Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:32:25PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > They are not missing. When I was talking about dependencies I meant the > Breaks/Replaces. but those are not "depends" and I do believe they have different effects than "depends"… > Yeah, as I wrote earlier > "Forcing the upgrade

Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 21.03.2017 um 18:22 schrieb Holger Levsen: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:05:59PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> What should be wrong about the dependencies? > > they are missing? They are not missing. When I was talking about dependencies I meant the Breaks/Replaces. >> Note that you ask

Re: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#856845: piuparts.debian.org: jessie2bpo has >400 packages in dependency-failed-testing status

2017-03-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:05:59PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > What should be wrong about the dependencies? they are missing? > Note that you ask apt explicitly to break stuff (in the logs I see " > --force-yes" which is documented as potentially breaking systems; I > hope users don't use