[DRE-maint] Accepted libhaml-ruby 2.2.14-1 (source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:39:00 -0600 Source: libhaml-ruby Binary: libhaml-ruby1.8 libhaml-ruby libhaml-ruby-doc haml-elisp Architecture: source all Version: 2.2.14-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Gunnar Wolf

[DRE-maint] Accepted libprawn-ruby 0.6.3+dfsg-1 (source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:06:18 -0600 Source: libprawn-ruby Binary: libprawn-ruby1.8 libprawn-ruby1.9 libprawn-ruby libprawn-ruby-common Architecture: source all Version: 0.6.3+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:

[DRE-maint] Accepted mongrel-cluster 1.0.5-3 (source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:38:15 -0600 Source: mongrel-cluster Binary: mongrel-cluster Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jeremy Lainé jeremy.la...@m4x.org Changed-By: Gunnar Wolf

[DRE-maint] mongrel-cluster override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): mongrel-cluster_1.0.5-3_all.deb: package says section is web, override says httpd. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug,

[DRE-maint] Bug#542457: marked as done (libprawn-ruby-common: long description no sentence)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:30:54 + with message-id e1ndf9c-0004la...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#542457: fixed in libprawn-ruby 0.6.3+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #542457, regarding libprawn-ruby-common: long description no sentence to be marked as done. This

[DRE-maint] Bug#557190: marked as done ([haml-elisp] should depend on ruby-elisp)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:30:33 + with message-id e1ndf8r-0004ak...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#557190: fixed in libhaml-ruby 2.2.14-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #557190, regarding [haml-elisp] should depend on ruby-elisp to be marked as done. This means that you

[DRE-maint] Bug#550539: marked as done (mongrel-cluster: Incorrect init.d script dependencies and runlevels)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:35:05 + with message-id e1ndfdf-00068b...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#550539: fixed in mongrel-cluster 1.0.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #550539, regarding mongrel-cluster: Incorrect init.d script dependencies and runlevels to be marked as

[DRE-maint] Bug#557023: Barby::Code128: private method split called for nil

tags 557023 = pending thanks Hmm... Looking more closely to your submitted patches: The second part makes sense (using an empty string when a nil is presented), although its correctness might be stylistic (i.e. some authors prefer to raise an exception on an anomalous condition, which you can

[DRE-maint] Processed: Re: Barby::Code128: private method split called for nil

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 557023 = pending Bug #557023 [libbarby-ruby1.8] Barby::Code128: private method split called for nil Removed tag(s) upstream and patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

[DRE-maint] Processed: grr, too trigger-happy!

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 557023 = upstream, patch Bug #557023 [libbarby-ruby1.8] Barby::Code128: private method split called for nil Added tag(s) upstream and patch; removed tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.