Bug#681187: supercollider-emacs: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)

2012-07-11 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: supercollider-emacs Version: 1:3.5.3~repack-1 Severity: important User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):

Bug#681136: libavcodec-extra-53: Cannot install libavcodec-extra-53 without losing kde

2012-07-11 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 10.07.2012 22:47, schrieb Graham Cobb: I speculate that some kde package has a dependency on libavcodec53. Should libavcodec-extra-53 provide libavcodec53? Packages in Debian should always have alternative dependdencied on both, i.e. libavcodec53| libavcodec-extra-53. Do you have packages

Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy

2012-07-11 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Hi, We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the changes are quite large. Usually, we ask the maintainer to prepare an upload based on testing's source package and targeting testing-proposed-updates.

Re: Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy

2012-07-11 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 11.07.2012 14:20, schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the changes are quite large. Usually, we ask the maintainer to prepare an upload based on testing's source package

Re: review qemplayer

2012-07-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-10 18:06, wbrana wrote: On 7/9/12, wbrana wbr...@gmail.com wrote: I managed temporary to change limits from command line, but I/O priority can't be increased x@debian:~$ mplayer_nice cant set I/O priority MPlayer svn r34540 (Debian),

Re: Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy

2012-07-11 Thread Dan S
Hi - It's easy to fix #654506 because supercollider never used waf so the file can simply be deleted in repacking a ~dfsg version, and build will still work fine. I don't want to work on #674386 because working on the scons build is a waste of time when we've junked it long ago, and the bug is

Re: Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy

2012-07-11 Thread Dan S
2012/7/11 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com: Am 11.07.2012 14:20, schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the changes are quite large. Usually, we ask the maintainer to

Re: Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy

2012-07-11 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: Hi, We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the changes are quite large. I think you mean 1:3.5.3~repack-1? That is what's

Re: Supercollider fails to build

2012-07-11 Thread Dan S
2012/7/11 Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Dan S danstowell+de...@gmail.com wrote: A fix for issue 2 will be along in a week or two, after the developer has integrated an updated source file. Any temporary fix we can apply? The longer we take to fix this,

Re: Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy

2012-07-11 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 11/07/12 16:01, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Mehdi Dogguyme...@dogguy.org wrote: Hi, We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we are not able to accept supercollider/1:3.5.2-1 from Unstable since the changes are quite large. I think you

hiii

2012-07-11 Thread aminataawad12
___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Re: review qemplayer

2012-07-11 Thread wbrana
btw, why do you need mplayer_nice in the first place? afaiu, qemplayer is an qt frontend to mplayer, and does not need realtime I/O priorities any more than mplayer itself. mplayer_nice is key feature of qemplayer. Realtime I/O priority for MPlayer is needed when some other application is fully

Re: Fixing #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy

2012-07-11 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: On 11/07/12 16:01, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Mehdi Dogguyme...@dogguy.org wrote: Hi, We would like to fix #654506 and #674386 in Wheezy. Unfortunately, we are not able to accept

Re: review qemplayer

2012-07-11 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM, wbrana wbr...@gmail.com wrote: btw, why do you need mplayer_nice in the first place? afaiu, qemplayer is an qt frontend to mplayer, and does not need realtime I/O priorities any more than mplayer itself. mplayer_nice is key feature of qemplayer. Realtime I/O

Re: review qemplayer

2012-07-11 Thread wbrana
On 7/11/12, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM, wbrana wbr...@gmail.com wrote: mplayer_nice is key feature of qemplayer. Realtime I/O priority for MPlayer is needed when some other application is fully loading hard drive. It prevents empty buffer in

ITA: freej frei0r

2012-07-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi all, i followed some discussion on the frei0r (minimalist api for free video effects) mailinglist [1], that indicated that the current frei0r packages in debian are horribly out of date. given that the current maintainer is willing to hand over

Re: ITA: freej frei0r

2012-07-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-11 at 07:03pm, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: i followed some discussion on the frei0r (minimalist api for free video effects) mailinglist [1], that indicated that the current frei0r packages in debian are horribly out of date. given that the current maintainer is willing to hand over

Bug#681136: libavcodec-extra-53: Cannot install libavcodec-extra-53 without losing kde

2012-07-11 Thread Graham Cobb
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 10:20:37 Fabian Greffrath wrote: Packages in Debian should always have alternative dependdencied on both, i.e. libavcodec53| libavcodec-extra-53. Do you have packages from other repositories installed? The problem appears to have been that I had not succeeded in

Bug#681136: Should libavcodec-extra-53 Provides: libavcodec53? [Was: Re: Bug#681136: libavcodec-extra-53: Cannot install libavcodec-extra-53 without losing kde]

2012-07-11 Thread Fabian Greffrath
The problem appears to have been that I had not succeeded in removing all Marillat's packages, despite trying to make sure I had before reporting I suspected this. :) After reinstalling all the vlc (and xine) related packages I was able to install libavcodec-extra-53. At least. I still

Newcomer to vlc

2012-07-11 Thread Hor Jiun Shyong
Hi Guys, I am Hor Jiun Shyong here. I just joined the vlc package mailing list. I would like to offer my assistance for any help needed for the package. Many thanks. -- Regards, Hor Jiun Shyong 何俊雄 Blog: jiunshyong.dyndns.org twitter.com/jiunshyong facebook.com/jiunshyong I'm an FSF member