AFCR Industrial Glove

___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Bug#797113: libdvd-pkg doesn't respect APT's proxy settings when downloading libdvdcss

Package: libdvd-pkg Version: 1.3.99-1-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? Attempting to add libdvd-pkg to Tails, which uses an HTTP proxy when building its image. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? echo

Bug#797113: libdvd-pkg doesn't respect APT's proxy settings when downloading libdvdcss

On Aug 27, 2015 8:55 PM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org wrote: Hi Austin, On Thursday 27 August 2015 18:58:51 Austin English wrote: Thanks for the suggestion, but uscan also fails: I'm sorry that `uscan` did not work for you. I had a thought about this problem and I think using APT

Bug#797113: libdvd-pkg doesn't respect APT's proxy settings when downloading libdvdcss

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > On Monday 31 August 2015 00:58:50 Austin English wrote: >> Would you consider switching to using curl? I've attached a patch >> which does so (which fixes my issue when building tai

Bug#797113: libdvd-pkg doesn't respect APT's proxy settings when downloading libdvdcss

Hi Dmitry, On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Dmitry Smirnov only...@debian.org wrote: Hi Austin, On Thursday 27 August 2015 15:48:13 Austin English wrote: I expect the download to use apt's proxy, and libdvdcss to build built. libdvd-pkg uses `wget` by but (in case of failure

Bug#824078: libdvd-pkg: fails to report "apt-get check" errors (and others) correctly

On May 28, 2016 4:20 AM, "Dmitry Smirnov" <only...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Friday, 20 May 2016 12:50:48 AM AEST Austin English wrote: > > I understand that there's a *potential* problem. > > Potential problem of breaking APT operations is much more dangerous t

Bug#824078: libdvd-pkg: fails to report "apt-get check" errors (and others) correctly

On Mon, 16 May 2016 00:10:35 +1000 Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Sunday, 15 May 2016 3:15:50 PM AEST Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > instead of being told again and again how much of a snow flake > > your package is, and how OK it is for it to behave like it currently does. > > You