Re: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#826215: Bug #826214: Bug #826215: init-d-script and systemd: solution

2016-12-29 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Maintainer scripts (postinst, postrm, etc) in packages are to always use invoke-rc.d, exceptions are almost always a package bug. Even when using systemd. The naming is unfortunate, yes. But users and admins are to use service, and never invoke-rc.d. And the systemd glue in invoke-rc.d is

Re: Bug #826214: Bug #826215: init-d-script and systemd: solution

2016-12-29 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Martin Pitt] > "service", not invoke-rc.d, but I do agree that it would be better to > completely drop that magic. This would be a nice way to gradually teach people > about the init system neutral APIs, and also find/fix places which hardcode > calling /etc/init.d/. Will service respect

Bug#849316: machinctl: fails to list anything if a libvirt qemu container is running

2016-12-29 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 26 December 2016 at 06:18, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Am 25.12.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Felipe Sateler: > > PR 4978 was closed in favor of 4972. However, it has not been merged > > yet. The patch is small so at least I don't have a problem with > > backporting. However, we prefer

Processed: [bts-link] source package systemd

2016-12-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to

[bts-link] source package systemd

2016-12-29 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #849316 (http://bugs.debian.org/849316) # Bug title: machinctl: fails to list

Re: Bug #826214: Bug #826215: init-d-script and systemd: solution

2016-12-29 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/29/2016 01:59 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Martin Pitt] >> "service", not invoke-rc.d, but I do agree that it would be better to >> completely drop that magic. This would be a nice way to gradually teach >> people >> about the init system neutral APIs, and also find/fix places which

Re: Bug #826214: Bug #826215: init-d-script and systemd: solution

2016-12-29 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi Andreas, Sorry for not replying earlier, but I wanted to mull this over some before answering. On 12/27/2016 10:49 AM, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 01:34:41PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: >> Hi there, >> (Cc'd a lot of people, so that hopefully everybody relevant >>

Re: Bug #826214: Bug #826215: init-d-script and systemd: solution

2016-12-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Andreas, all, Andreas Henriksson [2016-12-27 10:49 +0100]: > At the same time for Buster it might be time to let go of this. Just > leave init-d-script broken in this regard (and hopefully find someone > willing to maintain it and handle its other issues). But in that case > I also think

Bug#849637: /sys/devices/system/cpu/online SELinux context

2016-12-29 Thread cgzones
Package: systemd Version: 232-8 When running a SELinux enabled system /sys/devices/system/cpu/online is mislabeled after boot: root@test1:/root/selinux/policy# restorecon -vv -R -F -n /sys Would relabel /sys/devices/system/cpu/online from system_u:object_r:sysfs_t:s0 to