Bug#830144: systemd-container: machinectl segfaults trying to enable a new container

2016-07-06 Thread Felipe Sateler
Control: tags -1 confirmed upstream patch pending Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3339 On 6 July 2016 at 09:35, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > Package: systemd-container > Version: 230-5 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > *** Reporter,

Processed: Re: Bug#830144: systemd-container: machinectl segfaults trying to enable a new container

2016-07-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed upstream patch pending Bug #830144 [systemd-container] systemd-container: machinectl segfaults trying to enable a new container Added tag(s) upstream, confirmed, pending, and patch. > forwarded -1 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3339 Bug

Bug#830144: systemd-container: machinectl segfaults trying to enable a new container

2016-07-06 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: systemd-container Version: 230-5 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? I created a new chroot at /var/lib/machines called localrepo using my home grown script ยน

Bug#815793: IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements

2016-07-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:55:19AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Marc Haber [2016-07-06 11:52 +0200]: > > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:49:17AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > > This looks the same for 229, 230/upstream and 230/sid (with the > > > reverted patch). Thus I cannot confirm that networkd

Processed: tagging 815793

2016-07-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 815793 + unreproducible Bug #815793 [systemd] IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements Added tag(s) unreproducible. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 815793:

Bug#815793: IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements

2016-07-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Marc, Marc Haber [2016-07-06 11:52 +0200]: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:49:17AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > This looks the same for 229, 230/upstream and 230/sid (with the > > reverted patch). Thus I cannot confirm that networkd ignores these > > unsolicited router advertisements. > >

Bug#815793: IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements

2016-07-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:49:17AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > This looks the same for 229, 230/upstream and 230/sid (with the > reverted patch). Thus I cannot confirm that networkd ignores these > unsolicited router advertisements. Can you, just for reference, try with systemd 229-1, just to see

Bug#815884: does not retry IPv6 router solicitations

2016-07-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 10:50:53AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > So please: Can you install the packages on > https://people.debian.org/~mpitt/tmp/systemd-userspace-ndisc/ and > check if you still get the bad behaviour with those? If so, can you > please run networkd in debug mode and a parallel

Bug#815793: IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements

2016-07-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Marc, Marc Haber [2016-07-06 9:42 +0200]: > I think this particular issue can be triggered by: > > - set up a router running radvd > - start up a client with networkd and systemd IPv6 implementation > - manually remove any IPv6 address and IPv6 route from the client > - restart the radvd

Bug#815884: does not retry IPv6 router solicitations

2016-07-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: reopen -1 Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible while we reverted the change in 229, we don't want to carry the reversion forever. I forwarded this upstream to https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3664, and will now play relay :-) I reopen the bug as we should investigate/fix

Processed: Re: Bug#815884: does not retry IPv6 router solicitations

2016-07-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #815884 {Done: Martin Pitt } [systemd] does not retry IPv6 router solicitations 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug

Bug#815793: IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements

2016-07-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Marc Haber [2016-07-06 9:03 +0200]: > > > Do you have some instructions how this can be reproduced? It sounds > > > like it should be possible to test this using a veth pair, possibly a > > > dnsmasq on one end, and some ip commands.

Bug#815793: IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements

2016-07-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Hey Marc, Marc Haber [2016-07-06 9:03 +0200]: > > Do you have some instructions how this can be reproduced? It sounds > > like it should be possible to test this using a veth pair, possibly a > > dnsmasq on one end, and some ip commands. Then I'd like to write a > > test case for [2]. > > > >

Bug#815793: IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements

2016-07-06 Thread Marc Haber
Hi Martin, On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 08:57:43AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > while we reverted the change in 229, we don't want to carry the > reversion forever. Also, some problems were fixed already in 230, like > [1]. I forwarded this upstream to > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3663,

Processed: Re: Bug#815793: IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements

2016-07-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #815793 {Done: Martin Pitt } [systemd] IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.

Bug#815793: IPv6 code ignores unsolicited router advertisements

2016-07-06 Thread Martin Pitt
Control: reopen -1 Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hello Marc, while we reverted the change in 229, we don't want to carry the reversion forever. Also, some problems were fixed already in 230, like [1]. I forwarded this upstream to https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3663, and will now play relay