Re: [DRE-maint] Bug#534721: Patch

2010-09-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 16:28:12 +0100, something...@sodium.serveirc.com wrote: So it turns out the main bug does not affect amd64 (or more generally, roughly systems where (LONG_MAX2) = INT_MAX). There are at least two bugs in the tag comparison: - Assumes number equality is the same as

[DRE-maint] [Bug 632900] [NEW] Sync librspec-ruby 1.3.0-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-09-08 Thread Bhavani Shankar
Public bug reported: Please sync librspec-ruby 1.3.0-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) as it fixes tests failures during build Changelog entries since current maverick version 1.3.0-2: librspec-ruby (1.3.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * Added support for Ruby 1.9.2 which introduced some

[DRE-maint] [Bug 632902] [NEW] Sync libsexp-processor-ruby 3.0.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-09-08 Thread Bhavani Shankar
Public bug reported: Please sync libsexp-processor-ruby 3.0.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) as it fixes tests failure problem during build Changelog entries since current maverick version 3.0.4-1: libsexp-processor-ruby (3.0.4-2) unstable; urgency=low * Load tests with absolute

[DRE-maint] [Bug 632900] Re: Sync librspec-ruby 1.3.0-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-09-08 Thread Alessio Treglia
** Changed in: librspec-ruby (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: librspec-ruby (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- Sync librspec-ruby 1.3.0-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632900 You received this bug notification

[DRE-maint] [Bug 632900] Re: Sync librspec-ruby 1.3.0-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-09-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package librspec-ruby - 1.3.0-3 --- librspec-ruby (1.3.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * Added support for Ruby 1.9.2 which introduced some breaking changes like no '.' in the LOAD_PATH or requiring to pass blocks with a parameter to instance_eval

[DRE-maint] Bug#534721: Bug#534721: Patch

2010-09-08 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Julien Cristau dijo [Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 10:51:26AM +0200]: On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 16:28:12 +0100, something...@sodium.serveirc.com wrote: So it turns out the main bug does not affect amd64 (or more generally, roughly systems where (LONG_MAX2) = INT_MAX). There are at least two