On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 20:17 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Do you understand the change you've linked to?
As I've said, I've only had a first glance i.e. looking at the commit
log, which mentioned that the downloading must take place, but didn't
clearly say whether this is automated or not.
Source: libav
Severity: wishlist
Tags: security
Hi.
Apparently upstream has choosen the same stupid way, that Mozilla (see e.g.
#769716)
did before to include OpenH264.
AFAICS on a first glance, this is done via downloading the blob distributed by
Cisco, for which no one knows what it really
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 20:07 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
So, no bug here. There's not even an alpha release of libav 12 available
yet.
Well... first, it was severity=wishlist, thus not necessarily a bug...
and 2nd, these changes will likely hit a release or may be introduced
via some
On 2015-01-07 20:12:30, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 20:07 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
So, no bug here. There's not even an alpha release of libav 12 available
yet.
Well... first, it was severity=wishlist, thus not necessarily a bug...
and 2nd, these changes
