Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 787758 important
Bug #787758 [systemd] 'Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning' when using
ReadOnlyDirectories in multi-instance service file
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Dear Maintainer,
I have converted my ext3 filesystem to ext4 to reduce time needed by fsck.
But the behaviour is still unchanged, fsck of big partition fails.
--
Axel Ludszuweit
In der Horst 28E
D-30900 Wedemark
Telefon: +49 (0) 5130 373093
Mobil: +49 (0) 170 2736589
Control: fixed -1 220-1
Am 15.11.2015 um 04:31 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 28.10.2015 um 01:02 schrieb Teddy Hogeborn:
>> tags 787758 +patch +fixed-upstream
>> stop
>>
>> I think this is an instance of Red Hat Bug #1184016, here:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184016
>>
>> A
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 220-1
Bug #787758 [systemd] 'Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning' when using
ReadOnlyDirectories in multi-instance service file
Marked as fixed in versions systemd/220-1.
--
787758: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787758
Debian Bug
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 at 20:45:35 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> The systemd maintainers wondered whether this might be
> https://bugs.debian.org/801354 which had similar symptoms.
https://bugs.debian.org/794723 is another possibility. I haven't seen
any other reports of this behaviour, so I'm
Control: tags -1 upstream confirmed
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1902
Control: found -1 227-3
On 15 November 2015 at 03:32, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> thanks for your bug report.
>
> Am 15.11.2015 um 06:02 schrieb Ron:
>
>> On a normal
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 upstream confirmed
Bug #805133 [systemd] systemd disables swap too early during shutdown
Added tag(s) confirmed and upstream.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1902
Bug #805133 [systemd] systemd disables swap too early during shutdown
Thanks for the report!
On 14 November 2015 at 16:39, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Another topic I raised during the talk, was the constant growth of the
> systemd project and how to keep the footprint down for minimal
> installations by splitting up the package.
> I suggested that