.
If you file an unblock request, you should include a *binary* debdiff to
the packages in testing, too, to ensure no library dependencies from
unstable get picked up.
On 2013-04-27 10:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 01:45 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
a few Multi-Arch: same packages
On 2015-03-14 13:27, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote:
It would be nice if you do the upload. I belive it would be
faster to close the bug.
OK, uploaded to experimental.
Andreas
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Followup-For: Bug #780240
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
On 2015-03-11 22:20, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote:
There must not be a libgphoto2_port.so.10 symlink in the libgphoto2-port12
package.
Why ? It was important when I did the tests.
Then something is seriously borked in your package.
The new library is not a valid replacement
On 2015-03-13 22:00, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) wrote:
Thanks for checking the package.
Looks good now! Do you need a sponsor to upload this?
Andreas
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
package libgphoto2-port10. (Closes: #780240)
+Thanks Guillem Jover and Andreas Beckmann.
+ * Removed the libgphoto2_port.so.1o symlink.
typo: 10
+ * debian/control: libgphoto2-port10 removed.
+For libgphoto-port12
Hi,
maybe it's even time to remove the old transitional libgphoto2-2-dev
package? (libsane-dev seems to be the only package still having a
dependency on the old transitional one)
Andreas
___
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
On 2015-03-12 06:53, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: libgphoto2-port12
Architecture: any
Multi-Arch: same
Breaks: libgphoto2-port10 ( 2.5.5)
Replaces: libgphoto2-port10 ( 2.5.5)
I don't think these Breaks+Replaces are needed at all, the filelist
(except for the wrong symlink) does
Package: openexr,libopenexr-dev
Version: 1.6.1-9
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package does not
bahave sanely.
Your package ships:
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2015-01-28 13:58 ./usr/share/doc/
drwxr-xr-x
Package: openexr-doc
Version: 1.6.1-9
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because it tries
Followup-For: Bug #782106
Control: found -1 1.6.1-11
More problems of this sort:
Selecting previously unselected package openexr-doc.
Preparing to unpack .../openexr-doc_1.6.1-11_all.deb ...
Unpacking openexr-doc (1.6.1-11) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
Followup-For: Bug #782098
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi Mathieu,
attached is a patch that performs a proper symlink_to_dir transition for
the packages openexr and libopenexr-dev.
Andreas
From 5bc903be37e65a7ade0335116a7b0422bc99272c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #782106
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi Mathieu,
attached is a patch that adds the missing Replaces.
Andreas
From bf76cd810514f4ec7ecfe6f74c5627e71ef0e2dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:51:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] openexr
Control: found -1 2.2.0-3
On 2015-09-13 15:51, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> Could you please be little more verbose than just:
I wanted to followup with more information, but got distracted by something ...
> I have not been able to reproduce your issue using openexr 1.6.1-8.1
> ->
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 16:49:06 +0200 Simon Frei <2007pf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Versions of packages enfuse depends on:
> ii libboost-filesystem1.55.0 1.55.0+dfsg-4
> ii libstdc++6 5.2.1-16
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x7695562b in
Package: libopenimageio-doc
Version: 1.6.10~dfsg0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'stretch' fails
because it tries to
16 matches
Mail list logo
