Hi,
I just decided to nofity all the participants here, in case
this new info might be interesting or useful :)
___
Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:08:52AM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote:
Package: init-system-helpers
Version: 1.22
init-system-helpers 1.22 introduced a versioned Depends: on
perl-base. This needlessly complicates upgrades and backports by
forcing perl and its reverse dependencies to be upgraded
Package: systemd
Version: 215-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
I am not providing the additional information that reportbug wants to provide
because if I do, the mail will be rejected as spam by bogus filters.
Dear Maintainer,
somehow, after the
Package: systemd
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have a current sid system which has been updated to current sid from
May's sid in a big update run and has gotten systemd in the process.
Unfortunately, it dies when X is started.
To debug this issue, I'd like to have a possibility to stop X from
being
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 771172 new services are not automatically picked up without explicit
systemctl daemon-reload
Bug #771172 [systemd] systemd-sysv-generator does not generate
Changed Bug title to 'new services are not automatically picked up without
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 771172 wishlist
Bug #771172 [systemd] new services are not automatically picked up without
explicit systemctl daemon-reload
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'critical'
tags 771172 + wontfix
Bug #771172 [systemd] new services are not
Am 27.11.2014 um 12:01 schrieb Salvo Tomaselli:
Package: systemd
Version: 215-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
I am not providing the additional information that reportbug wants to provide
because if I do, the mail will be rejected as spam by
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 systemd
Bug #761306 [systemd] v208 - v215 upgrade fails to re-open notification socket
Ignoring request to reassign bug #761306 to the same package
forcemerge -1 761306
Bug #761306 [systemd] v208 - v215 upgrade fails to re-open notification socket
Merged
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 systemd
Bug #771101 [udev] wheezy - jessie dist-upgrade failure when systemd is the
active PID1
Bug reassigned from package 'udev' to 'systemd'.
No longer marked as found in versions systemd/215-6.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #771101
control: reassign -1 systemd
control: forcemerge -1 761306
Am 27.11.2014 um 02:49 schrieb Michael Biebl:
control: forcemerge -1 761306
Am 26.11.2014 um 23:06 schrieb Michael Biebl:
I think, that's the relevant part from the journal, specifically:
Nov 26 19:36:57 debian systemd[1]:
Package: systemd
Version: 215-6
Severity: important
During a dist-upgrade from wheezy to jessie, where systemd (v44) is the
active PID 1, I noticed the following error message in systemd.postinst:
+ [ configure = triggered ]
+ dpkg --compare-versions 44-11+deb7u4 lt 214-1
+ systemctl enable
Am 27.11.2014 um 15:59 schrieb Michael Biebl:
I would have expected, that the socket does *not* exist before systemd
is re-execd, but apparently I had a file there:
srw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 Oct 10 10:41 /run/systemd/notify
and no process listening on it.
(don't worry about the date, it
Am 27.11.2014 um 16:41 schrieb Michael Biebl:
It's actually a bit simpler: v44 *did* already use /run/systemd/notify
(with permissions srw-rw-rw-), then it was changed to use an abstract
namespace and it was changed back and forth a couple of times.
Maybe a simple chmod will do when upgrading
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #757367 (http://bugs.debian.org/757367)
# Bug title: udev:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
FYI: The status of the init-system-helpers source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.21
Current version: 1.22
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
Am 27.11.2014 um 16:41 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 27.11.2014 um 15:59 schrieb Michael Biebl:
I would have expected, that the socket does *not* exist before systemd
is re-execd, but apparently I had a file there:
srw-rw-rw- 1 root root 0 Oct 10 10:41 /run/systemd/notify
and no process
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:26:04AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:08:52AM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote:
Package: init-system-helpers
Version: 1.22
init-system-helpers 1.22 introduced a versioned Depends: on
perl-base. This needlessly complicates upgrades and
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On 2014-11-26 16:15, Martin Pitt wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
systemd 215-6 made it into testing today, so I'd like to ask for
landing another set of small fixes.
In data giovedì 27 novembre 2014 15:40:01, Michael Biebl ha scritto:
Am 27.11.2014 um 12:01 schrieb Salvo Tomaselli:
Package: systemd
Version: 215-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
I am not providing the additional information that
Am 23.11.2014 um 00:35 schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 20:01 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Attached is a patch against /etc/init.d/networking.
While we discussed yesterday, to only run udevadm settle if there are
any auto interfaces, I changed it, to also cover
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 09:06:11PM +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Running systemctl daemon-reload is sufficient to run the generator.
You don't need to run it by hand and copying the files around.
I wasn't even aware there was such a thing. rantI thought systemd was
supposed to be a drop in
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:17:59 +0100 Szymon Weihs szyn...@gmail.com wrote:
When I'm doing reboot or shutdown from graphical environment (systemctl
reboot/poweroff), my screen turns off immediately so I can't see any messages
provided with option systemd.show_status=true.
If I shutdown my
Hello,
I have found that adding
ExecStop=/bin/chvt 1
ExecStop=/sbin/start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --pidfile
/var/run/lightdm.pid --name lightdm --retry 5
to the [Service] section in /etc/systemd/system/lightdm.service fixes
the problem. Shutdown and reboot work properly.
Best,
-Nikolaus
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 771122 215-5
Bug #771122 [systemd] restarting the journal breaks other services
Marked as found in versions systemd/215-5.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
771122:
Am 28.11.2014 um 06:10 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 27.11.2014 um 13:39 schrieb Marc Haber:
Package: systemd
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have a current sid system which has been updated to current sid from
May's sid in a big update run and has gotten systemd in the process.
Unfortunately, it
systemd_215-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
systemd_215-7.dsc
systemd_215-7.debian.tar.xz
systemd_215-7_amd64.deb
systemd-sysv_215-7_amd64.deb
libpam-systemd_215-7_amd64.deb
libsystemd0_215-7_amd64.deb
libsystemd-dev_215-7_amd64.deb
Your message dated Fri, 28 Nov 2014 06:05:04 +
with message-id e1xuefw-0008qq...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#674755: fixed in systemd 215-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #674755,
regarding systemd: tmpfs inconsistencies (/run/lock, /run/shm, /tmp)
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Fri, 28 Nov 2014 06:05:04 +
with message-id e1xuefw-0008qu...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#769734: fixed in systemd 215-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #769734,
regarding systemd ignores swap discard option from /etc/fstab
to be marked as done.
This means that
29 matches
Mail list logo
