On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 08:58:57AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > > But maybe it really is (also) a problem with udev's prerm script. > > It is indeed. It got fixed in 228-3, but we can't retroactively fix > the old one.
Hm, I thought dpkg would try the prerm script from the new package if
the one from the old one failed?
> Michael's idea was to drop the Breaks: from ifupdown and
> only keep the Replaces:, which will avoid deconfiguring udev and thus
> avoid running into this old prerm bug. Upgrades will be fine with
> that, it will just not work correctly with partial downgrades. But we
> don't support these anyway.
>
> Unfortunately I don't have a better idea either. Guus, would you be
> okay with dropping the Breaks: to udev again?
If that's the only solution, sure.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <g...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers
