Joseph Herlant wrote...
> To achieve your goal you would need to use the following:
> mailto:debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de[Christoph Biedl]
(...)
> Is that acceptable?
Certainly.
Christoph, should actually be able to read documentation on his own
signature.asc
Description: PGP
ugreport was written for the Debian project by Christoph Biedl
<debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de> but may be used by others (although
there should be no need for this).
EXPECTED
This manpage was written for the Debian project by Christoph Biedl
<debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de> but
Package: asciidoctor
Version: 1.5.5-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
ASCIIPATIENT(1)
===
NAME
asciipatient - In the manpage backend, URLs are wrapped by default
DESCRIPTION
---
Different from the output created by asciidoc, embedded URLs are
happily wrapped
Package: asciidoctor
Version: 1.5.5-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
ASCIIPATIENT(1)
===
NAME
asciipatient - In the manpage backend, URLs change alignment
DESCRIPTION
---
The *roff output created by the "manpage" backend contains a ".ad l" at
the very beginning,
forwarded 882308 https://github.com/igrigorik/em-http-request/issues/316
thanks
Jérémy Lal wrote...
> Control: reassign -1 ruby-em-http-request
> I took the liberty to reassign it to it. Feel free to reassign to
> whichever you see it would be better assigned.
Good question where to put it, you
Jérémy Lal wrote...
> Control: reassign -1 ruby-http-parser.rb
Thanks for taking care of that one. However ...
> it seems ruby-em-http-request uses a fork of http_parser.rb that has not
> been updated for a while. However, upstream seems to have fixed some
> issues with more recents http-parser
tags 881627 patch
thanks
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> Would you mind disabling or relaxing the test on your side for
> the time being?
Patch attached, tested successfully.
As I noticed some packaging work has been done since the last release,
so I'm somewhat reluctant to do a NMU. But
Source: ruby-http-parser.rb
Version: 0.6.0-3+b3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
your package build-depends on http-parser, and a new version of that
one has been around for a while. Even before eventually uploading last
night I already saw a problem in the test suite of your
Control: tags 861040 + patch
Control: tags 861040 + pending
Chris Lamb wrote...
> Christoph Biedl wrote:
>
> > So would just naming the link Lato-RegularItalic.ttf [..]
> > fix the issue?
>
> Works for me :) Updated patch attached.
Thanks for testing, here we go:
Christian Hofstaedtler wrote...
> * Chris Lamb [170424 11:45]:
> > > The fonts-lato ships /usr/share/fonts/truetype/lato/Lato-Italic.ttf
> > > instead.
> >
> > Indeed. Patch attached.
>
> > - ln -s /usr/share/fonts/truetype/lato/Lato-RegularItalic.ttf
> >
10 matches
Mail list logo