Control: tags -1 confirmed upstream patch pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3339
On 6 July 2016 at 09:35, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Package: systemd-container
> Version: 230-5
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> *** Reporter,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed upstream patch pending
Bug #830144 [systemd-container] systemd-container: machinectl segfaults trying
to enable a new container
Added tag(s) upstream, confirmed, pending, and patch.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3339
Bug
Package: systemd-container
Version: 230-5
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I created a new chroot at /var/lib/machines called localrepo using my
home grown script ยน
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:55:19AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Marc Haber [2016-07-06 11:52 +0200]:
> > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:49:17AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > This looks the same for 229, 230/upstream and 230/sid (with the
> > > reverted patch). Thus I cannot confirm that networkd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 815793 + unreproducible
Bug #815793 [systemd] IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
815793:
Hello Marc,
Marc Haber [2016-07-06 11:52 +0200]:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:49:17AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > This looks the same for 229, 230/upstream and 230/sid (with the
> > reverted patch). Thus I cannot confirm that networkd ignores these
> > unsolicited router advertisements.
>
>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:49:17AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> This looks the same for 229, 230/upstream and 230/sid (with the
> reverted patch). Thus I cannot confirm that networkd ignores these
> unsolicited router advertisements.
Can you, just for reference, try with systemd 229-1, just to see
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 10:50:53AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> So please: Can you install the packages on
> https://people.debian.org/~mpitt/tmp/systemd-userspace-ndisc/ and
> check if you still get the bad behaviour with those? If so, can you
> please run networkd in debug mode and a parallel
Hello Marc,
Marc Haber [2016-07-06 9:42 +0200]:
> I think this particular issue can be triggered by:
>
> - set up a router running radvd
> - start up a client with networkd and systemd IPv6 implementation
> - manually remove any IPv6 address and IPv6 route from the client
> - restart the radvd
Control: reopen -1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible
while we reverted the change in 229, we don't want to carry the reversion
forever. I forwarded this upstream to
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3664, and will now play relay :-)
I reopen the bug as we should investigate/fix
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #815884 {Done: Martin Pitt } [systemd] does not retry
IPv6 router solicitations
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Marc Haber [2016-07-06 9:03 +0200]:
> > > Do you have some instructions how this can be reproduced? It sounds
> > > like it should be possible to test this using a veth pair, possibly a
> > > dnsmasq on one end, and some ip commands.
Hey Marc,
Marc Haber [2016-07-06 9:03 +0200]:
> > Do you have some instructions how this can be reproduced? It sounds
> > like it should be possible to test this using a veth pair, possibly a
> > dnsmasq on one end, and some ip commands. Then I'd like to write a
> > test case for [2].
> >
> >
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 08:57:43AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> while we reverted the change in 229, we don't want to carry the
> reversion forever. Also, some problems were fixed already in 230, like
> [1]. I forwarded this upstream to
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3663,
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #815793 {Done: Martin Pitt } [systemd] IPv6 code ignores
unsolicited router advertisements
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Control: reopen -1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hello Marc,
while we reverted the change in 229, we don't want to carry the
reversion forever. Also, some problems were fixed already in 230, like
[1]. I forwarded this upstream to
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3663, and will now play
relay
16 matches
Mail list logo