On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 01:19:58PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Package: libdb-ruby1.8
Version: 0.6.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Causes unclean upgrades
I have dhelp installed on a Lenny system, which depends on
libdb4.2-ruby1.8. After upgrading the system at some point I was left
with
Hi all,
I was just wondering: since our QA report tool [1] supports listing
packages not in the repository yet as work in progress [2], why don't we
remove the packages-wip/ directory from our repository?
This would have IMO the following advantages:
* the WIP packages would appear in the QA
[ I am adding a Cc: to the debian-perl list, as the PET wizards live
there and might have a say on this. Also, because the pkg-perl group
has some packages which could be moved into a packages-wip
directory, cleaning up our main stats? ]
This thread starts at [1].
Antonio Terceiro dijo
