Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Comments regarding ilmbase_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes

Hi there, On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > On 2017-12-27 at 16:17 (GMT), Thorsten Alteholz wrote: >> Hi Matteo, >> >> as this is a new version, why did this ugly license of halfExport.h appeared >> again? >> Shouldn't there be an upstream fix ->

[Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2 2.5.16-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the libgphoto2 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.5.16-1 Current version: 2.5.16-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

[Pkg-phototools-devel] ilmbase_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by email ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Comments regarding ilmbase_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes

On 2017-12-27 at 16:17 (GMT), Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi Matteo, > > as this is a new version, why did this ugly license of halfExport.h appeared > again? > Shouldn't there be an upstream fix -> #843594 Holy shhh... No idea why the fixing commit hasn't been integrated in the latest release.

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Comments regarding ilmbase_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes

Hi Matteo, as this is a new version, why did this ugly license of halfExport.h appeared again? Shouldn't there be an upstream fix -> #843594 Thorsten ___ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org