Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] (04/11/2008):
Anyway, maybe some of you have comments on the current README.Debian
in the unstable branch of hugin.git? If that looks fine to you, I'll
push the tca_correct fix, and upload hugin to unstable, request the
unblock, and then we can move to 0.7.0
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] (03/11/2008):
Ok; if it eats users' hard drives, it can be removed without worrying
about missing functionality, heh.
Sure. :)
In unstable with:
,--
| hugin (0.7.0~svn3191+beta5-2) unstable; urgency=low
|
| * Update README.Debian to reflect the current status
On 2008-11-03 Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering whether it'd be OK to fix #502104 in my next hugin upload
(the only other change being updating README.Debian to point to
pkg-phototools website, for more info about backports, etc.). That'd
mean adding a line (for a single
* Cyril Brulebois [Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:28:27 +0100]:
Hi folks,
I'm wondering whether it'd be OK to fix #502104 in my next hugin upload
(the only other change being updating README.Debian to point to
pkg-phototools website, for more info about backports, etc.). That'd
mean adding a line (for
(Dropping -release for now.)
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (03/11/2008):
I wonder whether it perhaps be possible to get the hugin 0.7.0 release
(instead of beta5) into lenny. Iirc the changes to beta5 are a not
that big, it was released rather quickly afterwards.
I didn't check (the diff)
Hi folks,
I'm wondering whether it'd be OK to fix #502104 in my next hugin upload
(the only other change being updating README.Debian to point to
pkg-phototools website, for more info about backports, etc.). That'd
mean adding a line (for a single binary) to debian/hugin-tools.install,
for a tool
