Re: [PATCH 1/4] Import upstream version 3.6.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-03 18:29, Felipe Sateler wrote: Hi Julian, On 3 May 2015 at 09:04, Julian Wollrath jwollr...@web.de wrote: I am terribly sorry for that big e-mail, I forgot to exclude this patch from git-send-email. Thanks for sharing your work.

Re: review/upload calf

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-06 10:24, Aurelien Martin wrote: I have packaged on oldstable, so I inherit of old packaging tools I'll upgrade my main laptop during this week to jessie and afterward to sid FYI: The package has been tested a another sid box without

Re: review/upload calf

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-05 20:48, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: W: calf source: newer-standards-version 3.9.6 (current is 3.9.4) Which version of lintian you are running? Seems to be outdated. nah. lintian is recent enough, but the debian policy standards version

Re: qxgedit 2nd uploader needed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-13 12:19, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hi all, I am nearly ready with qtgedit packaging ... now searching for 2nd uploader ;) Than I can upload it to our repo. Anybody interested? so where have you put the package? i don't see it in our

Re: Request to Join Project Debian Multimedia Maintainers from Fabian Greffrath (fabian)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-18 10:04, nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote: Joining with my fab...@debian.org account. congratulations fabian, for becoming a DD! fgmsdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

Re: Select provider of libav* libraries

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-06-09 06:35, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Hi Andreas, Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2015, 00:26 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun: So one can just use two directories, first run configure in both (with the different options), then compile the

Re: giada - looper ready for upload

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-06-10 13:08, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Hi all, giada is simple but powerful looper. Package is ready by my opinion ;) Is there any DD who is willing review it and if ok than upload. would you mind to document the dfsg-repackaging in

Re: giada - looper ready for upload

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-06-10 14:03, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: 2015-06-10 13:44 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) umlae...@debian.org: On 2015-06-10 13:08, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: giada is simple but powerful looper. Package is ready by my opinion

Re: [SCM] x42-plugins/master: Exclude mipsel from build.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-06-18 15:43, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: a very wild and uneducated check reveals that the build is parallelized (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=5). could that somehow be causing the problem? x42-plugins not having parallel build enabled ...

Re: Introducing myself - Joël Krähemann

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi, great! welcome. On 2015-06-11 13:14, Joël Krähemann wrote: have created an alioth account https://alioth.debian.org/account/register.php. - that is very nice ;-) would you mind sharing your user name, so we can actually add your digital

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-27 09:49, Tino Mettler wrote: I prepared a new repository. cool. - as this package has never been in debian before, you can trim the debian/changelog to a bare minimum (that is: a single section for 1.5-1 [sic!]) Done. but then

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

On 2015-05-27 12:59, Tino Mettler wrote: I hope you are ok withe the current state of the package. so lintian stil gives me one error and a couple of informational warnings. the error *must* be fixed before we can upload it, the informational tags should be fixed (and are really mostly

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: On 2015-05-27 12:59, Tino Mettler wrote: How will maintainership within the debian-multimedia team work? Where will the git repository be hosted? I already have a guest account for collab-maint on git.debian.org. the place for our git packages

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-05-27 12:59, Tino Mettler wrote: How will maintainership within the debian-multimedia team work? Where will the git repository be hosted? I already have a guest account for collab-maint on git.debian.org. the place for our git packages

Re: Seeking for sponsorship for linuxptp (PTP/IEEE1588 implementation)

On 2015-06-02 14:26, Tino Mettler wrote: would you like to fix them at the alioth repository? Hi, Done. cool, thanks. Now lintian --pedantic linuxptp_1.5-1_amd64.changes only shows 2 warnings that I can't do anything about (debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature and

Re: multiple uploaders

IOhannes On 2014-11-08 14:53, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: due to a few recent mails [1], i was wondering how much we (would like to) enforce our 2 uploaders per package rule. i know of at least one package i maintain under the hood of pkg-multimedia-maintainers, which has only a single

Re: Comments regarding pd-iemguts_0.1-1_amd64.changes

On 08/22/2015 11:36 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hi, LICENSE.txt says it is GPL-2+ but the file header say it is only GPL-2. Is this intentional? i talked with upstream and they say that this is not intentional but rather an oversight, and that they indeed intend the license to be GPL-2+.

Re: Bug#802365: sooperlooper: FTBFS: sigc++-2.0 requires -std=c++11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 dear libsigc++ maintainers, On 2015-10-22 10:24, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> i also just noticed that libsigc++-2.0_2.6.1-3 (uploaded to >>> unstable *yesterday*) now includes the "-std=c++11" flag in >>> their pkg-config CFLAGS, exactly to prevent

Re: Bug#802365: sooperlooper: FTBFS: sigc++-2.0 requires -std=c++11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-10-22 10:24, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > I just updated pbuilder environment ( I am doing often ) and now it > is fine and build. :/ Should we tighten build deps to > libsigc++-2.0_2.6.1-3 ? i guess you meant >=2.6.1-3... anyhow: maybe. it

Re: Bug#802365: sooperlooper: FTBFS: sigc++-2.0 requires -std=c++11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-10-22 09:28, forum::für::umläute wrote: > On 2015-10-22 09:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >> >> thank you a lot for help ... did you tried? It still fails to >> build :( > > yes i did and it did not fail to build for me. > and i just did again

Re: [SCM] giada/master: Added debian/git-tuneclone.sh script

On 11/10/2015 12:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) (2015-11-10 11:55:51) >> On 2015-11-09 21:21, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> happy to see you working on this package ;) >>> Can you explain me please how to use this script in packaging

Re: [SCM] giada/master: Set BUILD_DATE to date from debian/changelog

On 2015-11-15 09:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Indeed the commit message lack that information, but it's needed to make > the build reproducible, as the final d/changelog says: > >* Made build reproducible > * Patch to allow setting of DATE in about-dialog > * Set BUILD_DATE to date

Re: [SCM] giada/master: Added debian/git-tuneclone.sh script

On 2015-11-09 21:21, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > Hi IOhannes, > > happy to see you working on this package ;) > Can you explain me please how to use this script in packaging ? just run it once after you've checked out the repo. it will setup common git-related things, like ignoring the quilt

Re: inquery about "GPL with commercial exception"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-10-08 16:32, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > Anyway, further discussing the matter won't clarify it much. The > clear result, /methinks, is that we all agree this is DFSG-unfree. > Whether it is distributable in non-free... Is subject to >

Re: ardour transitional dummy packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 (MUA crashed while sending; sorry if this comes through doubly) On 2015-10-20 10:28, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 20.10.2015, 09:31 +0200 schrieb IOhannes m > zmölnig (Debian/GNU): >> when we should drop "transition

Re: ardour transitional dummy packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-10-20 08:12, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi IOhannes, > > when we should drop "transitional dummy packages"? until stretch has been released. so people who are using Debian/stable (and only upgrade when a new Debian release comes out) get an

Re: Bug#802365: sooperlooper: FTBFS: sigc++-2.0 requires -std=c++11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-10-21 09:00, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi all, > > I tried build sooperlooper with CFLAGS += -std=c++11 in > debian/rules file "-std=c++11" enables C++11 support, which - as the name suggests - is a C++ "mode". the flag should be added to the

Re: pd-rtclib_4.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 10/21/2015 12:00 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi IOhannes, > > unfortunately I have to reject your package. > > The file LICENSE.txt starts with: > "This software is copyrighted by Karlheinz Essl and others." > your license block in debian/copyright starts with: > "This software is

Re: Bug#802365: sooperlooper: FTBFS: sigc++-2.0 requires -std=c++11

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-10-21 10:42, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > so¹ it seems that there are two (unrelated) problems: - the > "-std=c++11" flags are not passed on to the submodules (libs/pbd & > libs/midi++) - sooperlooper as

Re: setbfree DM flag

On 09/24/2015 09:22 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Would somebody advocates me? i think so. gfmadsr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Re: inquery about "GPL with commercial exception"

On 10/09/2015 03:40 AM, Ben Finney wrote: >> > - they could dual-license the work under "GPL+exceptions" (to spare >> > their happy audience) and under a "Linux Sampler License" (which would >> > be the same but under a different name) just to clarify. the proposal was to dual-license under (1) a

Bug#800834: ardour: Freesound search stops work

Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: tags -1 upstream thanks On 10/04/2015 09:37 AM, Massimo Barbieri wrote: > Package: ardour > Version: 1:4.2~dfsg-5 > Severity: minor > > Dear Maintainer, > in the add media window the freesound search by tag doesn't show any results. > Thanks for your work!

Re: RFS: smplayer-themes/1:15.6.0-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-10-07 14:18, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > * Add debian/sources/lintian-overrides to override lintian > warnings about copyright. why? i mean; why haven't you fixed the underlying issues instead? e.g. copyright-format/1.0 explicitely states

Re: Updating LV2 stack serd sord lilv

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-10-13 10:27, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi, > > just trying update serd package (lv2 stack) and it is not > installing documentation as expected :( I've tried few things (not > pushed in git repo) to fix it. > > Can somebody have a look and

Re: Updating LV2 stack serd sord lilv

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-10-13 11:37, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > hmm, not sure whether i understand the problem. assuming it is > something more complicated than using the attached > libserd-doc.install, what is then? ah, i think this was

Re: pd-tclpd_0.3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 08/27/2015 07:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: Hi IOhannes, please add the missing license of tclpd-0.3.0\examples\colorpicker.tcl to your debian/copyright. thanks for catching that. re-uploaded with the fixed debian/copyright. gfmards IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

lives: Depending on plugins? Suggesting with archs?

hi, i wonder why lives has a *hard* dependency on frei0r-plugins. will it refuse work if that set of plugins (that are dlopen()ed) are not present on the system? i would like to move it to 'Recommends', to allow for more flexibility for installations. i also wonder why there is an

Bug#798341: [inkscape] impossible to install inkscape

On 2015-09-09 14:46, Marco Righi wrote: > The problem is not resolved (the test are below). > > Regarding the hybrid configuration, I think it is a problem > because there not exists the last version of a library but your are > branching them so my Linux "lives" using some library from a branch >

Bug#798341: [inkscape] impossible to install inkscape

On 2015-09-09 09:52, Marco Righi wrote: [...] > inkscape : Depends: libatkmm-1.6-1 (>= 2.22.1) but it is not going to > be installed in the past few weeks, Debian has seen a major transition (of the core components for any C++-related software in Debian) that affected *many* packages and

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote: > > So here's the suggestion. Instead of > >ardour -> a2 >ardour3 -> a3 >ardour4 -> a4 > > I propose > >ardour -> a4 >ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie) >drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) ) > now

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

On 2015-09-15 00:20, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Yes but latest debian release from 2007 30MB now in 2015 250MB I > am assuming that size still can rise in future. Also I believe that > usually user using just couple of favorite drumkits and not need > all of of them maybe. So I am thinking to safe

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

On 2015-09-15 10:15, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-09-15 9:46 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard : >> If you mean encourage upstream to offer out-of-band download and then >> _not_ package those drumkits for Debian to "safe packager's load" then I >> find that a very bad idea: Our users

Bug#778363: ardour3: Segfault when importing a midi file

i can reproduce the problem. attached you can find a backtrace. however: the segfault seems to have gone in ardour-4 (as provided by the "ardour" package). i don't think fixing the problem is worth it, esp. since the "ardour3" package will be removed from the archives in the (near?) future.

Bug#692201: ardour: Segfaults when using the freezing regions

unable to reproduce this problem with ardour_1:4.2~dfsg-2 can you confirm that the problem has been fixed? gfmasrd IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-17 10:34, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > So what we need now is to tune get-orig-source script to get only > DFSG compatible drumkits? Can we also get copyright file in in orig > tar ball? the main problem i see here, is that the license fields

Re: Fwd: ardour3 4.1~dfsg-1 MIGRATED to testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-14 05:55, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2015-09-13 22:38 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig > : >> On 09/13/2015 08:50 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: >>> i'm also just building ardour, and if everything goes well >>> will

linuxsampler?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 i was wondering why we don't package "linuxsampler". it pops up in several "suggests" (e.g. it's frontend "qsampler", or the "multimedia-samplers" task) it apparently is non-free, but is this the only reason? (i searched the net, but couldn't find

inquery about "GPL with commercial exception"

i'm currently thinking about packaging "linuxsampler", which has a somewhat abominable license, which they call "GPL with commercial exception" [1]. however, it is unclear whether this license allows us to distribute the software in "non-free", or whether the contradictory nature renders the

Bug#800022: ardour3: Last upgrade removed Ardour4

On 09/25/2015 03:55 PM, Massimo Barbieri wrote: > Package: ardour3 > Version: 1:3.5.403~dfsg-4 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > last upgrade of my Debian testing removed ardour4 and now I have ardour3. > > Thanks for your work. that's rather by intention: the "ardour3" package

Re: inquery about "GPL with commercial exception"

hi, thanks for the quick reply. On 09/29/2015 06:58 PM, Jeff Epler wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:14:11PM +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) > wrote: >> i'm currently thinking about packaging "linuxsampler", which has a >> somewhat abominable l

Re: inquery about "GPL with commercial exception"

On 09/29/2015 06:58 PM, Jeff Epler wrote: > As a consequence of the second item, I believe LinuxSampler is not > distributable at all alessio brought to my attention that the license of LinuxSampler was already discussed on debian-legal 10 years ago, and it seems that they came to a similar

Bug#760758: amb-plugins: spurious LADSPA_PROPERTY_REALTIME

On 09/09/2015 06:40 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there any progress with this topic? Does any body contacted Richard Furse > as has been suggested? i have now. http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2015-September/036096.html gcmsr IOhannes signature.asc

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-21 10:54, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > On 2015-09-20 11:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>>> i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a >>>> crasher bug (#778363) triggered by loading

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 hi, On 2015-09-22 12:26, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote: > Hi all, > > Reading at this discussion, I'd just want to mention that dispite > this package is called "hydrogen-drumkits", it does install other > stuffs as well, demo songs in

Re: Bug#799649: stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-21 14:54, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Please go ahead. I do not know when I will have time to look at > this, so do not wait on me. > afaict, sramacher has expressed his intention to take care of stk "tonight" (sent ~5 mins after simons

Re: hydrogen-drumkits package

On 2015-09-14 23:09, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi Alessio, Jonas, others > > I jumped in to updating hydrogen-drumkits package ... I updated it and > realize that it is really huge! :( ... About 250MB > I think something so big doesn't make sense distribute in debian. > > What we should do with

Fwd: Re: licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact)

Forwarded Message Subject: Re: licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:42:00 +0300 From: Artemiy Pavlov <arte...@sinevib.es> To: "IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)" <umlae...@debian.org> Hi again :-) “just pick any and don't b

Re: licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact)

On 09/21/2015 04:29 PM, Artemiy Pavlov wrote: > Hi again! > > Here is the list of kits that I can share via any license you like: > > - VariBreaks > - HardElectro > - Electric Empire > - HipHop-1 > - HipHop-2 > - EasternHop > - Synthie-1 > thanks for the kind offer. even though you allow use

licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-09-21 15:47, Artemiy Pavlov wrote: > Hi there! > > Some of the sounds in these drum kits were created by me, and some > were taken from a collection of drum machine samples that one of my > friends allowed to use. I can grant you any

Fwd: Re: licenses for h2o drumkits (was Re: Sinevibes contact)

share via any license you like: - - VariBreaks - - HardElectro - - Electric Empire - - HipHop-1 - - HipHop-2 - - EasternHop - - Synthie-1 Artemiy. Sent from my iPad > On 21 Sep 2015, at 5:14 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) > <umlae...@debian.org> wrote: > >> On 2015

question regarding license of hydrogen drumkits

rogen-drumkits" for the Debian/GNU linux distribution (as part of the "pkg-multimedia-maintainers", CCed). Debian as a project is committed to deliver "free" (as in speech) software and data to our users. whenever you install something from Debian, you can be sure that y

Bug#799649: stk: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

On 2015-09-21 14:54, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Please go ahead. I do not know when I will have time to look at this, > so do not wait on me. afaik, sramacher has expressed his intention to take care of stk "tonight" (sent ~5 mins after simons mail) to take care of STK. so you might want to wait

Re: Packaging ardour 4.0

On 2015-09-20 11:25, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug >>> (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that should be >>> raised to "important"). >> >> I would remove it. i'd like to hear adrian on this first. > > What

Re: Question for future Debian builds

On 12/07/2015 09:07 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > I personally would prefer to have JUCE in debian separately rather > than embedded library, +1 > but I am afraid that I am busy too much at the > moment to work on it myself. +1 i think last time i checked, JUCE was an *awful mess* (from a

Re: Request for review & inclusion: supercollider-sc3-plugins (see RFP #807364)

On 01/04/2016 02:32 PM, Hanno Zulla wrote: > - the packages are depending on (= ${binary:Version}) for each other are you sure that "supercollider-sc3-plugins-sclang" must *Depend* on "supercollider-sc3-plugins-scsynth"? what if i want to run language and synth on different computers? i'd

Bug#810006: supercollider-language: sclang should not Depend on scsynth

Package: supercollider-language Version: 1:3.6.6~repack-2-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, sclang (supercollider-lang) and scsynth (supercollider-synth) can be run on different machines, so sclang does not strictly require the scsynth to be installed. as a consequence i would suggest to drop

Re: debian-multimedia_0.4_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 01/08/2016 06:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > > Sorry Felipe, but I need you to sponsor when you find time. > i took the liberty to upload the package. thanks for your work. gamdsr IOhannes ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Re: Question for future Debian builds

On 12/21/2015 02:04 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote: > finally: embedding libraries is generally frowned upon, to eliminate > duplicate work. so as long as giada were the only package using JUCE, > embedding it would probably be OK, but once other applications start > usin

Re: Question for future Debian builds

On 2015-12-20 17:53, Giada LoopMachine wrote: > > Hey guys, > > Sorry for the delay! I perfectly understand your pain with JUCE and it's > (non)packaging status. Actually we are considering shipping "raw" JUCE's > source code, with no pre-compiled or embedded libraries around. That way > JUCE

Bug#810765: ardour: FTBFS[!linux]: depends on cwiid, alsa

Control: Tags -1 pending thanks On 01/12/2016 02:28 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Package: ardour > Version: 1:4.4~dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > ardour has become BD-Uninstallable on kfreebsd and hurd due to > Build-Depends: > - cwiid, which is linux-specific; > -

Re: Bug#825186: Please which tasks should be installed at a default installation of the blend

On 05/27/2016 10:06 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > Maybe we just install the lot (except devel) for Stretch, and aim for > a more fine-grained method for Buster? so it seems like you went for that option. that's certainly the easiest route from *our* perspective. > > To expand on your last sentence,

Bug#825411: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat './config.guess': No such file or directory

Control: reassign -1 cdbs thanks This is really a regression in CDBS. mgfsar IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#825993: Rosegarden is not proposed when opening .rg files

On 2016-06-01 10:34, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I agree that the approach has some disadvantage, and the one you quotes > is the major one, but I believe it is less of a disadvantage for > unskilled users than having Rosegarden fail to show up as an alternative > when he is trying to open a

Re: Fwd: rtaudio package

On 06/19/2016 07:03 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Should we provide special package for rtaudio-config or simply drop it? i think the wisdom tends towards not shipping it. however, in order to make the experience for users of the Debian package similar to those who installed directly from upstream,

Re: preparing new RtMidi release, question about SO version

On 02/10/2016 06:21 PM, Stephen Sinclair wrote: > Previous versions have made the error of treating SO version like the > version number, and producing binaries e.g. librtmidi.so.2.1.0. > > I was recommending changing this to properly reflect ABI > compatibility. What would Debian maintainers

Re: Ardour 4.7 released

On 02/22/2016 06:54 PM, Adrian Knoth wrote: > Hi! > > Anybody working on ardour 4.7 currently? If not, I might find an hour > later today to make that happen. i don't. go ahead! fgmadsr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [SCM] ardour/master: Changelog and release

On 02/22/2016 10:12 PM, adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: > commit ecb950a5b8fd836f6e7ad868fa9602167faab25e > +ardour (1:4.7~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low is there any specific reason to set the urgency to "low"? afaik, these days the default is "medium", which gives us 5 days for

Re: failed kfreebsd-i386 build of ardour 1:4.6~dfsg-1

On 01/19/2016 05:59 PM, Debian buildds wrote: > * Source package: ardour > * Version: 1:4.6~dfsg-1 > * Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 > * State: failed > * Suite: sid > * Builder: fils.debian.org > * Build log: >

ITA: snd -- Sound file editor

Control: retitle -1 ITA: snd -- Sound file editor thanks. i intend to adopt this package under the pkg-multimedia umbrella. (volunteers step forward!) gfamrds IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: orphaning packages

On 2016-02-16 12:57, Alessio Treglia wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:47 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) > <umlae...@debian.org> wrote: >> i was wondering whether you shouldn't have posted to the pkg-multimedia >> list about this ("i'm going

Re: orphaning packages

On 2016-02-16 15:44, Alessio Treglia wrote: > As an aside note, I'll file an O: bug for all those packages for which > I am the sole mentioned in the Uploaders list. ``` $ grep-dctrl -s Package \ -F Maintainer pkg-multimedia \ --and -F Uploaders "ales...@debian.org" \ --and --not -F

Re: pd-bsaylor not 64 bit conform

hi, On 02/19/2016 04:29 PM, Alexander Tuchaček wrote: > hallo maintainer of the pd-bsaylor package, > > there is a bug in the pd-bsaylor module, the external pvoc is not 64 bit > capable , > > see patch: > https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/patches/540/ > thanks for the bug-report. for

Bug#820347: juce: diff for NMU version 4.1.0+repack-4.1

On 04/07/2016 08:38 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:40:41 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna debian.org> wrote: [...] >> >> Dear maintainer, >> >> I have prepared a patch for juce, but I don't feel confident with it, > so I didn't upload as NMU. [...] > > Hi

Bug#820431: smplayer: Please keep the package in the repository up-to-date

Control: found -1 15.11.0~ds0-1 Control: notfound -1 16.4.0 Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: tags -1 pending Thanks On 04/08/2016 01:22 PM, Simon wrote: > Package: smplayer > Version: 16.4.0 hmm, as far as i understand, if the package version was 16.4.0 than this bug-report would be void.

Bug#820653: juce: incorrect Homepage

Control: tags -1 pending Thanks. On 04/11/2016 05:28 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > Source: juce > Severity: normal > > The Homepage for juce is incorrect, it should be this instead: > > https://www.juce.com/ > > The current homepage redirects to a domain squatter website: > >

Re: Mudita24 ready for uploading/re-adopting

On 03/22/2016 01:27 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > ?? I did bump the Standards-Version from 3.9.3 to 3.9.7 (after checking > the changelist - as Jonas reminded us). Did I miss something? no. for whatever reason, i misread the lintian-warning on mentors.d.n on thought it was an

Bug#816603: Ardour (4) - Adding FR translation to the desktop file

salut, thanks for your contribution. i have one question though: On 03/03/2016 01:42 PM, treb...@tuxfamily.org wrote: > GenericName[fr]=Enregistreur audio numérique Ardour 4 my french is a bit rusty, but this translation seems to be a bit too specific (ardour is much more than just a recording

Re: joining the team

On 2016-04-04 11:39, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > 1) I prefer a Team Upload, you are part of the team now. > 2) std-version is not 3.9.7, please update > 3) I prefer autoreconf instead of autotools-dev > 4) somebody already imported the new release on git 5) get rid of all the lintian-errors

Re: Mudita24 ready for uploading/re-adopting

On 03/21/2016 12:43 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: > It would be great if a DD could take a look and sponsor, done. > or give DM > upload rights. done. thanks for your work. gfmards IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Bug#822597: deken: depends on gksu which is deprecated

Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream Thanks. On 04/25/2016 05:01 PM, po...@debian.org wrote: > Source: deken > Severity: important > Tags: sid stretch > User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: oldlibs gksu > > Hi, > > deken depends on gksu, which is deprecated and

patch for giada: only build JUCE artefacts when compiling with VST support

dear giada devs, while upgrading the Debian package for giada, I noticed that the test-suite contains some juce-tests even when configured without WITH_VST. since JUCE is only needed when WITH_VST is set (and the giada Debian package has the included juce dropped, the JUCE Debian package has the

ITA: faust -- functional programming language for realtime audio applications

Control: retitle -1 ITA: faust -- functional programming language for realtime audio applications Control: owner -1 umlae...@debian.org Thanks. hi mario, i'm interested in adopting faust (within the pkg-multimedia-maintainers team). the PTS has no link to a packaging git. does such a thing

Re: supercollider is marked for autoremoval from testing

On 05/09/2016 04:20 PM, Hanno Zulla wrote: > We probably should keep in mind that after the release of supercollider > 3.7.0, the supercollider-sc3-plugins source package needs a minor > version bump too, to get its binaries compiled against the new > supercollider-dev package. > > I will try to

Re: rtaudio transtion

On 08/01/2016 12:25 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi, > > there is on going rtaudo transtion and jacktrip is last package not > confirmed/fixed to build with rtaudio 4.1.2 > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828951 thx for the ping. i'll have a look at it today. gfamrds IOhannes

Bug#833271: librtaudio-dev: rtaudio.pc depends on libpulse-simple

Package: librtaudio-dev Version: 4.1.2~ds0-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, the rtaudio.pc as shipped with librtaudio-dev declares a dependency on libpulse-simple: $ cat /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/rtaudio.pc | grep pulse Requires: alsa libpulse-simple $

Re: [SCM] rtaudio/master: Add libpulse-dev to deps of -dev package. (Closes: #833271)

On 08/02/2016 04:42 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > I hope this is correct fix. > It should be according bug description. > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833271 > IOhannes can you comment on this please? in theory i agree with felipe. in practice there might be more

Re: Bug#833305: jacktrip: FTBFS: RtAudioInterface.h:41:21: fatal error: RtAudio.h: No such file or directory

On 08/03/2016 07:28 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2016-08-02 20:00 GMT+02:00 Chris Lamb : >> Source: jacktrip >> Version: 1.1~repack-4 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: fails to build from source >> User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org >> Usertags: ftbfs >>

.gitignore (was Re: Help offered with xwax package)

On 2016-08-10 11:52, James Cowgill wrote: >> Actually we should repack ( to get rid of upstream .gitignore file and >> > use our .gitignore file ) and rename. > You don't actually need to do that (and arguably you should not repack > orig tarballs unless you need to). For source format "3.0

Re: Help offered with xwax package

On 2016-08-10 12:00, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: >>> >> $ uscan --report-status >>> >> Processing watchfile line for package xwax... >>> >> Newest version on remote site is 1.6-beta2, local version is 1.6~beta2 >>> >> xwax: Newer version (1.6-beta2) available on remote site: >>> >>

Re: composite_0.006.2+dfsg0-7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On 01/15/2017 06:36 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > 2017-01-12 16:03 GMT+01:00 Debian FTP Masters < > ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org>: >> >> >> Accepted: >> > > Thank you IOhannes for fixing and uploading! > i was under the impression that the discussion between you and jonas happened a couple of

  1   2   3   >