[Pkg-phototools-devel] Accepted checkit-tiff 0.2.3-2 (source) into unstable

vel@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> Description: checkit-tiff - conformance checker for baseline TIFFs Closes: 854769 Changes: checkit-tiff (0.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload. * Add missing copyright Closes: #854769 * Standards-Ve

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Another "empty" repository: packjpg (Was: feh repository)

Hi Andreas, somehow you managed to fix the feh repository. I've just imported packjpg from Alioth[1] but salsa claims for https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/packjpg The repository for this project is empty However, if I do gbp clone

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Accepted feh 2.23.2-1 (source) into unstable

hanged-By: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> Description: feh- imlib2 based image viewer Changes: feh (2.23.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream version * cme fix dpkg-control * Use yudit.ttf from yudit-common package * Use secure URI in d/watch Ch

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] feh repository (Was: salsa?)

Hi Andreas, On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:55:19PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > a) add Laszlo Boszormenyi > > Hello, > According to the web-interfave there seems to be a difference between > project (feh) and group (debian-phototools-team) members. Looks like > masters can

[Pkg-phototools-devel] feh repository (Was: salsa?)

Hi, On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 02:19:30PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > I would suggest > [1] Request/get "phototools-team" group > [2] Set some admins > [3] Add users to project Thanks. Since I'm a bit involved in feh maintenance could you please a) add Laszlo Boszormenyi

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Wheezy update of pngquant?

Hi Emilio, On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 09:42:37AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > No worries. I already updated pngquant in wheezy. Cool. Thanks a lot. > I also found another possible > buffer overflow and reported it upstream, but it's not confirmed yet (and I > don't have a test case

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Please check packaging of new package checkit_tiff

Hi, On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 08:27:17PM +0100, Andreas Romeyke wrote: > I uploaded a new upstream for checkit-tiff (v0.2.2), please could you > check my changes and help me to fix open debian-related issues? > > If there any problems it would be fine if I can chat with you via IRC, > because it

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Please check packaging of new package checkit_tiff

Hi Andreas, I did a few commits that were easier done than described here. Please check the log thoroughly to learn how things should be done. On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:52:25PM +0200, Andreas Romeyke wrote: > > > extra-license-file usr/share/checkit_tiff/LICENSE W: checkit-tiff: > > > >

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Please check packaging of new package checkit_tiff

On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 05:07:50PM +0200, Andreas Romeyke wrote: > > > > Please insert the correct upstream tarball using > > > >gbp import-orig --pristine-tar correctly_versioned_orig.tar.gz > > > > The pristine-tar branch contains only information about version 0.0.0 > > (which probably

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Problem using gbp, Please check packaging of new package checkit_tiff

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:11:28PM +0200, Andreas Romeyke wrote: > > I tried this (in fresh cloned git working directory from > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-phototools/checkit-tiff.git/), but > it fails with ff. error: > > --- snip - > $ git clone Better use gbp clone

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Please check packaging of new package checkit_tiff

sion 0.0.0 (which probably but not necessarily should be removed. Once I can build the package I come back to potential issues. Kind regards Andreas. On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:52:25PM +0200, Andreas Romeyke wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 06:57:52 +0200 > Andreas Tille &l

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Please check packaging of new package checkit_tiff

Hi Andreas, On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:18:44PM +0200, Andreas Romeyke wrote: > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-phototools/checkit-tiff.git/ For importing an upstream tar please always use gbp import-orig --pristine-tar which creates a pristine-tar branch. You can re-do this and

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Add exiv2 to Photo Tools list?

Hi Alan, On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 08:47:34AM -0500, Alan Pater wrote: > I recently stumbled on the Debian Photo Tools list: > http://blends.debian.org/multimedia/tasks/photography > > I am curious as to why the exiv2 image metadata library and cli is not > on this list? I (as the person who is

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#821248: ITP: fgallery -- modern, minimalist javascript photo gallery

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> * Package name: fgallery Version : 1.8.1 Upstream Author : "Yuri D’Elia" <wav...@thregr.org> * URL : https://www.thregr.org/~wavexx/software/fgallery/ * License :

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#821247: ITP: facedetect -- simple face detector for batch processing

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org> * Package name: facedetect Version : 0.0.+20150428 Upstream Author : "Yuri D’Elia" <wav...@thregr.org> * URL : https://github.com/wavexx/facedetect * License :

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#742451: Please test new version (2.5.0)

Hi, could you please test the just uploaded version 2.5.0 whether this problem persists? Thanks Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list Pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#777000: ITP: limereg -- Lightweight Image Registration. Commandline application for image registration (automatically aligning two images with similar content).

Hi Roelof, this sounds pretty interesting. Since I see some scientific application I added limereg-dev (assuming that the development library will be named that way) to Debian Science imaging and Debian Med imaging-dev tasks. I wonder whether it might make sense to maintain the package inside

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#773967: Bug#773967: feh crashes on invalid gif image data

Hi, thanks for this bug report. Unfortunately I do not fully understand how to reproduce the problem. You generated the affected test images and it would help if you could put them online somehow to simplify the reproduction (or provide a generation script alternatively). I realised that

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#764428: Bug#764428: pngquant: FTBFS on hppa: Unsupported compiler option

Hi, since the package is team maintained I really don't mind if you push a change and upload the package to fix this problem. If yo do not like this I'll need at least a patch to fix this. Kind regards Andreas. On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:27:47PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: On

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#742451: Bug#742451: pngquant aborts everytime

Hi, unfortunately I can not reproduce this problem: $ convert rose: rose.png $ pngquant 256 rose.png $ LANG=C ls -l rose* -rw-r--r-- 1 tillea admin 3717 Mar 24 16:13 rose-fs8.png -rw-r--r-- 1 tillea admin 7009 Mar 24 16:12 rose.png $ pngquant --version 2.0.1 (September 2013) The resulting image

[Pkg-phototools-devel] [SCM] entangle branch, master, updated. debian/0.4.0-1-5-g993d14b

The following commit has been merged in the master branch: commit 993d14b4c9ea5f9729c67a2de751a837695a5b70 Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Tue Sep 11 08:42:36 2012 +0200 Upload to unstable diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index f75025c..6f570b2 100644

[Pkg-phototools-devel] [SCM] entangle tag, debian/0.4.1-1, created. debian/0.4.0-1-5-g993d14b

The tag, debian/0.4.1-1 has been created at 993d14b4c9ea5f9729c67a2de751a837695a5b70 (commit) - Shortlog commit 993d14b4c9ea5f9729c67a2de751a837695a5b70 Author: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org Date: Tue Sep 11 08:42:36 2012

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Entangle (Was: useful software for medical practice)

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:11:19PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote: Is there anything that can be done to make this happen ? Currently you should help ftpmaster migrating from postgresql 9.0 to 9.1 because this migration is somehow blocking the NEW queue. The migration should be done today so

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#645972: Entangle (Was: useful software for medical practice)

/copyright: --- Files: debian/entangle.1 Copyright: 2012 Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org License: GPL-3+ --- Do you agree? If you insist of making things more complicated than needed do what you like to do. However, I do not feel like adding Copyright + License statements to some single files under

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#645972: Entangle (Was: useful software for medical practice)

Hi Carlo, On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 12:27:50PM +0200, Carlo Stemberger wrote: I'd like to send the man page upstream, so I have 2 questions: That's kind and saves me extra work. 1) I read «This manual page was generated using html2man»; where is the source? It was created using help2man with

[Pkg-phototools-devel] Entangle (Was: useful software for medical practice)

Hi, after doing some finger warming up in the morning and basically duplicating the work inside the pkg-phototools repository[1] (my fault to forget to check WNPP) I noticed that the packaging looks quite ready for upload. Matteo, any reason to use experimental as target distribution. I'd

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Entangle (Was: useful software for medical practice)

Hi David, On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 07:03:10AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: I have been working with Matteo a bit on this, but feel free to take over sponsorship; I have been a bit slow in any case. When last Matteo and I talked, I was waiting for a man page for entangle. Seems I have totally

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] GIT commit permissions without Debian account?

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 07:33:28PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: luminance-hdr's debian/* is kept in pkg-phototools-devel's git. Leonardo is no DD but has gotten alioth login (montex-guest) recently. Afaiui selective write permissions for a single repo are not possible. All teams I know

Re: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#362762: feh: use EXIF headers

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:22:07AM +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote: Indeed that would be very cool, what about forwarding this to the new maintainer of feh? The new upstream maintainer is very active and fixes feh bugs step by step (when I took over feh as maintainer it has about three times more