RE: Bug#834705: ITP: libyami-utils -- Intel VA-API Media Applications and Scripts for libyami

Hi all: I want add two multimedia packages (libyami and libyami-utils) to debian. Therefore, I wrote two ITP to debian bug system. However, they point me to this mail list. Is any guide for adding multimedia package to debian? I searched web but did find useful information there. Thanks. Hi

lv2-c++-tools is marked for autoremoval from testing

lv2-c++-tools 1.0.5-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-09-27 It is affected by these RC bugs: 834291: lv2-c++-tools: lv2-c++-tools: FTBFS: undefined reference to `boost::system::generic_category()' 834297: lv2-c++-tools: lv2-c++-tools: FTBFS with new boost

vocproc is marked for autoremoval from testing

vocproc 0.2-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-09-27 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 834291: lv2-c++-tools: lv2-c++-tools: FTBFS: undefined reference to `boost::system::generic_category()' 834297: lv2-c++-tools: lv2-c++-tools: FTBFS with new boost

Bug#834488: marked as done (ardour-data and ardour: error when trying to install together)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:20:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#834488: fixed in ardour 1:5.0~dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #834488, regarding ardour-data and ardour: error when trying to install together to be marked as done.

ardour_5.0~dfsg-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:06:52 +0200 Source: ardour Binary: ardour ardour-data ardour3 ardour-i686 ardour-altivec Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1:5.0~dfsg-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian

Processing of ardour_5.0~dfsg-2_amd64.changes

ardour_5.0~dfsg-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ardour_5.0~dfsg-2.dsc ardour_5.0~dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz ardour-altivec_5.0~dfsg-2_all.deb ardour-data_5.0~dfsg-2_all.deb ardour-dbgsym_5.0~dfsg-2_amd64.deb ardour-i686_5.0~dfsg-2_all.deb

Bug#835066: RFP: libhdcd -- HDCD (High Definition Compatible Digital) decoder

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libhdcd Version : git Upstream Author : Burt P. * URL : https://github.com/bp0/libhdcd * License : BSD Programming Lang: C Description : HDCD (High Definition Compatible Digital)

Olá, meu amado no Senhor!

Olá, meu amado no Senhor! Eu sou a Sra Marissa Hogan, eu estou muito triste em contato com você este mesmo meio, mas só porque eu não tenho nenhuma opção do que isso e não tenho mais tempo. Eu quero transferir US $ 12.5million dólares para você sobre a caridade para você para ajudar a

Proposal For You

I have a business proposal for you,contact me via my personal E-mail for more detail's: ms_teresa_...@outlook.com ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Dearest Friend (Donation)

Dearest Friend (Donation) I write to you in good faith and hoping that you will understand the importance of my email. My decision to contact you is because I have been recently diagnosed with Cancer and the doctor said I have less than 6 weeks to live. Since this sudden news was announced to

Processed: Bug#769532 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 769532 pending Bug #769532 {Done: Ondřej Nový } [vpx-tools] vpxenc manpage Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 769532:

Re: Wheezy update of vlc?

Hi, On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 10:10:20PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Also note that https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-5108 > doesn't provide and useful information about this issue. Is that issue also > known by a different identifier? MITRE has just not yet updated

Bug#834953: marked as done (ams: Should this package be removed?)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:46:27 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#834953: ams: Should this package be removed? has caused the Debian Bug report #834953, regarding ams: Should this package be removed? to

Bug#834953: ams: Should this package be removed?

Hi Reinhard, On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > The package "ams" hasn't seen an upstream release since April 2014 > (cf. http://alsamodular.sourceforge.net/). The last upload to debian > was on 2014-04-12. > > It currently has one RC bug, and if I