Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#523512: gthumb no longer imports RAW files when shooting both jpg and NEF

2009-04-10 Thread David Paleino
reassign 523512 libgphoto2-2 retitle 523512 RAW .NEF images are recognized as application/x-unknown thanks On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:21:04 +0200, Guillaume Gimenez wrote: I re-installed shared-mime-info but it does not help. BTW application/x-unknown is hard coded in libgphoto2 sources. Ouch!

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#531978: libgphoto2: Any update on that RC bug ?

2010-11-08 Thread David Paleino
Hello all, On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:38:32 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [..] For the record, I've got the whole X stack to keep me busy. The libgphoto2 package is (supposed to be easily) team-maintained. So anyone can upload a fix package, at any time. And NMUs are welcome as well, of course.

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#531978: Testing fix for gThumb's import function with PTP cameras

2010-11-08 Thread David Paleino
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:42:57 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On lun., 2010-11-08 at 13:37 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On lun., 2010-11-08 at 11:50 +0100, David Paleino wrote: Hello people, I'm writing to you to ask for testing with gThumb's import function and your PTP cameras

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#582296: Re-test with latest version

2010-11-11 Thread David Paleino
Hello, I'm writing to you because you posted a comment on Debian bug #582296 . I recently uploaded a new revision of libgphoto2 (2.4.6-3) to sid -- would you please be so kind to verify if you still have your old problems? For your reference:

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#603384: Cannot trivially download photos from a simple SD card

2010-11-13 Thread David Paleino
reassign 603384 libgphoto2-port0 fixed 603384 2.4.10.1-2 found 603384 2.4.6-3 Ciao, On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:14:13 +, Enrico Zini wrote: I am trying to reproduce #512883 so I could try to debug it, but I didn't get as far as the bug reporter did. I have photos on a SD card put in my laptop

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#218814: Bug reproducible?

2010-11-15 Thread David Paleino
Hello, I'm writing to you because of an old bug you had with gphoto2 and a Sony DSC P-12 camera. Could you please check whether it's working with the current sid (or even experimental) version? Thank you, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#218814: Bug reproducible?

2010-11-15 Thread David Paleino
(re-sending with the new(?) e-mail address) Hello, I'm writing to you because of an old bug you had with gphoto2 and a Sony DSC P-12 camera. Could you please check whether it's working with the current sid (or even experimental) version? Thank you, David -- . ''`. Debian developer |

[Pkg-phototools-devel] New libgphoto2 in sid

2011-02-14 Thread David Paleino
Hello everybody, I'm planning to upload libgphoto2 2.4.10.1 to sid. There's a package currently in experimental, and I'm now asking maintainers of dependant packages (BCCed) to check whether their package compiles and works fine with it. A dd-list is attached. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Team policy for repository layout?

2011-02-15 Thread David Paleino
Hello everybody, while working on {lib,}gphoto2, I noticed I'm not really used to the debian/-only layout with git. I'm rather more used to git-buildpackage's layout (master+upstream+pristine-tar). Is there a team policy or other forbidding/discouraging this? I'd *really* like convert the current

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

2011-02-26 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: (new) libgphoto2-dev-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc (new) libgphoto2-dev_2.4.10.1-4_i386.deb optional libdevel (new) libgphoto2-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc Just for clarification, these are the NEW packages. The old

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

2011-02-26 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:35:34 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote: David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: (new) libgphoto2-dev-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc (new) libgphoto2

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

2011-02-27 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:13:23 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:35:34 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote: I am asking since there is a non-neglible cost of this transition, 15 rc-bugs

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

2011-02-27 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:04:52 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: (new) libgphoto2-dev-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc (new) libgphoto2-dev_2.4.10.1-4_i386.deb optional libdevel (new

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Please REJECT (was: Re: libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW)

2011-02-27 Thread David Paleino
Hello, On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: [..] Could someone please REJECT libgphoto2? Some issues have been found in the package, and I don't want them to be spread in the archive. I'll upload a new revision soon. Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian developer |

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

2011-02-27 Thread David Paleino
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:28:03 +0100, David Paleino wrote: On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: (new) libgphoto2-dev-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc (new) libgphoto2-dev_2.4.10.1-4_i386.deb optional libdevel (new) libgphoto2-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] libgphoto2_2.4.10.1-4_i386.changes is NEW

2011-02-27 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:19:16 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote: [...] For the upcoming -5, I re-merged libgphoto2-doc into libgphoto2-2, and split out localized messages into a libgphoto2-l10n, recommended by libgphoto2-2. I haven't uploaded this yet

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#620937: libgphoto2-2: udev rule not installed

2011-04-05 Thread David Paleino
retitle 620937 README.Debian is out-of-date regarding udev rules severity 620397 minor thanks Hello, On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:13:28 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: The libgphoto2 Debian README [0] says: This version of libgphoto2-installs udev files in /etc/udev/libgphoto2.rules to

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#620941: libgphoto2-2: permissions not set correctly on USB devices

2011-04-05 Thread David Paleino
tags 620941 confirmed thanks Hello again, On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:20:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: It seems that the permissions on my camera's USB device is not being set correctly. When trying to access the camera I get the following error: servo:~ 0$ gphoto2 -L

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#622569: still ships rules files in /etc/udev/

2011-04-13 Thread David Paleino
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 03:21:05 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: Package: libgphoto2-2 Version: 2.4.10.1-5 Severity: important Please move all rules files to /lib/udev/rules.d/ . Rules files in /etc/udev/ are especially bad because they are not re-read by udev on upgrades. I can't see /etc/ here?

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#625872: libgphoto2-2: camera not auto mounted by gvfs gphoto2 backend, manually mounting gphoto2://[usb:id] works

2011-05-08 Thread David Paleino
On Fri, 06 May 2011 15:45:14 +0200, MG wrote: Package: libgphoto2-2 Version: 2.4.10.1-5 Severity: normal Seems to be the same problem than archived bug 564540 : Which was merged with #531978 :) when I plug in my camera (Nikon D60), gthumb does not launch as usual, I can't import my

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] critical 2GB bug in debian packages of gphoto2, but fixed in latest revisions

2011-08-24 Thread David Paleino
), and it was released in mid-April. Do you mean that by long ago? :) Furthermore, I ask you to file a proper bug using reportbug gphoto2, or by reading http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting . That way we/I can properly track the bug in our BTS, and record everything there. Thank you, David Paleino

[Pkg-phototools-devel] RFA: gphoto2 -- The gphoto2 digital camera command-line client

2013-06-10 Thread David Paleino
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the gphoto2 package. The package is currently maintained by the Debian PhotoTools Team, CCed. The package description is: The gphoto2 library can be used by applications to access various digital camera models, via standard protocols such

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#714441: libgphoto2: please switch to libusb-1.0

2013-07-17 Thread David Paleino
2013/7/17 Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de Hi David and Debian PhotoTools maintainers, [..] I have seen you request an adopter for libgphoto2. Do you mind if we make a minimal upload of libgphoto2 after the libgd2 transition is over? This will fix #714441 and #715163. I'm ok with that.