Bug#761658: urgency of a fix before stretch

also sprach Norbert Preining <norb...@preining.info> [2017-06-03 00:12 +0200]: > Then how are you planning to deal with this serious bug after > years of inactivity? Sounds like it might need ctte attention. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :

Bug#825394: systemd kill background processes after user logs out

quot; This is not, by any > stretch, a technical argument. This is just being against change > for the sake of it being a change. Wrong conclusion. If you don't understand the value of being able to consider more than just the technical side, then maybe Debian isn't the right project for you.

Bug#825394: systemd kill background processes after user logs out

s when I leave the shell session: http://git.madduck.net/v/etc/zsh.git/blob/HEAD:/.zsh/zshrc/99_TODO#l31 Please do not assume that everything is as simple as how you're portraying it to be. Linux is a very very very diverse ecosystem and it grew to be such as a function of the principle of

Bug#786443: inhibit while a PID is running

systemd-inhibit to start the > command seems like the correct way. To do this, I'd have to tell my backup server about all the machines that use systemd, i.e. another place to track this information that is inherently implicit in the systems. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @m

Bug#808997: Missing /usr path in modules-load.d(5)

Package: systemd Version: 228-2 Severity: minor File: /lib/systemd/systemd-modules-load Tags: upstream systemd-modules-load also loads modules specified in /usr/lib/modules-load.d, but this isn't documented in the manpage. This is probably due to th split-usr approach. -- .''`. martin f

Bug#808997: Missing /usr path in modules-load.d(5)

-load.d so that we the Debian systemd maintainers are more flexible with respect to necessary changes. Otherwise, this remains a source of confusion for everyone using split-usr. Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'`

Bug#808997: Processed: Re: Missing /usr path in modules-load.d(5)

y we want to converge with upstream. For this to happen, packages will need to stop using /usr/lib/modules-load.d and as there is no real problem with using /lib/modules-load.d, I filed this bug report. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian develope

Bug#798473: Please let non-root users ask for passwords

-- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.n

Bug#798473: Please let non-root users ask for passwords

also sprach Michael Biebl [2015-09-09 21:09 +0200]: > Can you post a minimal test case? Sorry, this was with jessie (215-17+deb8u2), I have not tried this with sid. # sudo -u backuppc env SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/run/backuppc/ssh-agent.sock DISPLAY=:0

Bug#793374: [PATCH] Copy *.link files from /etc/systemd/network to initramfs

also sprach Julian Wollrath jwollr...@web.de [2015-07-26 14:06 +0200]: But that would assume, that findutils is installed. I do not known if this is always the case. It's essential, meaning we can rely on it. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian

Bug#793374: [PATCH] Copy *.link files from /etc/systemd/network to initramfs

find /etc/systemd/network --name \*.link --exec cp -pt $DESTDIR/lib/systemd/network/ {} + -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Bug#786443: inhibit while a PID is running

sysv-rc 2.88dsf-59 ii udev215-17 ii util-linux 2.26.2-2 Versions of packages systemd recommends: ii dbus1.9.16-2 ii libpam-systemd 215-17 Versions of packages systemd suggests: pn systemd-ui none -- debconf-show failed -- .''`. martin f. krafft

Bug#761658: Please do not default to using Google nameservers

-party-services over convenience. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems even if you persuade me, you won't persuade me

Bug#761658: Please do not default to using Google nameservers

Marco, is your position unchanged? Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital

Bug#761658: Please do not default to using Google nameservers

adhered to the principle of least surprise. In this case, unless DNS is provided or configured, I'd consider it an unpleasant surprise to find out that we are officially routing our users through a commercial, 3rd party entity, whatever they're called. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o

Bug#761658: Please do not default to using Google nameservers

. At the moment, systemd upstream and Debian basically embrace Google and require people who don't want that to do extra work. If that's a direction to go, then shouldn't postfix also be configured by default to relay mail via GMail? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

-in, but I also see the message all the time. Maybe opt-in isn't working as planned? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems you raise the blade, you make the change you rearrange me till i'm sane. you lock the door, and throw away the key

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

get that irregardless whether systemd-networkd is enabled/active or not. What is the rationale for this choice? Why did you guys decide it was best to log a warning every few seconds and require the admin to take action to restore the old behaviour? -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o

Bug#762101: systemd: Bad configuration option in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link?

-udevd[337]: Network interface NamePolicy= disabled on kernel commandline, ignoring. Oct 7 13:31:57 fishbowl systemd-udevd[337]: Network interface NamePolicy= disabled on kernel commandline, ignoring. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer

Bug#761639: Option to also inhibit lid-suspend when AC or LAN cables are connected

systemd suggests: pn systemd-ui none -- no debconf information -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc

Bug#761658: Please do not default to using Google nameservers

2.88dsf-53.4 ii udev208-8 ii util-linux 2.20.1-5.8 Versions of packages systemd recommends: ii dbus1.8.6-2 ii libpam-systemd 215-3 Versions of packages systemd suggests: pn systemd-ui none -- no debconf information -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o