s /etc/pkg-multimedia/ffmpeg.git .
should I do it?
fgasdr
IOhannes
Hi Alessio,
On 01.06.2015 08:49, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
No, neither the new input in the past couple weeks nor repition of old
input have made me change opinion on the matter.
Not mine, either.
However,
It seems
Hi Sebastian,
On 01.06.2015 15:33, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2015-05-30 17:54:46, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
- Sebastian, you made the most recent uploads of the Libav package
where I handed off upstream releases to you, but I don't recall you
participating in this thread. I also know that
Am Montag, den 01.06.2015, 16:49 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
Does someone know what would be the best way to move the repository?
Don't know of this is the best way, but it's the hard way.
ssh git.debian.org
cd /srv/git.debian.org/git
mv collab-maint/ffmpeg.git pkg-multimedia
ln -s
Dear Reinhard,
Am Samstag, den 30.05.2015, 17:54 -0400 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
- Fabian, you were counted as in favor of switching to FFmpeg. In the
light of the most recent posting from Andreas, the mails that Balint
kindly forwarded, and my thoughts, would you approve and support
moving
Hi Reinhard,
On 30.05.2015 23:54, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Andeas already proposed a transition plan [1] and already submitted
several bugs.
If we decide to switch to ffmpeg, I think this is the best proposal so far.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
2015-05-30 23:54 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com:
Where is Reinhard's original mail? I can't find it.
--
Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com
Debian Developer |
2015-05-30 23:54 GMT+02:00 Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com:
...
I'd rather keep the packaging of the package that is currently called
libav, because on many architectures, it compiles multiple flavors
with hardware optimized flavors (on i386 for instance, there is a
flavor without latest
[CC'ed are the maintainers of reverse (build-)dependencies.
Please reply only to pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org.
If you're interested in this discussion, consider subscribing that list.]
Hi,
On 29.04.2015 20:56, Alessio Treglia wrote:
I am afraid that I have to revive this
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2015-05-30 23:54:46)
- Jonas Allessio, Balint counted both of you as in favor of Libav.
Did your opinion/impression change in the last couple of weeks?
No, neither the new input in the past couple weeks nor repition of old
input have made me change opinion on the
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
2015-05-29 12:22 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org:
Thanks for insight into upstream security situation, Balint.
So what would be the next step? Mass bug filings? Shall we draft a template
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org wrote:
Thanks for insight into upstream security situation, Balint.
So what would be the next step? Mass bug filings? Shall we draft a template
here?
Wait for Reinhard to come back up with news from libav side. Then, if
Thanks for insight into upstream security situation, Balint.
So what would be the next step? Mass bug filings? Shall we draft a template
here?
--
All the best,
Dmitry Smirnov
---
It is a fine thing to be honest, but it is also very important to be right.
-- Winston Churchill
Hi Dmitry,
2015-05-29 12:22 GMT+02:00 Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org:
Thanks for insight into upstream security situation, Balint.
So what would be the next step? Mass bug filings? Shall we draft a template
here?
Andeas already proposed a transition plan [1] and already submitted
several
On 05/24/2015 07:13 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi All,
I have contacted Moritz asking him to share his opinion regarding
FFmpeg/Libav. He is not on the list thus asked me to forward his
email.
Moritz also suggested asking Mateusz Jurczyk.
Please see his email:
On 05/27/2015 08:21 PM, Mateusz
Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2015, 22:01 +0200 schrieb Balint Reczey:
Moritz also suggested asking Mateusz Jurczyk.
Please see his email:
This was very insightful, thank you!
- Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi All,
I have contacted Moritz asking him to share his opinion regarding
FFmpeg/Libav. He is not on the list thus asked me to forward his
email.
Please see his answer inline.
2015-05-18 15:11 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Ghedini gh...@debian.org:
On lun, mag 18, 2015 at 01:47:25 +0100, Alessio Treglia
Quoting Dmitry Smirnov (2015-05-19 14:40:51)
On Mon, 18 May 2015 16:05:11 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
How would they not be relevant? They recommend users to use ffmpeg
and list examples of problems they may encounter if they decide to
use mpv with libav (problems that are regularly reported as
On Mon, 18 May 2015 12:16:32 Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Interestingly Gentoo recently switched to FFmpeg by default [3] after
conducting
a survey [4]. About 300 people participated in that survey and the outcome
was rather clear:
It saddens me to see people organizing votes where people
On Mon, 18 May 2015 16:05:11 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
How would they not be relevant? They recommend users to use ffmpeg and
list examples of problems they may encounter if they decide to use mpv
with libav (problems that are regularly reported as mpv bugs).
Because a) it is not a
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
