Index: debian/patches/doc-in-a-single-dir.patch
===
--- debian/patches/doc-in-a-single-dir.patch(revision 0)
+++ debian/patches/doc-in-a-single-dir.patch(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+diff -Nur -x '*.orig' -x '*~'
On 09/12/08 at 11:19 -0500, Richard Hurt wrote:
- Is there any thought around moving to Git?
I use git for other things, but we haven't reached any of subversion's
limits in pkg-ruby-extras. Note that we maintain a lot of simple
packages, not a few complex packages (where git would be more
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 06:46:08PM +0100]:
No, please upload as a maintainer upload. You are part of the team,
there's no reason why this should be an NMU.
Also, with my initial packager hat, I don't have anything against you
uploading directly to unstable.
Well... We
libdb-ruby_0.6.5-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdb-ruby_0.6.5-3.dsc
libdb-ruby_0.6.5-3.diff.gz
libdb4.2-ruby1.8_0.6.5-3_all.deb
libdb4.3-ruby1.8_0.6.5-3_all.deb
libdb4.4-ruby1.8_0.6.5-3_all.deb
libdb4.2-ruby1.9_0.6.5-3_all.deb
Your message dated Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:47:08 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#501370: fixed in libdb-ruby 0.6.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #501370,
regarding [libdb-ruby1.9] most of the documentation missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
