Your message dated Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:50:52 -0300
with message-id <87poee354j....@tesseract.cs.unb.ca>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#831744: darktable: Camera
profile for denoise disappears
has caused the Debian Bug report #831744,
regarding darktable: Camera profile for denoise disappears
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
831744: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831744
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: darktable
Version: 2.0.5-2
Severity: important
Darktable has a profiled denoise function, which applies denoising on an image
based on ISO and Camera type. When I use this function, the camera profile
disappears after some time. When Darktable is started, the profile is there.
However, after some time, the camera specific profile disappears, and only the
generic poissionian is shown. This causes very heavy noise reduction.
I found issue #10340 in the darktable issue database
(https://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10340) and tried the command found there:
$ darktable -d control | grep noiseprofile
This at first shows:
> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> [noiseprofile] found 11 makers
> [noiseprofile] found `Sony' as `Sony'
> [noiseprofile] found 36 models
> [noiseprofile] found DSLR-A200
> [noiseprofile] found 6 profiles
> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> [noiseprofile] found 11 makers
> [noiseprofile] found `Sony' as `Sony'
> [noiseprofile] found 36 models
> [noiseprofile] found DSLR-A200
> [noiseprofile] found 6 profiles
> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> [noiseprofile] found 11 makers
> [noiseprofile] found `Sony' as `Sony'
> [noiseprofile] found 36 models
> [noiseprofile] found DSLR-A200
> [noiseprofile] found 6 profiles
when these messages are printed, the noise profiles for my camera (guess what
type of camera I have ;) are available in Darktable.
When the profile disappears, the following is shown by the debug output:
> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
> [noiseprofile] found 11 makers
> [noiseprofile] found 11 makers
> [noiseprofile] found `Sony' as `Sony'
> [noiseprofile] found `Sony' as `Sony'
> [noiseprofile] found 36 models
> [noiseprofile] found 36 models
> [noiseprofile] found DSLR-A200
> [noiseprofile] found 6 profiles
> [noiseprofile] found DSLR-A200
> [noiseprofile] found 6 profiles
> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
>
> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_ref: assertion
> 'object->ref_count > 0' failed
>
> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_has_member: assertion
> 'object != NULL' failed
> [noiseprofile] found -1 makers
> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
>
> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_ref: assertion
> 'object->ref_count > 0' failed
>
> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_has_member: assertion
> 'object != NULL' failed
> [noiseprofile] found -1 makers
> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
>
> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_ref: assertion
> 'object->ref_count > 0' failed
>
> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_has_member: assertion
> 'object != NULL' failed
> [noiseprofile] found -1 makers
>
> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_ref: assertion
> 'object->ref_count > 0' failed
> [noiseprofile] looking for maker `Sony', model `DSLR-A200'
>
> (darktable:21855): Json-CRITICAL **: json_object_has_member: assertion
> 'object != NULL' failed
> [noiseprofile] found -1 makers
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (450, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages darktable depends on:
ii libatk1.0-0 2.20.0-1
ii libc6 2.22-11
ii libcairo-gobject2 1.14.6-1+b1
ii libcairo2 1.14.6-1+b1
ii libcolord-gtk1 0.1.26-1
ii libcolord2 1.3.2-1
ii libcups2 2.1.4-1
ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.47.0-1
ii libexiv2-14 0.25-3
ii libflickcurl0 1.25-3
ii libgcc1 1:6.1.1-7
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.34.0-1
ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 11.2.2-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.48.1-1
ii libglu1-mesa [libglu1] 9.0.0-2.1
ii libgomp1 6.1.1-7
ii libgphoto2-6 2.5.10-3
ii libgphoto2-port12 2.5.10-3
ii libgraphicsmagick-q16-3 1.3.24-1
ii libgtk-3-0 3.20.6-1
ii libice6 2:1.0.9-1+b1
ii libilmbase12 2.2.0-11
ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.5.0-1
ii libjs-prototype 1.7.1-3
ii libjs-scriptaculous 1.9.0-2
ii libjson-glib-1.0-0 1.2.0-1
ii liblcms2-2 2.7-1
ii liblensfun1 0.3.2-3
ii liblua5.2-0 5.2.4-1
ii libopenexr22 2.2.0-10
ii libopenjp2-7 2.1.0-2.1+b1
ii libosmgpsmap-1.0-1 1.1.0-1
ii libpango-1.0-0 1.40.1-1
ii libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.40.1-1
ii libpng16-16 1.6.23-1
ii libpugixml1v5 1.7-2
ii librsvg2-2 2.40.16-1
ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.15+dfsg1-4
ii libsecret-1-0 0.18.3-1
ii libsm6 2:1.2.2-1+b1
ii libsoup2.4-1 2.54.1-1
ii libsqlite3-0 3.13.0-1
ii libstdc++6 6.1.1-7
ii libtiff5 4.0.6-1
ii libwebp5 0.4.4-1+b2
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.3-1
ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1
ii libxml2 2.9.3+dfsg1-1.2
ii libxrandr2 2:1.5.0-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
darktable recommends no packages.
darktable suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Jan van de W <debianb...@kiekerjan.isdronken.nl> writes:
> Over the course of the past year I have several times tried to reproduce
> this bug, but I have not succeeded. Indeed, I also no longer see the bug
> without a manual build (i.e. the version as installed by Debian). I think
> this can be closed for lack of progress / reproducability.
Done. It can always be re-opened if someone figures out a reproducer.
d
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
