On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 07:29:51AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Can someone fluent in C/C++ please look at this? Perhaps you,
Adrian, since you seem most knowledgeable in JACK around here?
Adrian, is there a jackd ABI definition? What symbols are supposed to be
exposed by libjack? I
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 07:29:51AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Can someone fluent in C/C++ please look at this? Perhaps you, Adrian,
since you seem most knowledgeable in JACK around here?
I think I qualify.
I'm not sure if I do. ;) Never used the debian symbol files...
Another source
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:34:37PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 13:06:18 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 07:29:51AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Can someone fluent in C/C++ please look at this? Perhaps you,
Adrian, since you seem most
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 18:11:39 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:34:37PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 13:06:18 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 07:29:51AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Can someone fluent in C/C++
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:50, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 18:11:39 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:34:37PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 13:06:18 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 19:24:23 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
For C++ libraries, I don't see any point in using symbol files until
dpkg-gensyms understands unmangled symbols. Working on demangled symbol
is just too painful IMO.
According to bug #563752, dpkg-gensyms understands them.
yes,
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:24:23PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:50, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de
For jack, I think the amount of symbol files is just too much ATM.
First, I'd strongly suggest to hide the symbols.
I agree here. Symbol tracking does not make
Hi!
The opensuse jackd maintainer just informed me that he switched from
jackd1 to jackd2 on BuildService. OpenSuse 11.3 will follow soon.
Looks like we have coordinated acting of distros, here. ;)
--
mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 09:41:56PM +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
Hi!
The opensuse jackd maintainer just informed me that he switched from
jackd1 to jackd2 on BuildService. OpenSuse 11.3 will follow soon.
Looks like we have coordinated acting of distros, here. ;)
Cool!
- Jonas
--
* Jonas
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 15:17, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:24:23PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:50, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de
For jack, I think the amount of symbol files is just too much ATM. First,
I'd strongly
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 21:17:58 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I agree that the *switch* from 1.1.x to 1.9.x is noisy, I raised that as
a concern, Reinhard have checked it out and judged it as not worrying,
and I am satisfied with that.
It seems we are miscommunicating, I don't remember such
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 17:22, Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de wrote:
We only _assume_ JACK API to be stable - yet we track upstream VCS so
should not be certain IMO.
The jack API as defined by the doxygen documentation is AFAIUI fairly
stable. The exported ABI seems not.
The _intended_
I've looked a bit into the hiding thing... and jack2 seems to export 2
kinds of symbols. It exports weak symbols (the standard API), and
exports several other symbols as default visibility. I'm guessing that
the default symbols are part of the libjackserver API, but for some
reason some of them
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 05:55:52PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I've looked a bit into the hiding thing... and jack2 seems to export 2
kinds of symbols. It exports weak symbols (the standard API), and
exports several other symbols as default visibility. I'm guessing that
Have you seen this
Your message dated Fri, 9 Apr 2010 03:04:23 +0200
with message-id m2me5354091004081804jfe5575b2te2d9c150f0a3d...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Missing autoreconf to fix 554821 or similar bugs in the future
has caused the Debian Bug report #558502,
regarding Missing autoreconf to fix 554821 or
stk_4.4.2-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
stk_4.4.2-4.dsc
stk_4.4.2-4.diff.gz
libstk0-dev_4.4.2-4_amd64.deb
libstk0c2a_4.4.2-4_amd64.deb
stk_4.4.2-4_amd64.deb
stk-doc_4.4.2-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libstk0-dev_4.4.2-4_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel, override says
sound.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database,
Your message dated Fri, 09 Apr 2010 01:33:14 +
with message-id e1o035u-00053e...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#569052: fixed in stk 4.4.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #569052,
regarding (stk_4.4.2-3/avr32): FTBFS: Outdated config.{sub,guess}
to be marked as done.
This means that
São Paulo 9/4/2010
À friend
Prezado friend
Meu nome e Paulo Aleksandro sou prestador de serviços no setor de TI .
Sou prestador de Serviços á 9 anos na área de Informátiva e trabalho com as 3
principais plataformas do mercado (Windows,Linux e Mac)
e certificado em duas, windows e linux,
19 matches
Mail list logo
