On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:02:45AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
- @sed -e s/!VERSION!/@JACK_RELEASE@/g -e s/!DATE!/`date '+%B %Y'`/g
$*.0 $@
+ @sed -e s/!VERSION!/@JACK_RELEASE@/g -e s/!DATE!/`LANG=C date --utc
--date=`dpkg-parsechangelog -l../debian/changelog -SDate` '+%B %Y'`/g
ld.patch b/debian/patches/reproducible-build.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..e41f445
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/reproducible-build.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Author: Reiner Herrmann <rei...@reiner-h.de>
+Description: Sort source files for deterministic linking order
+
+--- a/S
Source: pyliblo
Version: 0.9.2-1
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
Hi!
While working on Debian's “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have
noticed that pyliblo-utils had different dependencies in two different
builds [2].
In the first build it had:
Depends:
an/patches/reproducible-build.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..d533807
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/reproducible-build.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+Author: Reiner Herrmann <rei...@reiner-h.de>
+Description: Strip build date and user to get reproducible build
+
+--- a/flite.c
b/flite.c
b7cb5a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/04-reproducible-build.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Author: Reiner Herrmann <rei...@reiner-h.de>
+Description: Don't embed build date into version number
+
+--- a/configure.in
b/configure.in
+@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
+ TAO_MAJOR_VERSION=1
+ TAO_MINOR_VERSION=0
+
producible-build.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..173c962
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/reproducible-build.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+Author: Reiner Herrmann <rei...@reiner-h.de>
+Description: strip build date to enable reproducible building
+
+--- a/Makefile
b/Makefile
+@@ -19,
an/patches/reproducible-build.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..e4eb74a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/reproducible-build.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+Author: Reiner Herrmann <rei...@reiner-h.de>
+Description: Sort list of source files for deterministic linking order
+
+--- a/compiler/Make
Package: audacity
Version: 2.1.2-2
Tags: upstream
Dear maintainer,
I noticed that Audacity loses recorded audio when a saved project is removed
from
the filesystem, even though it is still open.
It happened to me when I wanted to export something as an audio file, but
accidentally saved
the
tches/0002-reproducible-build.patch b/debian/patches/0002-reproducible-build.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..57a1dd8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/0002-reproducible-build.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+Author: Reiner Herrmann <rei...@reiner-h.de>
+Description: Strip build date from version in
producible-build.patch b/debian/patches/02-reproducible-build.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..994ff12
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/02-reproducible-build.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+Author: Reiner Herrmann <rei...@reiner-h.de>
+Description: Strip build date from version in
producible-build.patch b/debian/patches/0001-reproducible-build.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..352a498
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/0001-reproducible-build.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+Author: Reiner Herrmann <rei...@reiner-h.de>
+Description: Strip build date from version in
Source: paulstretch
Version: 2.2-2-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: fileordering
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that paulstretch could
tches/0013-Reproducible-builds.patch b/debian/patches/0013-Reproducible-builds.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..d7151a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/0013-Reproducible-builds.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Author: Reiner Herrmann <rei...@reiner-h.de>
+Description: Sort list of source files f
13 matches
Mail list logo