Re: libav strict internal shlibs dependencies

2012-04-06 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Andres Mejia amejia...@gmail.com wrote: I see the strict internal dependencies was added long ago. [1] Is this something that is still needed? I imagine each of the libraries don't need these strict dependencies with one another anymore, and if it still does, it

Processed: bug 667309 is forwarded to https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3515396group_id=149835atid=775955 ...

2012-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 667309 https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3515396group_id=149835atid=775955 Bug #667309 [ois] ois: ftbfs with GCC-4.7 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Processing of ois_1.3.0+dfsg0-4_amd64.changes

2012-04-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ois_1.3.0+dfsg0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ois_1.3.0+dfsg0-4.dsc ois_1.3.0+dfsg0-4.debian.tar.gz libois-dev_1.3.0+dfsg0-4_amd64.deb libois-1.3.0_1.3.0+dfsg0-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

Processed: tagging 667622

2012-04-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 667622 + pending Bug #667622 [rosegarden] rosegarden desktop file needs German L10n of Comment entry Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 667622:

ois_1.3.0+dfsg0-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-04-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: libois-1.3.0_1.3.0+dfsg0-4_amd64.deb to main/o/ois/libois-1.3.0_1.3.0+dfsg0-4_amd64.deb libois-dev_1.3.0+dfsg0-4_amd64.deb to main/o/ois/libois-dev_1.3.0+dfsg0-4_amd64.deb ois_1.3.0+dfsg0-4.debian.tar.gz to main/o/ois/ois_1.3.0+dfsg0-4.debian.tar.gz ois_1.3.0+dfsg0-4.dsc to

Re: [SCM] gpac/master.experimental: Revert Add build depends on libmozjs-dev for SpiderMonkey ECMAScript support.

2012-04-06 Thread Alessio Treglia
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:52 AM, ales...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: The following commit has been merged in the master.experimental branch: commit 65f72782a6cd8b3578a8a957a1521c441f4c0519 Author: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org Date:   Fri Apr 6 10:52:02 2012 +0200    Revert Add

Processing of gpac_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1_amd64.changes

2012-04-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gpac_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gpac_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1.dsc gpac_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0.orig.tar.bz2 gpac_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1.debian.tar.gz gpac_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1_amd64.deb gpac-dbg_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1_amd64.deb

gpac_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2012-04-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
gpac-dbg_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gpac/gpac-dbg_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1_amd64.deb gpac-modules-base_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gpac/gpac-modules-base_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1_amd64.deb gpac_0.4.5+svn4002~dfsg0-1.debian.tar.gz to

Estimado suscriptor cuenta

2012-04-06 Thread WEBMAIL
Su buzón ha superado el límite de almacenamiento de 20 GB, que es según lo establecido por el administrador, que está actualmente en ejecución en 20.9GB, no podrás ser capaz de enviar o recibir correo nuevo hasta que vuelva a validar su buzón de correo. Para volver a validar su buzón de correo

laditools 1.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

2012-04-06 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the laditools source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0~rc2+20100724.gitf4d4a2-5 Current version: 1.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times

tsdecrypt_7.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-04-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: tsdecrypt_7.0-1.debian.tar.gz to main/t/tsdecrypt/tsdecrypt_7.0-1.debian.tar.gz tsdecrypt_7.0-1.dsc to main/t/tsdecrypt/tsdecrypt_7.0-1.dsc tsdecrypt_7.0-1_amd64.deb to main/t/tsdecrypt/tsdecrypt_7.0-1_amd64.deb tsdecrypt_7.0.orig.tar.bz2 to

Re: libav strict internal shlibs dependencies

2012-04-06 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Donnerstag, den 05.04.2012, 21:59 -0400 schrieb Andres Mejia: package. Any thoughts on these strict shlib dependencies removal? Please keep the strict internal dependencies for the reasons Reinhard mentioned. One should not mix libraries of e.g. version 0.x from testing with 0.x.y from

Bug#667653: mpg123 FTBFS on armhf

2012-04-06 Thread Thomas Orgis
What is this ...? As mpg123 upstream it would be cool to get note of such issues without having to look for them in the debian bts. Having some bot subscribe and post to mpg123-de...@lists.sourceforge.net would be splendit; but if that is too troublesome, sending an info to maintai...@mpg123.org

¡Hola

2012-04-06 Thread Favor M
¡Hola Espero que estés bien de salud. Mi nombre es Mitali favor. Soy una chica sola. Busco persona confiable y honesta. por favor tenga un poco de tiempo para mí. Por favor ponerse en contacto conmigo de vuelta en  para que yo pueda explicar todo sobre mí, incluyendo mis imágenes.

Bug#667653: mpg123 FTBFS on armhf

2012-04-06 Thread Miguel Colon
As mpg123 upstream it would be cool to get note of such issues without having to look for them in the debian bts. Having some bot subscribe and post to mpg123-de...@lists.sourceforge.net would be splendit; but if that is too troublesome, sending an info to maintai...@mpg123.org would be just

Bug#664998: Too much CPU used

2012-04-06 Thread Miguel Colon
I cannot reproduce that on my personal box. I have a Duron at 800 MHz with debian squeeze on it. Running mpg123 -v needs around 1% of CPU! There must be something else going on. Also please note that nowadays, the audio output happily gobbles up way more CPU than mpg123 needs. An example is the

Bug#667653: mpg123 FTBFS on armhf

2012-04-06 Thread Thomas Orgis
Am Fri, 6 Apr 2012 22:27:07 -0400 schrieb Miguel Colon debian.mic...@gmail.com: I saw that layer3.c includes #include mpg123lib_intern.h and that in that file there is a block: # elif defined(OPT_ARM) /* for arm */ # define REAL_MUL_ASM(x, y, radix) \ snip Damn, you got me there! I

Bug#666478: upcoming rsvg removal

2012-04-06 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi everyone, a few questions have come up since I filed those bugs reports and my bug description was not fully accurate, I'll try address them with this email. On 06.04.2012 23:25, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: As I wrote, rsvg and rsvg-convert are command line compatible, so you basically