Bug#822635: udev rules for USB device access effective at boot, but not on hotplug

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:17:11PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:10:58 +0100 Michael Biebl > wrote: > > Hi Josh! > > > > On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:15:12 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 May 2016 18:12:27 -0500 Martin Pitt

Bug#875557: Info received (Bug#875557: systemd: service mark as enabled but not in reality)

hm, the email address bounces here: > >The mail system > > : host mx.cblue.be[193.104.37.23] said: 550 Unrouteable > address (in reply to RCPT TO command) > > > > Reporting-MTA: dns; dd17218.kasserver.com > X-Postfix-Queue-ID: A90216801856 >

Bug#831414: marked as done (systemd: learns IPv6 prefix from its own RAs and configures IP address on wrong interface)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:24:02 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#831414: systemd: learns IPv6 prefix from its own RAs and configures IP address on wrong interface has caused the Debian Bug report #831414, regarding

Bug#875557: systemd: service mark as enabled but not in reality

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:08:49 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 12.09.2017 um 09:45 schrieb sthiry: > > Package: systemd > > Version: 232-25+deb9u1 > > Severity: normal > > > > Hello, > > > > I use multiple php-fpm process to run apache websites and I

Processed: bug 868159 is forwarded to https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8566

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 868159 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8566 Bug #868159 [systemd] systemd-setup-tmpfiles startup error when /srv is on read-only fs Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8566'. > thanks

Processed: Re: Bug#875557: systemd: service mark as enabled but not in reality

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #875557 [systemd] systemd: service mark as enabled but not in reality Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 875557: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875557 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#863710: marked as done (journald's most recent entries)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:03:19 +0100 with message-id <917a9097-0c17-577d-d435-f4154b9fc...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#863710: journald's most recent entries has caused the Debian Bug report #863710, regarding journald's most recent entries to be marked as done. This means

Bug#803524: journalctl too slow

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 01:46:59 +0100 Christoph Egger wrote: > Package: systemd > Version: 215-17+deb8u2 > Severity: normal > File: /bin/journalctl > > Hi! > > `journalctl -u nsd.service` just takes 10 minutes (!) cpu time to > scrol to the newest

Processed: Re: journalctl too slow

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #803524 [systemd] journalctl too slow Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 803524: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803524 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#892585: systemd: can not create user.slice/user session, after upgrade systemd from 237-4 to 238-1/2

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:16:40 +0800 johnw wrote: > After upgrade systemd to 238-3, I still have this problem :( > Any one? > Help, please. Does it work if you switch to a different display manager, like say lightdm (which IIRC is the preferred one of xfce). Might be a

Bug#893605: warning: #warning "Consider adding the right mmap() syscall definitions here!" [-Wcpp]

On 23/03/18 14:25, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi James, > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:19 PM, James Cowgill wrote: >> Control: notforwarded -1 >> >> Hi, >> >> On 22/03/18 14:28, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Am 22.03.2018 um 12:31 schrieb James Cowgill: I sent a patch

Bug#893605: warning: #warning "Consider adding the right mmap() syscall definitions here!" [-Wcpp]

Hi James, On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:19 PM, James Cowgill wrote: > Control: notforwarded -1 > > Hi, > > On 22/03/18 14:28, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 22.03.2018 um 12:31 schrieb James Cowgill: >>> I sent a patch upstream (see above). >> >> Thanks! > > Unfortunately I've had

Processed: Re: Bug#893605: warning: #warning "Consider adding the right mmap() syscall definitions here!" [-Wcpp]

Processing control commands: > notforwarded -1 Bug #893605 [src:systemd] warning: #warning "Consider adding the right mmap() syscall definitions here!" [-Wcpp] Unset Bug forwarded-to-address -- 893605: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893605 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#893605: warning: #warning "Consider adding the right mmap() syscall definitions here!" [-Wcpp]

Control: notforwarded -1 Hi, On 22/03/18 14:28, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 22.03.2018 um 12:31 schrieb James Cowgill: >> I sent a patch upstream (see above). > > Thanks! Unfortunately I've had to ask for this to be reverted: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/8563 It turns out that

Processed: Bug #892794 in systemd marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #892794 [systemd] systemd-networkd fails to configure IPv6 without MTU from RA Bug #892651 [systemd] networkd: no IPv6 default route after point release Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. -- 892651:

Bug#893866: stretch-pu: package systemd/232-25+deb9u3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, we already briefly discussed this via IRC on #debian-release. The last stable upload of systemd introduced a rather nasty regression in networkd, which broke IPv6 support for

Bug#883569: libpam-systemd: Prefer systemd-sysv over systemd-shim

Hello Michael, Michael Biebl [2018-03-19 6:44 +0100]: > So, what are we going to do now then? "Nothing" I supppose. I don't think it's actually broken right now, it just feels a little odd to prefer SysV in the dependencies. But with systemd being installed by default, I suppose it's okay.